bug in sh-utils-2.0.11-14 /bin/date run under Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla)

2006-09-28 Thread Donovan, Jim
Hi, When started by cron, the following crashes: * * * * * /bin/date 'Hello %c' complaining about cannot find endquote If you try * * * * * /bin/date 'Hello \%c' the backslash appears in the output bur forestalls the error. What is going on please? Jim Donovan Office +61+2-8923-5208 Home +

Re: fold not UTF-8 ready

2006-09-28 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Dan Jacobson on 9/28/2006 7:07 AM: > Fold splits UTF-8 chars into their bytes and probably doesn't know > about their display width either. Known issue. Search the archives. Basically, until someone writes an implementation that makes i

Re: OT: latest stable version not recommended

2006-09-28 Thread mwoehlke
Karl Berry wrote: > with http://directory.fsf.org/gzip.html; no mention there)... which, of 1.3.5 is mentioned on that Directory page as the "(devel)" release. Anyway, I wrote rms about the lack of official releases in recent decades. Ah, my bad... but then, it's still just "devel" (whic

Re: OT: latest stable version not recommended

2006-09-28 Thread Karl Berry
> with http://directory.fsf.org/gzip.html; no mention there)... which, of 1.3.5 is mentioned on that Directory page as the "(devel)" release. Anyway, I wrote rms about the lack of official releases in recent decades. k ___ Bug-coreutils mailing

fail-eperm port to Debian stable

2006-09-28 Thread Paul Eggert
The recent change to fail-eperm caused "make check" to fail on my Debian stable host. I guess its Perl uses a slightly pickier taint check? I installed the following patch, which fixed the problem. "man perlsec" suggested adding those three vars. 2006-09-28 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

FYI: coreutils/lib once again has automatically-generated dependencies

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Since switching coreutils to use gnulib-tool, the lib directory has had no automatically-generated dependencies. I finally noticed it today when modifying a lib/*.h header file and finding that things weren't recompiled. IMHO, gnulib-tool should leave the default (generate them), but provide an op

Re: [patch] coreutils-5.97: tests/rm/fail-eperm fix

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Tim Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I discovered that the rm/fail-eperm test can fail if a temporary file > owned by another user gets selected for attempted deletion when that > filename contains a space. Hi Tim, Thank you for the report and patch. The problem is actually bigger. Here's what

Re: size_t option parsing question

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > xstrtoul is pretty nice! I'll leave it to you to decide how much of coreutils > is worth extending, but in deference to Jim trying to release, it is worth > holding off this task until after 6.3 is out. Thank you :) ___

Re: size_t option parsing question

2006-09-28 Thread Eric Blake
Paul Eggert CS.UCLA.EDU> writes: > > POSIX also states that size_t is only guaranteed to be 16 bits. > > Really? Where? http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/stdint.h.html#tag_13_48 "The following macros specify the minimum and maximum limits of integer types corresponding t

Re: size_t option parsing question

2006-09-28 Thread Paul Eggert
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > POSIX also states that size_t is only guaranteed to be 16 bits. Really? Where? Anyway, this is not an issue for coreutils, since the GNU coding standards say: However, don't make any effort to cater to the possibility that an @code{int} will be less

Re: cvs build error with Apple-installed tools (Re: OT: latest stable version not recommended)

2006-09-28 Thread Paul Eggert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/7179 > ... > When building coreutils-5.97 from the long available stable tarball, make > runs bison and works with Apple's provided versions of the tools. That's not what that URL says. It says you built from CVS

Re: OT: latest stable version not recommended

2006-09-28 Thread mwoehlke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006-09-27 19:00:44 -0500, mwoehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Paul Eggert wrote: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Can I validly talk Apple into upgrading their provided gzip to 1.3.5 when this is not in the stable category (for _whatever_ reason[s])? If 1.3.5 is fine to

size_t option parsing question

2006-09-28 Thread Eric Blake
I'm trying to make m4 -l comply with POSIX guidelines for numeric argument parsing (for example, 'm4 -l a' should issue a complaint that 'a' is not numeric, although this is silently accepted in M4 1.4.7). I decided to turn to coreutils for inspiration. I noticed that various coreutils parse c

fold not UTF-8 ready

2006-09-28 Thread Dan Jacobson
Fold splits UTF-8 chars into their bytes and probably doesn't know about their display width either. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: ASCII sort

2006-09-28 Thread Jerry Feldman
I didn't have time to reply when I saw this. While I am a long time ksh/bash user, I know and work with a lot of people who prefer the C Shell. You are correct in that John can set LC_ALL=C by: setenv LC_ALL C On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:33:23 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > I see by y

[patch] coreutils-5.97: tests/rm/fail-eperm fix

2006-09-28 Thread Tim Waugh
Hi, I discovered that the rm/fail-eperm test can fail if a temporary file owned by another user gets selected for attempted deletion when that filename contains a space. Here is a simple fix. Tim. */ --- coreutils-5.97/tests/rm/fail-eperm.test 2006-09-28 13:22:34.0 +0100 +++ coreutils-5

Re: coreutils-6.2: various runtime problems on Darwin-8.7.0 HFS+ (including attachment this time)

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jim, > >> Is there any type of file system where readdir works? > > Yes. It does work on vfat file systems. No readdir bug reproducible there. Thanks for checking. >> What version of Darwin are you using? > > Darwin 7.9.0 = MacOS X 10.3.9. > > I wro

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: coreutils-6.2: various runtime problems on Darwin-8.7.0 HFS+ (including attachment this time)

2006-09-28 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Jim, > Is there any type of file system where readdir works? Yes. It does work on vfat file systems. No readdir bug reproducible there. > What version of Darwin are you using? Darwin 7.9.0 = MacOS X 10.3.9. I wrote: > In the run test, you can use /bin/rm, since /bin/rm has the same bug >