Eric Blake wrote:
would be the wrong place to add it; POSIX only requires its
definition in . And that is fortunate, since gnulib has not yet
tackled sys/types but does have signal.in.h already. Does the first patch
solve things for you?
I can't test the configure part without first installi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 3/20/2009 6:30 AM:
>> $ find /usr/include | xargs grep sig_atomic_t
>> /usr/include/sys/signal.h:typedef volatile int sig_atomic_t;
>
> Therefore, 'volatile sig_atomic_t' is not a bug, even if sig_atomic_t
> already included
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Andreas Schwab on 3/20/2009 7:20 AM:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> But C99 also states:
>>
>> If the same qualifier appears more than once in the same
>> specifier-qualifier-list, either directly or via one or more typedefs, the
>> behavior
Eric Blake writes:
> But C99 also states:
>
> If the same qualifier appears more than once in the same
> specifier-qualifier-list, either directly or via one or more typedefs, the
> behavior is the same as if it appeared only once.
This paragraph is new in C99. Thus it is not a bug if a C89 com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[adding bug-gnulib]
According to Matthew Woehlke on 3/19/2009 3:07 PM:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>> Also, here is a different (AIX-only) error:
>>>
>>> cc -qlanglvl=ansi -qlanglvl=ansi -g -o ln ln.o libver.a
>>> ../lib/libco
Jim Meyering wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
It's not be the only one.
It's probably the only one in gnulib.
True.
Ok, first, we'll try the patch:
patching file remove.c
You're welcome to do this on your own, but it will take at least a few
more requests to support old compilers (with expl
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> (Please don't miss the AIX error at the bottom that isn't another
> decl-after-stmt.)
>
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Thanks for the report.
>> That's a statement-before-decl:
>> [snip]
>
> It's not be the only one.
It's probably the only one in gnulib.
> Ok, first, we'll try
(Please don't miss the AIX error at the bottom that isn't another
decl-after-stmt.)
Jim Meyering wrote:
Thanks for the report.
That's a statement-before-decl:
[snip]
It's not be the only one.
Ok, first, we'll try the patch:
patching file remove.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 284 (offset 22 lines).
H
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Tail of the build log below; what else would you like?
>
> (I'm retrying the sparc build with the Sun compiler; you /don't/ want
> to know what version of gcc this is ;-). But I don't expect success
> due to AIX having what looks like the same problem.)
>
> sparc/Solar
Tail of the build log below; what else would you like?
(I'm retrying the sparc build with the Sun compiler; you /don't/ want to
know what version of gcc this is ;-). But I don't expect success due to
AIX having what looks like the same problem.)
sparc/Solaris
source='fsusage.c' obj
10 matches
Mail list logo
