Re: look at this "bug"...

2003-12-09 Thread Paul D. Smith
This has been reported as an enhancement and the change was made already. It will be available in the next release of GNU make. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at:

Re: Possible make license violation/miss-comprehension by SN Systems

2003-12-09 Thread Paul D. Smith
, as well as every bit of correspondence you have had with that company, to the email address on the page. If it wouldn't be too much trouble please CC me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on that email as well so I can track this. Thanks! --

Re: SOS

2004-01-03 Thread Paul D. Smith
d to ask the people from whom you got the SOS-10.12.03.zip software what the problem is. -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make

Re: bug report

2004-01-03 Thread Paul D. Smith
econd, there is nowhere in GNU make that the text "macro substitution" (in any case) exists, much less is printed. Finally, there is no "?:" macro operator in GNU make, so I don't know what the above construct might be supposed to mean. -- ------

Re: make chokes on rules with colons in it

2004-01-03 Thread Paul D. Smith
s part of a target or prerequisite name in GNU make (at least not reliably). -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Ma

Re: bug report

2004-01-05 Thread Paul D. Smith
e a syntax error, when that's not a syntax error? sn> Do you have any shorter alternative in GNU make other than sn> "ifdef". Since you didn't specify exactly what behavior "?:" provides I can't say for sure, but look up the ?= assignment operator i

Re: bug report

2004-01-05 Thread Paul D. Smith
n't have one, but it won't help if you're trying to define a variable to a value if some other variable doesn't have one. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips a

Re: trouble building make-3.80

2004-01-05 Thread Paul D. Smith
You're correct about the missing reference to hash.obj. This has been addressed already in the source and will be fixed in the next release. Thanks! -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find so

Re: GNUmake fails with -k option (code = 0xc0000005, addr = 0x40cb7c)

2004-01-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
hang out there. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist ___

Re: 3.80 and FreeBSD-5.1

2004-01-07 Thread Paul D. Smith
. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist ___ Bug-make mai

Re: 3.81 ... any dates for release

2004-01-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
on Savannah I would hope that something official would be out in the next 4-6 weeks or so. But, nothing is certain... -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu

Re: Enhancement request regarding make variable names

2004-01-09 Thread Paul D. Smith
on would be if the kernel builds could be changed to be a little more robust, say by quoting "=" signs with "\". Other than that, or allowing you to disable the feature altogether (which might break something else, I don't know), I don't see any good alternative

Re: Are pattern variables additive?

2004-01-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
version of GNU make from CVS your example gives: $ ./make hello a a+b c -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: make-3.80 fails to compile

2004-01-18 Thread Paul D. Smith
ch: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=1536 Or, you can use the make you currently have on your system to build GNU make, rather than using build.sh. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: possible bug with build.sh on HP-UX 11.11

2004-01-18 Thread Paul D. Smith
ot GNU make, to build GNU make. -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad,

Re: make-3.80 doesn't even compile with make

2004-01-18 Thread Paul D. Smith
s /bin/sh. Try this, as an experiment and send me the output: $ cd make-3.80/po $ /bin/sh -x ../config/mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: ht

Re: GNU Make 3.79.1 Bug-Report?

2004-01-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
on't have to "cd ..", because that happens automatically when the process ends. I don't know if whatever shell you're using with your port supports syntax like this or not. -- --- Pau

Re: 3.81 ... any dates for release

2004-01-25 Thread Paul D. Smith
here it doesn't (I have filed those as bugs in Savannah) and yes, we will do our best to get those fixed before the release of 3.81. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at:

Re: Enhancement request regarding make variable names

2004-01-25 Thread Paul D. Smith
d to apply. I would think you could use something like the subst function to do this, pretty easily. -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: 3.81 ... any dates for release

2004-01-26 Thread Paul D. Smith
andard for make. The move to C90 function definitions is already complete in CVS, if that's what you mean. However, the system uses the ansi2knr toolkit so it hopefully will still build with at least some pre-ISO compilers. -- ---

Re: creation of a directory

2004-01-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
o that "foo/" and "foo" are considered the same prerequisite. You can get your makefile to work like this: hello : | foo/. hello : @echo hello %/. : mkdir $* -- ------- Paul D. Smith

Re: filter-out, very slow?

2004-01-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
ords in the relative order they had in $(str2). -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm..

Re: creation of a directory

2004-01-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
know how to build ..." for one or more of them). bk> For example, $(dir) does not strip the trailing slash. Oh, but $(@D) bk> does... These are user functions. I'm talking about make's internal representation of the target name, that it uses to walk the DAG. -- --

Re: Make 3.80 does not build on LynxOS

2004-01-31 Thread Paul D. Smith
main.c in CVS and will be in the next release. If you want to test prereleases of GNU make to be sure they work on your favourite OS, subscribe to this mailing list: prereleases will be announced here. -- ----------- Pau

Re: Make Documentation

2004-02-02 Thread Paul D. Smith
gnu.org site though, if that's what you mean. Perhaps someone else rebuilt the docs with a newer version of texinfo or something. Can you give me links to the documentation you're referring to? -- --- Paul D.

Re: [7606] shell builtin "test" not invoked if appears alone

2004-02-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
use any other special character that would cause make to kick the command to the slow path? -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make

Re: [7606] shell builtin "test" not invoked if appears alone

2004-02-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
and is "test", whether "test" exists on the PATH, or whether it's a shell script, or anything like that. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu

Re: help needed

2004-02-09 Thread Paul D. Smith
results of the build are installed. Good luck! -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _

Re: Error

2004-02-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
g generated by some command that make is running (some command in your makefile). So, I'd look through your makefile for "expr" and find one that's used incorrectly. -- ------- Paul D. Smith &l

Re: make -j8 bootstrap failing on solaris. (for gcc-3.3.2)

2004-02-16 Thread Paul D. Smith
h other projects, I can recover via doing a subsequent esp> make. In this case, it seems to screw up both the current *and* esp> the subsequent makes. Since you didn't say what version of GNU make you're using it's hard to say. -- -

Re: Any help needed?

2004-02-16 Thread Paul D. Smith
t would be nice to ensure that, for example, adding in "r" to MAKEFLAGS takes effect properly. Also it's probably good to have MAKEFLAGS parsed every time it's changed so that the changes take effect immediately. Probably some others... -- --

Re: Any help needed?

2004-02-16 Thread Paul D. Smith
, etc. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional.&

Re: Build.sh failed on HP-UX 11i box

2004-02-18 Thread Paul D. Smith
ld just use that to build GNU make instead of the build.sh script. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org &quo

Re: suspected bug in flag -n, in make-3.80

2004-02-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
er supposed to exist then you should use the .PHONY pseudo target to tell make that: .PHONY: speak Then, make will behave as you expect both with -n and without it. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Errors compiling make.c

2004-02-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
ry editing make.h and change line 391 from this: #ifdef __STDC__ && __STDC__ to this: #if __STDC__ && HAVE_STDVARARGS and see if that helps. If not, be sure to include all the information asked for above. -- --------

Re: Bug#214592: dry-run of double-colon rules?

2004-02-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
o install foo.1 ms> echo install foo.2 ms> echo install done Most likely pmake behaves differently; it may always run all double-colon scripts, even if there's a satisfied prerequisite relationship. Try the above makefile with the touch lines in it: does it run all three rules even tho

Re: Bug#218367: make: strange behavior with multi-target rules

2004-02-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
cript doesn't update "junk" itself, make doesn't consider the two .tex files out of date (they are still newer than their prerequisite, "junk") so it doesn't rebuild modules.tex. If you change your rule so that it updates "junk", all will work as you ex

Re: make dumps core on empty filename

2004-02-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
e fix will be available in the next release. Thanks for your report! -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesle

Re: Bug#176639: make: documentation of VPATH does not match behavior

2004-02-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
more clear. This change will be available in the next release of GNU make. Thanks for your report! -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: Garbage characters in the output of make -np in the Linux source tree

2004-02-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist ___ Bug-m

Re: Autoconf/Automake versions needed to build make from CVS

2004-02-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
e files would constantly being committed with changes that moved them back and forth in all kinds of silly ways. We stopped doing that and life has been much happier since. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: Autoconf/Automake versions needed to build make from CVS

2004-02-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
'm not sure how snapshots like that would be published. I'll ask the GNU folks. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org h

Re: make/tests issues

2004-02-29 Thread Paul D. Smith
script for some reason jg> unknown to me. Perhaps the "purify" code in the report is jg> removing make.exe ? Why is the Purify code being invoked? It shouldn't be, unless you asked for it--which you shouldn't do if you don't have Purify. jg>

Re: make/tests issues

2004-03-01 Thread Paul D. Smith
reason for this is because the test script has decided that your system is running VMS. If you solve that problem I'm sure things will start working _MUCH_ better. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Hi

2004-03-02 Thread Paul D. Smith
ask this question on a list supporting Qt or kdevelop. Good luck! -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "

Re: GNU make 3.81beta1 released

2004-03-11 Thread Paul D. Smith
sing the sleep time will help? -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist

Re: return codes

2004-03-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
chapter "How to Run 'make'". -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm..

Re: Using % in a variable name as a static pattern prereq?

2004-03-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
ough of a reason to make this sort of backward-incompatible change to its behavior. Especially since you can do what you want to do with the $(eval ...) function. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: make error

2004-03-14 Thread Paul D. Smith
it any target to build, so it doesn't know what you want it to do, so it gives up. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://ma

Re: A bug in gmake?

2004-03-14 Thread Paul D. Smith
$ touch parser.c $ make parser.o Just as expected. Does my example show the same error as yours, on your system? -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: feature request

2004-03-18 Thread Paul D. Smith
a/*.java lisp/*.lisp) synctool java lisp syncdir @touch $@ Now whenever any file is newer than the sentinel file make will see that something has changed, and the synctool will be run, then the sentinel will be updated. -- --------

Re: line number mixup

2004-03-18 Thread Paul D. Smith
= nlines; nlines = readline (ebuf); + ebuf->floc.lineno += nlines; /* If there is nothing left to eval, we're done. */ if (nlines < 0) -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PATCH] RISC OS Support

2004-03-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Thanks, applied. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad,

Re: Recursive invocation of variable_expand_string bug version 3.80

2004-04-01 Thread Paul D. Smith
This bug has been fixed in the source. You can find a patch attached to bug # 1517 in Savannah. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.g

Re: wish: multiple target patterns in a static pattern rule

2004-04-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
ust use an implicit rule here in the first place. If you don't use implicit rules you'll have to be careful to use a dummy target if you want to have a single command line generate all those files: explicit (and static pattern) rules don't work like that. -- ---

Re: define strangeness

2004-04-16 Thread Paul D. Smith
ou saying that it should perform _ANOTHER_ round of backslash/newline resolution at some point during the parsing or expansion of variables? Exactly when? How will this impact backward compatibility? Or are some functions going to do it and others not? -- -------

Re: [PATCH] order-only prerequisite ends up in $

2004-04-19 Thread Paul D. Smith
Good stuff; thanks Boris. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be

Re: [PATCH] pattern-specific variable expansion

2004-04-19 Thread Paul D. Smith
use the above behavior is defined by POSIX and required of every program that calls itself "make". -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: [PATCH] order-only prerequisite ends up in $

2004-04-19 Thread Paul D. Smith
look in read.c line 537. The dumping code simply does not bk> distinguish between normal and order-only prerequisites. ITYM rule.c. I have a fix for this already but maybe I haven't checked it in yet. -- -------

Re: [PATCH] pattern-specific variable expansion

2004-04-19 Thread Paul D. Smith
o one behavior in this situation that works "as expected" in every case. I'm assuming all the regression tests still pass with your patch applied? I can't remember whether I added a test for this situation or not. -- --------

Re: [PATCH] order-only prerequisite ends up in $

2004-04-19 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Noel Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ny> Paul D. Smith wrote: >> %% Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bk> If you expect it to print >> bk> %r: | baz >> bk> then look in read.c line 537. The dumping code simply does not bk&

Re: define strangeness

2004-04-19 Thread Paul D. Smith
define: define subst echo $> | sed 's/#foo#/$(FOO)/' > $@ endef for example. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: Endless loop in Make 3.80 (Cygwin)

2004-04-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
ep env: @echo Target: environment touch env include dep Note this will run "env" only once, not twice. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: h

RE: Cygwin make thinks a statement can be neither true nor false....

2004-04-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
d shows that it does work as documented: .PHONY: all showfoo all: showfoo $(MAKE) showfoo MAKEFLAGS='FOO=1' showfoo: ; @echo 'FOO=$(FOO)' $ make FOO= make[1]: Entering directory `/home/psmith' FOO=1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/psmith'

RE: Cygwin make thinks a statement can be neither true nor false....

2004-04-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
(or four) things I know about, so ... eh?" dk> I'd just like to point out that it isn't only $shell that is dk> affected: $error and $warning are also affected. I also notice dk> that it works fine if you escape the semicolon: Right. This is a parser bug, pure and

Re: 'How makefiles are remade'

2004-04-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
l see if I can think of a way to do it. Alternatively you could move away from include and just start using eval... then you don't have to worry about re-exec at all. -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: 'How makefiles are remade'

2004-04-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
ry makefile:1: Reading makefile SECOND FIRST MAIN temp$ make makefile:1: Reading makefile SECOND FIRST MAIN I still think you may find using $(eval ...) to be overall simpler. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL

Re: 'How makefiles are remade'

2004-04-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: j> Paul D. Smith wrote: >> Yes it is, if you write it correctly. j> (sorry, this is such an attacking statement...) Sorry; I didn't mean it like that. I just meant you have to write it in a very specific way ("correctly"

Re: [PATCH] order-only prerequisite ends up in $

2004-04-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
27; junk.test is touched. This is a bug in make 3.80; it's been fixed already. You should try the 3.81beta1 release; it works there. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make

Re: [PATCH] pattern-specific variable expansion

2004-04-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
is change out. Thanks. -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am

RE: Cygwin make thinks a statement can be neither true nor false....

2004-04-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
suspect it would be a _LOT_ of work, and would need to use a lot of special features of whatever LR tool you chose. Something like PCCTS might be better suited :). -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Why % put in front of any shell derective?

2004-04-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
CON jp> % echo Please wait ... >CON jp> % echo >CON jp> %endif I don't know where you got this, but it's not a GNU make file. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: make -k doesn't notice failures to remake makefiles

2004-04-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
This fix looks correct. Thanks for the patch. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please

Re: a: $@.b

2004-04-25 Thread Paul D. Smith
matic variables are only defined in the command script. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please r

Re: Is this a bug in GNU make 3.80?

2004-04-27 Thread Paul D. Smith
This is a long-standing deficiency in the parsing of MAKEFLAGS. It's something we hope to fix. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: Is this a bug in GNU make 3.80?

2004-04-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
l Yes, I agree; I didn't realize it but you're right this ends up working the same way as giving -r on the command line (I guess they only way to tell the difference would be to add back some suffixes). -- --- Pa

Re: Windows path names and multiple targets.. bug in make 3.81?

2004-05-09 Thread Paul D. Smith
thing more than give them a cursory examination for obvious issues. -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "

Re: [RFC] .NOT_DEFAULT: target

2004-05-17 Thread Paul D. Smith
gt; $(out_root)/configuration: bk> configure $@ bk> include $(out_root)/configuration bk> comments? Mm. I don't know about this. It seems like it's the wrong way around... if what you want to have is the default target, why have people declare everything that _cannot_ be

Re: say how to change PATH

2004-05-17 Thread Paul D. Smith
dj> $P; which faubackup ??? You can set PATH to a value that includes itself in the exact same way you can set any other variable to a value that includes itself: you use simply-expanded variables: PATH := /usr/sbin:$(PATH) -- -----

Re: failing "make install" because missing lib

2004-05-26 Thread Paul D. Smith
lem is with the makefile generated to build the gphoto application: that's not a problem with make. You'll need to contact the developers for gphoto and ask them about this issue. Good luck! -- ------- Paul D

Re: whether make or the manual on make, a hole this big is a bug

2004-06-02 Thread Paul D. Smith
imes in a makefile, and add prerequisites to it as often as you like. But, every singe target can have one and only one set of commands to be run. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make

Re: unable to gnerate the make.exe file

2004-06-07 Thread Paul D. Smith
resolved external Symbol _hash_init This bug has been fixed and will be available in the next release. You can find more info here: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=1687 -- ------- Paul D. Smith <

Re: Build from source failed using just the shell scripts, but was ok using pre-existing make

2004-06-07 Thread Paul D. Smith
ch> the ./configure script, I assume my system satisfies all requirements, ch> right? Yes. -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: List of available targets in a variable?

2004-06-07 Thread Paul D. Smith
ould get back to it and implement it correctly. -- ----------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm.

Re: Problem with @ option on SUN

2004-06-14 Thread Paul D. Smith
This is a bug in GNU make 3.79.1. It's been fixed in newer versions. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulan

Re: make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop.

2004-06-15 Thread Paul D. Smith
Your problem is almost certainly an instance of an eval bug in 3.80. See this report (and the included patch): https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=1517 -- --- Paul D. Smith <

Re: New feature request: handling timestamps if a target or a prerequisite file is a link

2004-06-17 Thread Paul D. Smith
Please choose just one of the make mailing lists to send a particular email to. Thanks! -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: confusion over eval and warning

2004-06-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
s just a general rule; for example since $(ALL_BASE) is a constant you don't have to escape that, if you don't want to, etc.) -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: htt

Re: Two bugs in one

2004-06-23 Thread Paul D. Smith
t you do get the KEEP. jvh> 1:no 2:yes This is correct. See the GNU make manual definition of what ifdef does. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: $(eval) in ifdefs

2004-06-23 Thread Paul D. Smith
the CVS archives, etc. https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/make/ Have fun! -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandles

Re: make inconsistent

2004-06-29 Thread Paul D. Smith
_SOURCE=500 -Wall -Werror -g sn> all: $(PROJ) sn> $(PROJ): $(OBJS) sn> $(OBJS): $(SOURCE) -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org

Re: make 3.80 eval/variable_buffer bug

2004-06-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
ied it and it doesn't, or just that you've looked at the code and it doesn't look different? If the latter, please give it a try. If the former, please provide a sample makefile that shows the problem. -- --------

Re: [BUG???] Targets within variables

2004-06-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
in fact a bug, or if the first km> case is merely an unsupported feature, in which case I'd like to km> request such a feature. On the other hand, perhaps there is a km> better way to do what I need to do. Make sure you have GNU make 3.80 or better, and look up the $(eval ...) f

Re: target-specific 'define'd variables (3.80)?

2004-07-05 Thread Paul D. Smith
$(myvar) -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a pr

Re: target-specific 'define'd variables (3.80)?

2004-07-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bk> "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> %% Will Partain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> wp> Hi; I don't know if the little Makefile below *ought* to wp> work or not; i

Re: target-specific 'define'd variables (3.80)?

2004-07-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: pds> I don't see any reason technically that it couldn't be done. The pds> parser would need to be massaged somewhat. I can't remember pds> whether the function that parses define/endef also creates

Re: target-specific 'define'd variables (3.80)?

2004-07-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bk> Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I don't see any reason technically that it couldn't be done. bk> That's what I thought too. Also it would be nice to extend the concept bk> of target/

Re: make automatically remove and ignore a dependency files specified in a non static rule

2004-07-07 Thread Paul D. Smith
anual. Cheers! -- ------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a prof

Re: goto and macro usage

2004-07-11 Thread Paul D. Smith
d to be fixed. Please don't give up suggesting ways to clean up the code... it's not that I'm not interested, but I do have other priorities as well. Thanks! -- --- Paul D. Smith <[

Re: goto and macro usage

2004-07-12 Thread Paul D. Smith
this id-utils library installed even if it did exist (in fact probably nothing but Linux would), so in order to depend on it we'd need to include it in the source code distribution... as we're doing. -- --- P

<    11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   >