Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns!)

2000-04-13 Thread Christoph Plattner
Video-Card detections is not the biggest problem, as there is a signature on 0xC, telling there is a bios extension, and if this test is not good enough, it is also possible scan for a signature or to check default io ports as 0x3d4, etc. But consider, that many embedded machines have

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version,itruns!)

2000-04-13 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns!) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:39:13 +0200 In the first moment, I also thought, that autodetection is the only solution. But on the other hand, if I consider, that GRUB

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns!)

2000-04-12 Thread Tim Riker
Thanx for considering it. ;-) There has to be some way, the Linux kernel determines somehow if vitual consoles exist. Now, is there an easy way... ;-) OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: From: Tim Riker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns !)

2000-04-11 Thread Christoph Plattner
Hallo again ! Of course this is only a quick-test-hack. Many design issues have to be discussed. In my version of patched grub, a compile option -DGRUB_SERIAL_CONSOLE is used to deside, whether the PC console or the serial one is used - not very good ! Very bad. Note that one of

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns!)

2000-04-11 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns !) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:12:18 +0200 What should grub do, if no config file (menu.lst) is present ? (Default) GRUB shouldn't use serial console. Why do

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns!)

2000-04-11 Thread Christoph Plattner
OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: From: Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns !) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:12:18 +0200 What should grub do, if no config file (menu.lst) is present ? (Default) GRUB shouldn't use

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version,itruns!)

2000-04-11 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns!) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:21:48 +0200 Of course, inversion is also possible, but the problem is the time to draw it up. If you use line inversion, you have to rewrite every

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns!)

2000-04-11 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Tim Riker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns !) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:19:47 -0600 While these are nice to have, what happens in a CD boot environment? You show me a good point. To be honest, I must say that I haven't

Re: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, itruns !)

2000-04-10 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Grub over serial line - status ! (I did a test version, it runs !) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:56:41 +0200 As I need the GRUB over serial line @home, I hacked it in. As the first try, I used the bios functionality (int 0x14). The stuff runs !