[bug #65151] GRUB unable to work with bcachefs multidevice / systems

2024-10-18 Thread INVALID.NOREPLY
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #65151 (group grub): Hi @sesse (or anyone else who can help), thank you for the patch. I am in the same situation error: failed to get canonical path of /dev/vda3:/dev/vdb1. Even if I specify the UUID I always get the same error because I have grub 2.06-13+deb12u1 which

[bug #66300] grub-mkconfig: Missing support for partition labels

2024-10-08 Thread David C. Manuelda
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #66300 (group grub): As posted in the development mailing list I've updated a typo that was preventing the feature from working correctly, I apologize. (file #56490) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File

[bug #66300] grub-mkconfig: Missing support for partition labels

2024-10-08 Thread David C. Manuelda
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #66300 (group grub): Sorry, forgot to commit the code portion relative to GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_LABEL variable default value. Attaching the definitive and final patch. (file #56487) ___ Additional Item Attachment

[bug #66300] grub-mkconfig: Missing support for partition labels

2024-10-08 Thread David C. Manuelda
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #66300 (group grub): To maintain grub codestyle and current functionality flow I updated the patch so now the feature will only be applied if UUIDs and PARTUUIDs are disabled (with GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true and GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_PARTUUID=true) and the new user

[bug #66302] Info doc section "Using GRUB via a serial line" refers to non-existent "--dumb" option

2024-10-07 Thread Jernej Jakob
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66302> Summary: Info doc section "Using GRUB via a serial line" refers to non-existent "--dumb" option Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: jjakob Submitted: Mon 0

[bug #66300] grub-mkconfig: Missing support for partition labels

2024-10-07 Thread stormbyte
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66300> Summary: grub-mkconfig: Missing support for partition labels Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: stormbyte Submitted: lun 07 oct 2024 15:54:01 Category: Configu

[bug #48102] grub-2.02_beta2: grub2-mkconfig does not allow serial_usb0 as terminal

2024-09-26 Thread Jernej Jakob
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #48102 (group grub): I also ran into this issue in 2.06, trying to set GRUB_TERMINAL="console serial_com1 serial_com0". I'm also not sure how to configure multiple serial consoles with GRUB_SERIAL_COMMAND, I tried setting it to two separate serial commands

[bug #66257] grub menu gets stuck due to unreliable rdtsc instruction

2024-09-26 Thread Will Duan
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #66257 (group grub): Q. What's the code logic? A. "grub_tsc_init" function will init tsc by setting grub_tsc_rate, which call stack is: grub_tsc_init -> grub_tsc_calibrate_from_pmtimer -> grub_divmod64 Among, "grub_divmod64&quo

[bug #66257] grub menu gets stuck due to unreliable rdtsc instruction

2024-09-26 Thread Will Duan
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #66257 (group grub): Environment: - OS Verison: Debian 10 - HW Processor: Intel Xeon-2775TE ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66

[bug #66257] grub menu gets stuck due to unreliable rdtsc instruction

2024-09-26 Thread Will Duan
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66257> Summary: grub menu gets stuck due to unreliable rdtsc instruction Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: will_duan Submitted: Thu 26 Sep 2024 07:42:55 AM UTC Category: B

[bug #66200] Booting EFI shell from GRUB using "chainloader" in Qemu with UEFI boot shows video artifacts if we have all_video

2024-09-10 Thread Askar Safin
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66200> Summary: Booting EFI shell from GRUB using "chainloader" in Qemu with UEFI boot shows video artifacts if we have all_video Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: safinaskar Submi

[bug #65039] grub-mkrescue ISO Secure Boot / shim support

2024-09-06 Thread Askar Safin
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #65039 (group grub): I submitted patch, which (I think) is first step to adding secure boot to grup-mkrescue https://lore.kernel.org/grub-devel/20240906132914.27842-1-safinas...@zohomail.com/ ___ Reply to this

[bug #65065] extra_deps.lst not part of grub 2.12 release tarball

2024-08-26 Thread Andrew Hamilton
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #65065 (group grub): This was corrected by commitb835601c7639ed1890f2d3db91900a8506011a8e Reference: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/conf/Makefile.extra-dist?id=b835601c7639ed1890f2d3db91900a8506011a8e Suggest this issue can be closed

[bug #45145] Grub function sleep undocumented

2024-08-07 Thread Andrew Hamilton
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #45145 (group grub): Sleep command is documented in the GRUB2 manual https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub/grub.html#sleep Suggest to close this issue. ___ Reply to this item at: <ht

Re: grub detecting ext2 partition as ISO9660 file system type

2024-08-02 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Vijay Kirpalani wrote: > Step1: > grub-mkrescue --modules="part_msdos part_gpt gzio ext2 iso9660" \ > -o final1.iso -d img0 > Step2: > xorriso -as mkisofs \ >-o final.iso -c boot.catalog -volid "MY_CUSTOM_LINUX" \ >-b boot/grub

Re: grub detecting ext2 partition as ISO9660 file system type

2024-08-01 Thread Vijay Kirpalani
Hi Thomas, Thanks for your email. My responses are inline to your mail below prefixed with VPK>> Thanks, VIjay On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > if you reply to this mail, then please also o bug-grub@gnu.org, not only > to me in private. (A p

Re: grub detecting ext2 partition as ISO9660 file system type

2024-08-01 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, if you reply to this mail, then please also o bug-grub@gnu.org, not only to me in private. (A private Cc to me is unnecessary but would be ok.) Vijay Kirpalani wrote: > I built a bootable ISO and have appended an ext2 disk partition in it. How exactly did you do it ? (Really the stra

grub detecting ext2 partition as ISO9660 file system type

2024-08-01 Thread Vijay Kirpalani
Hi, I built a bootable ISO and have appended an ext2 disk partition in it. I booted the ISO in Virtual Box. During boot, i see grub is detecting the ext2 partition as part of cd drive and as type Iso9660. To elaborate. on the grub command line when i do an ls i get (hd0), (cd), (cd,msdos2), (cd

[bug #65065] extra_deps.lst not part of grub 2.12 release tarball

2024-07-19 Thread private sorry
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #65065 (group grub): relevant stackoverflow: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/780455/how-to-get-a-copy-of-libdevmapper-1-02-34-or-later?noredirect=1#comment1493540_780455 ___ Reply to this item at

[bug #65065] extra_deps.lst not part of grub 2.12 release tarball

2024-07-19 Thread private sorry
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #65065 (group grub): I emailed the mailing list about this and phcoder helped me out, thank you phcoder! :) He said: syminfo.lst is generated automatically. You don't need to supply it. Your error means 2 things: 1) real error is earlier in the log 2) most likel

[bug #65940] Add netmask and dns IP address variables for use in grub

2024-07-02 Thread Phil
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65940> Summary: Add netmask and dns IP address variables for use in grub Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: papamoose Submitted: Wed 03 Jul 2024 01:41:41 AM UTC Category

[bug #65880] heap-buffer-overflow in grub-mkrescue.c

2024-07-01 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #65880 (group grub): Hi, belatedly i can report that the proposed change was committed to the git repo of GRUB as https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=b53ec06a1d6f22ffc1139cbfc0f292e4ca2da9cd I propose to close the bug now. Have a nice day

[bug #65918] dns queries are case sensitive (2.06, probably olded grub too)

2024-06-25 Thread Koskin Ilya
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65918> Summary: dns queries are case sensitive (2.06, probably olded grub too) Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: kasakoff Submitted: Вт 25 июн 2024 07:29:30 Category: N

[bug #65909] GRUB 2.12 should not use large model for compilation on riscv64

2024-06-22 Thread Jason Montleon
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65909> Summary: GRUB 2.12 should not use large model for compilation on riscv64 Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: jmontleon Submitted: Sat 22 Jun 2024 03:45:03 PM UTC Ca

[bug #65880] heap-buffer-overflow in grub-mkrescue.c

2024-06-17 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #65880 (group grub): Hi, the patch is now posted for review and testing at grub-devel: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2024-06/msg00163.html Have a nice day :) Thomas ___ Reply to this item at

Re: [bug #65880] heap-buffer-overflow in grub-mkrescue.c

2024-06-17 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Vladimir Serbinenko wrote: > Thomas, savannah just butchers the patch. Looking in my mailbox ... that line break before "argument" is not by me. > Can you send it to ML? I have it ready for grub-devel (git format-patch) and plan to post it by "git send-email" thi

[bug #65880] heap-buffer-overflow in grub-mkrescue.c

2024-06-17 Thread Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #65880 (group grub): Thomas, savannah just butchers the patch. Can you send it to ML? ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65880> ___ M

[bug #65880] heap-buffer-overflow in grub-mkrescue.c

2024-06-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #65880 (group grub): Hi, i can confirm that it happens on Debian 12 with the Debian amd64 package grub-common (2.06-13+deb12u1) (plus grub-efi-amd64 , grub-efi-amd64-bin , grub-efi-amd64-signed , grub2-common) and also with a git clone of today. The change at the end

[bug #65880] heap-buffer-overflow in grub-mkrescue.c

2024-06-14 Thread Victoriia Egorova
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65880> Summary: heap-buffer-overflow in grub-mkrescue.c Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: vegorova Submitted: Пт 14 июн 2024 11:13:08 Category: None Severity:

[PATCH] util/grub-mkrescue: use capitalised paths for removable EFI images

2024-06-11 Thread Mingcong Bai
short-name}.EFI. While FAT < 32 filesystems are not case sensitive (which grub-mkrescue creates as a FAT12 image via mformat with a size of 2.88MiB), it seems that some of Loongson's LoongArch-based firmware (namely those found on their latest XA61200 boards) seems to treat this file system

Re: os-prober slow, grub-mount results in very slow file transfers

2024-05-15 Thread stratus--- via Bug reports for the GRand Unified Bootloader
Thank you, I shall ask the os-prober maintainers instead, it sounds like regular mount (or something else) would be better to use for that purpose after perhaps testing it's available, I'd guess grub-mount might have been designed to use in the minimal early boot environment with t

[bug #65746] grub-probe fails to identify squashfs/zstd

2024-05-14 Thread Thomas Capricelli
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65746> Summary: grub-probe fails to identify squashfs/zstd Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: orzel Submitted: Tue 14 May 2024 07:09:59 PM UTC Category: File

Re: os-prober slow, grub-mount results in very slow file transfers

2024-05-13 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
We don't maintain os-prober. As for grub-mount it was never meant to be fast and certainly isn't Le lun. 13 mai 2024, 22:47, stratus--- via Bug reports for the GRand Unified Bootloader a écrit : > Dear Grub maintainers, myself and others on the Artix forum have > experienced

os-prober slow, grub-mount results in very slow file transfers

2024-05-13 Thread stratus--- via Bug reports for the GRand Unified Bootloader
Dear Grub maintainers, myself and others on the Artix forum have experienced problems with os-prober running very slowly. The issue seems to occur in other distros as well, and the same subject has come up before in the past: https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,6818.msg41493 It appears

[bug #60385] GRUB fails to finish parsing LVM metadata when there's a dm-cache metadata lv with policy settings

2024-05-12 Thread Attila Nagy
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #60385 (group grub): Also Bug #63796 and Bug #64291 look suspicious that they might be related to this issue. ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60

[bug #60385] GRUB fails to finish parsing LVM metadata when there's a dm-cache metadata lv with policy settings

2024-05-12 Thread Attila Nagy
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #60385 (group grub): I've encountered this bug today, and unaware of taoky's solution I've created a fix as well. The problem is very well described in this ticket: the current parser is unaware of any nested blocks when searching for the end of a segmen

Bug report grub 2.12 - make check

2024-04-12 Thread Norbert Kiszka via Bug reports for the GRand Unified Bootloader
Hi. Distro: Debian 12 uname -a Linux tm 5.10.0-26-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.197-1 (2023-09-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux Best regards. = GRUB 2.12: ./test-suite.log = # TOTAL: 86 # PASS: 26 # SKIP: 2 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 51 # XPASS: 0

Grub 2.12 problem with vmnext3 network card and PXE

2024-03-21 Thread Mathias Radtke
Some of our vSphere VMs are using vmnext3 networc cards. Grub2.12 is downloaded via TFTP onto the VMs. An embedded grub.cfg downloads a grub.cfg placed on a TFTP server. However since Grub 2.12 this doesn't work anymore. When executing the embeeded cfg the cursor stalls for a couple of se

grub-mkrescue with pgp --pubkey might be broken in grub 2.12 on EFI

2024-03-19 Thread Reto Buerki
Repost from help-grub: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-grub/2024-03/msg4.html I'm using grub-mkrescue in combination with the pgp --pubkey feature to put grub into check_signatures=enforce mode, and to only have signed data loaded and processed. Something like: grub-mkr

[bug #65389] GRUB 2.12 General Protection Exception

2024-03-01 Thread Ian Ormshaw
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65389> Summary: GRUB 2.12 General Protection Exception Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: ormshaw Submitted: Fri 01 Mar 2024 02:00:54 PM UTC Category: Booting Se

[bug #65250] GRUB unable to PXE boot

2024-02-03 Thread Qiumiao Zhang
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65250> Summary: GRUB unable to PXE boot Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: century6 Submitted: Sun 04 Feb 2024 07:01:23 AM UTC Category: Network Severity:

Cannot install grub on XFS from chroot

2024-01-29 Thread Имя Фамилия
ng to install grub inside a chrooted system: # grub-install --target=i386-pc /dev/sdc Installing for i386-pc platform. grub-install: error: unknown filesystem This error occurs exactly inside chroot and only when using the xfs file system. Grub version is 2.06. Is this a bug or has XFS support been re

[bug #65151] GRUB unable to work with bcachefs multidevice / systems

2024-01-28 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65151 (group grub): The included patch fixes multi-device booting (at least the relevant parts for GRUB; the initramfs still needs to understand root=UUID=foo). It does _not_ make GRUB capable of having /boot on bcachefs, but it fixes so that it understands the /dev/foo

[bug #65162] grub-install: does not detect required algorithm to decrypt luks2

2024-01-14 Thread Peter Volkov
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65162> Summary: grub-install: does not detect required algorithm to decrypt luks2 Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: pva0xd Submitted: Вс 14 янв 2024 19:19:36 Category: Instal

[bug #65151] GRUB unable to work with bcachefs multidevice / systems

2024-01-11 Thread Immolo
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65151> Summary: GRUB unable to work with bcachefs multidevice / systems Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: immolo Submitted: Thu 11 Jan 2024 08:02:03 AM UTC Category: File

[bug #65113] Add All Keyboard Layouts and Selector to Early GRUB Core Image (grubx64.efi)

2024-01-03 Thread adrelanos
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65113> Summary: Add All Keyboard Layouts and Selector to Early GRUB Core Image (grubx64.efi) Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: adrelanos Submitted: Wed 03 Jan 2024 03:44:12

[grub-mkconfig] Problem with generation method in grub-mkconfig

2024-01-02 Thread Alban PONCHE
Hello, actually, with grub-mkconfig, you can't use "sed -i /boot/grub/grub.cfg.new" in one of /etc/grub.d/* script, due to the use of "exec > /boot/grub/grub.cfg.new" method. I propose to rewrite the output redirection in more standard way, to permit usage of sed -i i

[bug #65072] Grub version 2.12 for Windows grub-mkimage.exe creates bad code

2024-01-01 Thread Dave Pickens
Follow-up Comment #2, bug#65072 (group grub): I have attached two additional files: output.genefi32.txtoutput of grub-mkimage for EFI 32 bit output.genbios.txt output of grub-mkimage for non EFI I noted that the __stack_chk_guard output entries are quite different in the EFI 32 bit

[bug #65103] no way to disable secure boot signature for images to boot from grub

2024-01-01 Thread akallabeth
Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65103 (group grub): missing from the initial report: 1. using 2.12-rc1 debian package with argon2 patches from https://gitlab.com/mattz7/pkgbuild-public 2. I use different keys for MOK and grub (RSA2048 vs RSA4096

[bug #65103] no way to disable secure boot signature for images to boot from grub

2024-01-01 Thread akallabeth
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65103> Summary: no way to disable secure boot signature for images to boot from grub Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: akallabeth Submitted: Mon 01 Jan 2024 11:04:44 AM UTC Ca

[bug #65074] Installing grub to relative path causes installation to 2 different locations

2023-12-22 Thread Mexit
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65074> Summary: Installing grub to relative path causes installation to 2 different locations Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: mexit Submitted: Fri 22 Dec 2023 07:39:28

[bug #65065] extra_deps.lst not part of grub 2.12 release tarball

2023-12-22 Thread Guido Trentalancia
Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65065 (group grub): It seems like the following commit has not been included in the 2.12 release: commit 57059ccb62f91548dae8550dcf8d5cc45fcee9c5 Author: Oliver Steffen Date: Thu Nov 16 16:37:39 2023 +0100 bli: Add explicit dependency on the part_gpt module

[bug #65072] Grub version 2.12 for Windows grub-mkimage.exe creates bad code

2023-12-21 Thread Dave Pickens
Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65072 (group grub): I have also attached file output.genefi64.txt which is the console output of the grub-mkimage command. ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65

[bug #65072] Grub version 2.12 for Windows grub-mkimage.exe creates bad code

2023-12-21 Thread Dave Pickens
Additional Item Attachment, bug#65072 (group grub): File name: output.genefi64.txtSize:287 KB <https://file.savannah.gnu.org/file/output.genefi64.txt?file_id=55479> AGPL NOTICE These attachments are served by Savane. You can download the corresponding source code of

[bug #65072] Grub version 2.12 for Windows grub-mkimage.exe creates bad code

2023-12-21 Thread Dave Pickens
Additional Item Attachment, bug#65072 (group grub): File name: grub-212-error.jpg Size:17 KB <https://file.savannah.gnu.org/file/grub-212-error.jpg?file_id=55477> File name: gen-image.bat Size:7 KB <https://file.savannah.gnu.org/file/gen-image.ba

[bug #65072] Grub version 2.12 for Windows grub-mkimage.exe creates bad code

2023-12-21 Thread Dave Pickens
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65072> Summary: Grub version 2.12 for Windows grub-mkimage.exe creates bad code Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: drummerdp Submitted: Fri 22 Dec 2023 02:20:52 AM UTC Category

[bug #65065] extra_deps.lst not part of grub 2.12 release tarball

2023-12-20 Thread Jan Palus
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65065> Summary: extra_deps.lst not part of grub 2.12 release tarball Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: jpalus Submitted: Wed 20 Dec 2023 08:15:28 PM UTC Category: Compi

[bug #65038] grub-mkimage ISO Secure Boot / shim support

2023-12-16 Thread adrelanos
Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65038 (group grub): Probably duplicate of https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65039 I meant to say grub-mkrescue. Not grub-mkimage. Sorry for the noise. ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/b

[bug #65039] grub-mkrescue ISO Secure Boot / shim support

2023-12-16 Thread adrelanos
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65039> Summary: grub-mkrescue ISO Secure Boot / shim support Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: adrelanos Submitted: Sat 16 Dec 2023 11:18:52 AM UTC Category: B

[bug #65038] grub-mkimage ISO Secure Boot / shim support

2023-12-16 Thread adrelanos
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65038> Summary: grub-mkimage ISO Secure Boot / shim support Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: adrelanos Submitted: Sat 16 Dec 2023 11:15:06 AM UTC Category: B

Grub update error

2023-12-10 Thread Hikmat E Ustad
Greetings, I have a detailed conversation about my triple boot GRUB error on an MBR system now solved at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2136569 Please be advised that I can always answer more queries. Thank you, Hikmat E Ustad

[bug #64950] List grub-reboot MENU_ENTRY options

2023-11-30 Thread Adam Cimarosti
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64950> Summary: List grub-reboot MENU_ENTRY options Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: amunra Submitted: Thu 30 Nov 2023 09:50:05 AM UTC Category: User Int

Re: [bug #64297] snapshotting a zfs-based boot pool renders it unreadable by grub

2023-11-17 Thread AMODIA Bioservice GmbH
User" error.) Kind regards Am 17.11.23 um 05:24 schrieb ewnv: Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64297 (project grub): I still encounter this error running Arch with Grub version 2:2.12rc1-5. I Had to destroy the pool and recreate one, then disable snapshotting on the "boot&q

[bug #64297] snapshotting a zfs-based boot pool renders it unreadable by grub

2023-11-16 Thread ewnv
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64297 (project grub): I still encounter this error running Arch with Grub version 2:2.12rc1-5. I Had to destroy the pool and recreate one, then disable snapshotting on the "boot" pool as a temporary

[bug #64297] snapshotting a zfs-based boot pool renders it unreadable by grub

2023-11-15 Thread Maurice Volaski
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64297 (project grub): Were these patches ever incorporated? I install using Gentoo, the build and I believe it pulls in whatever is current in git. The bug is still present. ___ Reply to this item at

[bug #64821] grub-install reports "error: unknown filesystem."

2023-10-27 Thread Steve
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #64821 (project grub): Forgot to mention the actual version: grub-install (GRUB) 2.06-13 ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64

[bug #64821] grub-install reports "error: unknown filesystem."

2023-10-26 Thread Steve
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64821> Summary: grub-install reports "error: unknown filesystem." Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: greatsun Submitted: Thu 26 Oct 2023 03:57:08 PM UTC Catego

[bug #64475] grub failed to initrd /boot/amd-ucode.img in btrfs partition with bees

2023-10-09 Thread INVALID.NOREPLY
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #64475 (project grub): It happened to me too and I'd like to receive notifications on this bug (I didn't figure out another way besides leaving a comment). ___ Reply to this item at: <https://sav

[bug #64376] error: file '/grub/x86_64-efi/normal.mod' not found.

2023-09-27 Thread Jon DeVree
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #64376 (project grub): I just posted an updated v3 to the mailing list: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-09/msg00110.html ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64

Re: Grub XFS normal.mod not found error

2023-09-18 Thread Lidong Chen
Hello, Jon DeVree upstream posted a new patch which may fix your issue. Maybe you can give it a try? <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-09/msg00059.html> [PATCH] Fix XFS directory extent parsing<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-09/msg00059.html> l

[bug #64376] error: file '/grub/x86_64-efi/normal.mod' not found.

2023-09-15 Thread Jon
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #64376 (project grub): No one seemed to be looking into this so I posted a fix on grub-devel: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-09/msg00059.html ___ Reply to this item at: <ht

Re: Grub XFS normal.mod not found error

2023-08-17 Thread Daniel Kiper
Vacation time, sorry for late reply... Adding Lidong... On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:27:33AM +, Steve wrote: > Hello, > > Last reply from you guys was on the 13th, and we have yet to see issue > addressed. I, as a Distro maintainer, had to create a new repo where I held > grub

[bug #64514] 'grub-emu-lite' failed to start 'normal' mode (command 'normal' in module 'normal.mod') due to missing license informati

2023-08-03 Thread Martin Lopatář
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64514> Summary: 'grub-emu-lite' failed to start 'normal' mode (command 'normal' in module 'normal.mod') due to missing license informati Group: GNU GRUB Submitte

grub-script-check does not catch typos?

2023-08-03 Thread AMODIA Bioservice GmbH
Maybe this is not a bug, but why does grub-script-check not complain about this script with intentional typos? === enuentry 'New Install' { insmod part_msdos ismod et2 st root='(hd0,msdos1)' echo'Loading Linux New Install ...' linux /bo

Syntax errors are detected in generated GRUB config file.

2023-08-02 Thread Karsten
After update: # LANG=C update-grub Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-linux-lts ... Found initrd image: /boot/intel-ucode.img /boot/amd-ucode.img /boot/initramfs-linux.img Found fallback initrd image(s) in /boot: intel-ucode.img amd-ucode.img initramfs

[bug #64405] Keystrokes repeating in grub menu

2023-08-01 Thread Travis
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #64405 (project grub): I have have the same issue. Grub version: 2.06-3~deb10u2. Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd B550-A PRO (MS-7C56). A few interesting things: 1) the same issue happens in BIOS mode programs such as FreeDOS 2) (for me at least) the

Grub takes a long time to start when EFI is slow to respond

2023-08-01 Thread Ghadi Rahme
impacting the start times of grub. When grub is starting in a UEFI environment there are certain scenarios where it could take multiple minutes for grub to show the grub menu. The reason is that during initialization when invoking the function "grub_efidisk_read" in disk/efi/efidisk.c, th

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-28 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #24, bug #64471 (project grub): One thing to ask? Did grub has any code related to reading / parsing paging tables? Looks like it dosn't. How to read physical memory? Is here grub_ method for that? Or should I switch to some protected mode back and forth using asm

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-28 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #23, bug #64471 (project grub): What I understand from Paging is that I had to request memory from efi using allocate_pages then check if pages table contains this virtual address, so it was mapped correctly by the efi. page table located at physical address pointed by part of

Grub XFS normal.mod not found error

2023-07-28 Thread Steve
Hello, Last reply from you guys was on the 13th, and we have yet to see issue addressed. I, as a Distro maintainer, had to create a new repo where I held grub back to r499 as a result of this, not really ideal now is it ? Kindly update us on the situation and ETA for fix.. -- Best

[bug #64475] grub failed to initrd /boot/amd-ucode.img in btrfs partition with bees

2023-07-28 Thread Watermelon Rei
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #64475 (project grub): Hello, I used "qemu-img create -f raw example.img 200M" to created a 200Mb image file, and "losetup /dev/loop0 example.img", mounting example.img as a loop device. Then I formatted the /dev/loop0 by mkfs.btrfs with default o

[bug #64475] grub failed to initrd /boot/amd-ucode.img in btrfs partition with bees

2023-07-27 Thread Watermelon Rei
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #64475 (project grub): [comment #2 comment #2:] > Can you recreate this with a small image and send it to me? You can use grub-fstest IMAGE cmp PATHINIMAGE PATHEXTERNAL to check if GRUB sees your files correctly When I try to create a 16Mb raw img file and mkfs.bt

[bug #64475] grub failed to initrd /boot/amd-ucode.img in btrfs partition with bees

2023-07-27 Thread Watermelon Rei
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64475 (project grub): Here is the output of grub-fstest: $ sudo grub-fstest /dev/nvme0n1p5 cmp /boot/amd-ucode.img linux-firmware/src/amd-ucode.img grub-fstest: error: unexpected end of file. $ sha512sum /boot/amd-ucode.img

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #22, bug #64471 (project grub): Ok. I simplified the patch, now it does not change grub_efi_allocate_pages_real. Wild guess does it fix a) issue, since grub_efi_mm_add_regions only affecting grub_malloc? I'm going to bed, I'll check paging later.. (f

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #21, bug #64471 (project grub): [(Erreur - Introuvable)] [comment #20 commentaire #20 :] > Ok I understand now. > > a) I guess you didn't mention that allocating disk buffers from above 4GB can corrupt the data? Otherwise why not let it fail during to disk o

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #19, bug #64471 (project grub): [(Erreur - Introuvable)] [comment #18 commentaire #18 :] > > [comment #17 comment #17:] > > > > [comment #16 commentaire #16 :] > > > > > > [comment #15 comment #15:] > > > > Where do you check

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #20, bug #64471 (project grub): Ok I understand now. a) I guess you didn't mention that allocating disk buffers from above 4GB can corrupt the data? Otherwise why not let it fail during to disk operation if it going to fail due to out of memory error? b) No idea what is p

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #17, bug #64471 (project grub): [(Erreur - Introuvable)] [comment #16 commentaire #16 :] > > [comment #15 comment #15:] > > Where do you check the page table? > > I do not understand. Can you view the smartmem.patch? Yes, I've seen it. And you need to

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #18, bug #64471 (project grub): [comment #17 comment #17:] > > [comment #16 commentaire #16 :] > > > > [comment #15 comment #15:] > > > Where do you check the page table? > > > > I do not understand. Can you view the smartmem.patch?

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #16, bug #64471 (project grub): [comment #15 comment #15:] > Where do you check the page table? I do not understand. Can you view the smartmem.patch? ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #64471 (project grub): When I said "no patches" I mean grub 2.06+argon2 patches+new grub2.12 memory patches. no bigmem (4GB+) patches. ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.or

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #15, bug #64471 (project grub): [(Erreur - Introuvable)] Where do you check the page table? ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64471> ___ M

[bug #64475] grub failed to initrd /boot/amd-ucode.img in btrfs partition with bees

2023-07-27 Thread Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64475 (project grub): [(Erreur - Introuvable)] Can you recreate this with a small image and send it to me? You can use grub-fstest IMAGE cmp PATHINIMAGE PATHEXTERNAL to check if GRUB sees your files correctly

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #14, bug #64471 (project grub): Desktop e820 with 32GB output. dmesg | awk '/usable/ && /BIOS-e820/ && match($0, /mem ([0-9a-z]+)-([0-9a-z]+)/,aa){s=strtonum(aa[1]);e=strtonum(aa[2]);if(e-s>1*1024*1024*1024)printf("0x%x-0x%x %dGB\n",s,e,((e

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #64471 (project grub): Without any patches (<4GB usage range). On desktop Grub corrupt screen when trying to allocate a lot of memory. Looks like it touching the regions of memory it should not touch. Photo attached. (file #54

[bug #64297] snapshotting a zfs-based boot pool renders it unreadable by grub

2023-07-27 Thread Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #64297 (project grub): [(Erreur - Introuvable)] I have posted couple of zfs patches to mailing list recently. They look similar. Can you test them? ___ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/b

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #64471 (project grub): I made it work by adding smart memory patch as I described below in comment 9. Here is a code. It working! https://gitlab.com/axet/homebin/-/blob/debian/dbuild.d/bookworm/grub2/smartmem.patch (file #54986

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-27 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #64471 (project grub): I had to install 4GB into my machine here is a dmesg for 4GB. Almost the same, only 1GB+ at 0x1 dmesg | awk '/usable/ && /BIOS-e820/ && match($0, /mem ([0-9a-z]+)-([0-9a-z]+)/,aa){s=strtonum(aa[1]);e=strtonum(a

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-26 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #64471 (project grub): I guess we need smi-automatic GRUB_EFI_MAX_USABLE_ADDRESS variable. If we have enough memory from low memory segment (<4GB), then use it. If we have no memory and grub about to return out of memory error, instead crashing, why not to try alloc

[bug #64471] grub efi memory allocation (efi/mm) does not work on every machine

2023-07-26 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #64471 (project grub): base_addr = 0x0, length = 0x92000, available RAM base_addr = 0x92000, length = 0xc000, available RAM base_addr = 0x9e000, length = 0x1000, reserved RAM base_addr = 0x9f000, length = 0x1000, available RAM base_addr = 0x10, length = 0x1a21

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >