I upgraded a Mac to 10.8.2 and Xcode 4.5.2 over the break, now I'm
trying to get the jdk7u/jdk7u-dev, jdk8/tl and jigsaw/jigsaw forests
building again. I installed XQuartz 2.7.2 so I have X11 and jdk8/tl
builds fine with the new build (except for the "images" target, there's
an issue with sed
On 7 jan 2013, at 10:43, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> I upgraded a Mac to 10.8.2 and Xcode 4.5.2 over the break, now I'm trying to
> get the jdk7u/jdk7u-dev, jdk8/tl and jigsaw/jigsaw forests building again. I
> installed XQuartz 2.7.2 so I have X11 and jdk8/tl builds fine with the new
> build (e
On 07/01/2013 10:03, Joel Borggrén-Franck wrote:
On 7 jan 2013, at 10:43, Alan Bateman wrote:
I upgraded a Mac to 10.8.2 and Xcode 4.5.2 over the break, now I'm trying to get the
jdk7u/jdk7u-dev, jdk8/tl and jigsaw/jigsaw forests building again. I installed XQuartz
2.7.2 so I have X11 and jd
hi Kelly,
It's great to see these changes about to go mainstream. Really appreciate
everyones effort in making this happen. I have a few questions though
(apologies if you've already answered them elsewhere)
1 - What does 'a limited time' mean when referring to being able to use the
old m
2012/12/16 Kelly O'Hair :
> Looks ok to me. But do the makefile comments need to be adjusted?
The makefile comments, comment on the fact that Java sources that
reside inside make/tools
are in fact part of the dt.jar (ie part of the jdk, not just a tool).
However this is not that easy to fix, sin
On 07/01/2013 13:57, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
:
The makefile comments, comment on the fact that Java sources that
reside inside make/tools
are in fact part of the dt.jar (ie part of the jdk, not just a tool).
However this is not that easy to fix, since the actual tool that
generates the swing cla
2012/12/18 Sergey Malenkov :
> Looks OK to me. But there are a lot of images in the
> make/tools/swing-beans/beaninfo/images folder. Could you please check the
> make/javax/swing/beaninfo/SwingBeans.gmk file to ensure that the dt.jar
> library will be packed correctly?
Yes, I have verified that
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Excuse the wide mailing, but it was important to try and reach anyone
> building jdk8.
>
> The jdk8/build repositories at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build have
> been changed to use the new
> build-infra "configure&make" build setup, so i
Hi Volker:
I always thought that the
MinGW build would be the default for the
new build systems but reading your mail this apparently isn't true.
Will the MinGW build just not be the default one or will it not work / not
be supported at all?
If not, will the MinGW changes just get lost in the o
On Jan 7, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
> Hi Volker:
>
>> I always thought that the
>> MinGW build would be the default for the
>> new build systems but reading your mail this apparently isn't true.
>>
>> Will the MinGW build just not be the default one or will it not work / not
>> be suppo
On Jan 7, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Steve Poole wrote:
> hi Kelly,
>
> It's great to see these changes about to go mainstream. Really appreciate
> everyones effort in making this happen. I have a few questions though
> (apologies if you've already answered them elsewhere)
>
> 1 - What does 'a limi
If someone could document everything that was done to get this working I would
appreciate it.
We have a bunch of 10.8 macs that we need to figure out how to get them to
build the jdk for 10.7
or we have to come up with a better answer.
I assume Mac 10.7 support in jdk7u and jdk8 will continue, b
Did a bug report get filed for this issue?
-kto
On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
> Hi Volker,
> Yes, I think so. The comment is pasted below.
> /**
> * org/omg/PortableServer/Current.java .
> * 由IDL-to-Java 编译器 (可移植), 版本 "3.2"生成
> * 从../../../../src/share/classes/org/omg/PortableS
In order for the bits created on 10.8 to work on 10.7 (which is what we
ultimately need), there was
supposedly some kind of compiler option we need to make sure was used on all
compiles.
I don't have that spelling on the option right now, apparently beehive deleted
my email stash. :^(
-kto
O
-mmacosx-version-min=version ?
-DrD-
> In order for the bits created on 10.8 to work on 10.7 (which is what we
> ultimately need), there was
> supposedly some kind of compiler option we need to make sure was used on all
> compiles.
>
> I don't have that spelling on the option right now, appa
Yeah, that's it -mmacosx-version-min=10.7
it needs to be added to all compile and link lines as I recall.
-kto
On Jan 7, 2013, at 1:05 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
> -mmacosx-version-min=version ?
>
> -DrD-
>
>> In order for the bits created on 10.8 to work on 10.7 (which is what we
>> ult
Changeset: 7a3c6ffdf1fb
Author:tbell
Date: 2013-01-07 14:01 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/7a3c6ffdf1fb
8005442: autogen.sh sets DATE_WHEN_GENERATED to empty string on Solaris version
11 or later
Reviewed-by: ohair
! common/autoconf/autogen.sh
Yes, generally added to CFLAGS. Both compilers (clang and gcc) support this
option and will also pick up MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET from the environment if
-mmacosx-version-min is not given on the command line. By default this is set
to the version of the OS it was built on, so if someone builds
So all we need to do is:
export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7
???
That would be easy.
-kto
On Jan 7, 2013, at 3:32 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
> Yes, generally added to CFLAGS. Both compilers (clang and gcc) support this
> option and will also pick up MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET from the enviro
On 2013-01-07, at 2:41 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> If someone could document everything that was done to get this working I
> would appreciate it.
>
> We have a bunch of 10.8 macs that we need to figure out how to get them to
> build the jdk for 10.7
> or we have to come up with a better answer
Yeah, that should work, as long as make is set up to handle the environment
correctly :)
-DrD-
> So all we need to do is:
>
> export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7
>
> ???
>
> That would be easy.
>
> -kto
>
> On Jan 7, 2013, at 3:32 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, generally added to
>> Thanks that works (although I run into the same issue as the new build with
>> sed when building images).
I have GNU sed installed via MacPorts and pass SED=/opt/local/bin/gsed to make.
-DrD-
>
> New build worked last time I tried it; I will try again after sending this
> email.
New build (jdk8tl) confirmed to (still) work on MacOS 10.8.2 with recent
Developer Tools and XQuartz.
(I got as far as running a properties-printer with the built system.)
David
Hi Kelly,
I have filed a bug whose internal review id is 2421470. It was filed
with "Product/Category" being "JDK/JRE" and "Subcategory" being
"Problems common to more than one tool". I am wondering since it only
happens when building OpenJDK, is it eligible for a Java bug?
In addition, d
24 matches
Mail list logo
