grub boot fails to find .img files when booting linux w/separate /boot partition

My archlinux system has a separate boot partition NAME SIZE UUID OWNER GROUP LABEL MOUNTPOINT sda465.8G root disk ├─sda1 19.5G d7c05292-01fc-a6ac-9961-ef349991e2ac root disk arch_boot /boot ├─sda2 62.5G

[bug #45279] grub-install error on LVM-system without separate boot partition

Update of bug #45279 (project grub): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Messag

[bug #45279] grub-install error on LVM-system without separate boot partition

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #45279 (project grub): Closing then. Feel free to reopen if you have a way to reproduce it. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mes

[bug #45279] grub-install error on LVM-system without separate boot partition

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #45279 (project grub): Unfortunately, I cannot check it: i met this problem while installing my main system, after facing it I used another partitioning (separate /boot and LVM on a partition), so I cannot test it on my main system. In virtualbox this problem doesn't repr

[bug #45279] grub-install error on LVM-system without separate boot partition

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #45279 (project grub): Do you see it with current GIT master? It should not even invoke vgs unless it is built without device-mapper support. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #45279] grub-install error on LVM-system without separate boot partition

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?45279> Summary: grub-install error on LVM-system without separate boot partition Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: jaysonwillson245 Submitted on: Mon 08 Jun 2015 07:15:35 PM GMT Ca

[bug #38868] update-grub generates bad grub.cfg linux vm root=UUID in separate boot partition

Update of bug #38868 (project grub): Status:None => Invalid Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #38868] update-grub generates bad grub.cfg linux vm root=UUID in separate boot partition

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #38868 (project grub): Wrong LPARAMS is a bug in linux-boot-prober. Please take issue to debian-boot team. ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #38868] update-grub generates bad grub.cfg linux vm root=UUID in separate boot partition

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38868> Summary: update-grub generates bad grub.cfg linux vm root=UUID in separate boot partition Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: doug10xspeedup Submitted on: Thu 02 May 2013 08:31:33

Re: FW: LFS GRUB, LVM and a separate boot partition woes

> > > > I will post a short description of the problem, and await requests > for > > further details, if required. > > > > I am building an LFS (Linux From Scratch) system, which boots OK with > > LILO. This has a separate boot partition (non LVM), and al

Fwd: FW: LFS GRUB, LVM and a separate boot partition woes

stem, which boots OK with > LILO. This has a separate boot partition (non LVM), and also a non > LVM root partition. > > LILO has no problem booting this system with current LFS scripts. > > GRUB has a problem, because (I assume) the root partition is mounted > ro when a vgs

Re: LFS GRUB, LVM and a separate boot partition woes

description of the problem, and await requests for > further details, if required. > > I am building an LFS (Linux From Scratch) system, which boots OK with > LILO. This has a separate boot partition (non LVM), and also a non > LVM root partition. > > LILO has no problem booti

LFS GRUB, LVM and a separate boot partition woes

building an LFS (Linux From Scratch) system, which boots OK with LILO. This has a separate boot partition (non LVM), and also a non LVM root partition. LILO has no problem booting this system with current LFS scripts. GRUB has a problem, because (I assume) the root partition is mounted ro when a

Separate Boot Partition

Hi -- Please excuse the intrusion. I've been playing around with placing grub in a separate boot partition and I've encountered numerous problems. There seems to be an FAQ directly on point which offers 3 solutions. None of the solutions work for me and I'm not sure that I woul

Re: Bug with separate boot partition and non-MBR install

r EZ-BIOS loaded, then boot loaded GRUB, I get Error > 0x01 over and over again. What does "setup (hd0,0)" print? I suspect it is specifying a wrong path somewhere. And what is exactly printed on boot? > I looked this up and figured it had to be > something about my separa

Re: Bug with separate boot partition and non-MBR install

nd the files in /grub, and output an install command using /grub instead of /boot/grub. I just don't know if it was the combination of both EZ-BIOS and a separate boot partition that was too much for the setup command. > Yes, you still need a symlink for 0.5.96.1 and separate boot parti

Bug with separate boot partition and non-MBR install

esulted in unrecognizable partition types. I tried root (hd0,0) followed by setup (hd0,0), which reported success, then rebooted. After EZ-BIOS loaded, then boot loaded GRUB, I get Error 0x01 over and over again. I looked this up and figured it had to be something about my separate boot partition

Re: Cosmetic suppression of FAQ entry about separate boot partition

It's still relevant; the answer is just out-of-dated. Okuji ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Cosmetic suppression of FAQ entry about separate boot partition

3 +1,9 @@ +2001-01-21 Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * docs/appendices.texi (FAQ): cosmetic suppression of the entry + related to the way GRUB handles a separate boot partition ; no + more relevant. + 2001-01-15 OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: grub-install doesn't handle correctly separate /boot partition

From: Alessandro Rubini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: grub-install doesn't handle correctly separate /boot partition Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 23:07:32 +0200 > If, however, "$1" looks too generic or awk doesn't look a good tool to > use, the sed expression should

Re: grub-install doesn't handle correctly separate /boot partition

I think there is another problem with the line shown by Thierry: > grubdir_device=`df ${grubdir} | grep /dev/ \ > | sed 's%.*\(/dev/[a-z0-9]*\).*%\1%'` The sed expression is wrong as it restricts device names to be lowercase alphanumeric chars. This is a bad assumption. I'd prefer to make n

Re: grub-install doesn't handle correctly separate /boot partition

Thanks for your report. I'll fix the bug. Okuji ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

grub-install doesn't handle correctly separate /boot partition

Hello, I have a separate /boot partition. the problem is that grub-install can't handle smoothly this. Details. In order to find the devices, the grub-install script uses the `df' command ; but the `df' command is used with a _directory_ name on mounted fs. Thus, this ass

Re: separate boot partition support

Hi. > But there is one thing which must be done soon: Update the docs. In > particular, we should write a chapter about the serial terminal > support. Alessandro, would you like to work on that? Yes. Sorry for being so quiet, but I moved my home and lost my fixed connection to the net; and I'

separate boot partition support

Because many people make mistakes about their separate boot partitions, I have added the support into the command "setup" and the utility "grub-install". The command "setup" now also supports `--prefix', so that you can specify a directory but "/boot/grub". Please test these new features. If the

For the separate boot partition problem

I have updated the GNU GRUB FAQ on the web, for the frequently asked "separate boot partition" problem. If that's good, I'll update the chapter "FAQ" in the texinfo document as well. BTW, would anyone like to take over the maintenance of the documentation from m