Right now I am completely consumed by designing and building
infrastructure for GRUB 1.0.
If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is
comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in fixing
the details (like the docs and user interface issues -- I have a
That change breaks the utility `grub-install'. You need to invent
another way (e.g. "Error: Selected disk does not exist (21)" is ok).
Hmm... ok. Changing grub-install (appended)?
The extra newline is _not_ wasteful. For example, try this:
grub foo [TAB]
I was guessing (without looking
From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [patch] error reporting
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 08:43:09 +0200
Hmm... ok. Changing grub-install (appended)?
Ok.
Isn't it worth trying to use libreadline (static ;) instead?
No. It is a completely user-level library, so it isn't
From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question)
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 08:43:10 +0200
If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is
comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in fixing
the
Jan Fricke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I commented out the test whether the number of the sector to load lie over the
total number of sectors -- and now grub works.
it happened here a few times too.
with the following patch (removes the checking), it works nicely. On some boxes,
changing things
In addition to the zillion warnings in the netboot/ dir (which I'm
dealing with), there are others. Since compilation has warnings on, I
think they should disappear. Some are the fault of *curses, which
polluted the namespace in a horrible and unacceptable way. This cleans
two of such warnings
If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is
comdemned to die.
Your understanding is correct, but whether your work (as well as my
work) is meaningless depends on your standard of value. I myself don't
think I'm wasting time, because: [...]
Well, hard features are
Alessandro Rubini writes:
Right now I am completely consumed by designing and building
infrastructure for GRUB 1.0.
AR If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree
AR is comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in
AR fixing the details (like the
AR Or will figure only prvide the low-level library for GRUB, thus
AR adding portability without changing much of the program?
Exactly.
Very good.
AR It isn't clear at all whether multi-platform support (or at least
AR infrastructure) is planned or not.
It is planned. The first
