Changeset: 5fdc44652089
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/5fdc44652089
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset 8d07115924b7
! .hgtags
Changeset: 0fb1a427fbf6
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/nashorn/rev/0fb1a427fbf6
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset f0d3ac2474ee
! .hgtags
Changeset: 3c040b04af05
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/3c040b04af05
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset 6b4d6205366c
! .hgtags
Changeset: a389b4f5723f
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/a389b4f5723f
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset f82b730c798b
! .hgtags
Changeset: 0dc0067f3b8e
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-11-11 15:06 -0800
URL: http://h
Changeset: 587560c222a2
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/587560c222a2
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset e126d8eca69b
! .hgtags
Changeset: e757eb9aee3d
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/e757eb9aee3d
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset f610fd46463e
! .hgtags
Changeset: 842b6ce4dfb4
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/842b6ce4dfb4
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset 9ebaac78a8a0
! .hgtags
Changeset: 40e892e2a4f2
Author:cl
Date: 2013-11-07 08:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/40e892e2a4f2
Added tag jdk8-b115 for changeset 763ada2a1d8c
! .hgtags
Changeset: cbfe5da942c6
Author:katleman
Date: 2013-11-11 15:06 -0800
URL: http://hg.op
On 2013-11-11 20:06, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
See http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/ for the procedure for
adding new tools to the Code Tools project.
Thanks for the pointer! I've posted a proposal to the code-tools list.
/Magnus
On 11/11/2013 10:27 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
11 nov 2013 kl. 18:01 skrev Jonathan Gibbons
mailto:jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com>>:
Making it easier to get a copy of jtreg and other tools, is a worthy
goal, and may even involve building those tools when necessary. But,
I don't think it is
>
> 11 nov 2013 kl. 18:01 skrev Jonathan Gibbons :
>
> Making it easier to get a copy of jtreg and other tools, is a worthy goal,
> and may even involve building those tools when necessary. But, I don't think
> it is sensible to clone "additional" repos into an OpenJDK forest. Earlier,
> this
On 11/11/2013 3:29 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-08 19:51, Joe Darcy wrote:
On 11/08/2013 06:27 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-08 14:46, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 08/11/2013 13:33, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
So if we take this one in through tl, I assume we have to do one
t
Mikhail,
J4B is a private flag used in the closed install/deploy repos. It's not
suitable for discussion on OpenJDK.
I'll get back to you on this off mailing list.
regards,
Sean.
On 11/11/13 14:03, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
Hi all,
how to build J4B?
What flags should I pass to make or what e
On 11/11/2013 02:20 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-08 16:54, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 11/08/2013 12:22 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
If we can achieve both the goal of moving the webrev script away
from being tied to a specific jdk repo, and still let everyone keep
their scripts/co
Hi all,
how to build J4B?
What flags should I pass to make or what env variables should I define?
Thanks,
Mikhail.
On 11/11/2013 13:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
There is no real hurry for this. I think it would be ideal to go into
tl just after the snapshot; then we'll have longest possible time to
test before integration to master.
We're awaiting SQE test results which are due Wednesday morning PT.
Un
On 2013-11-11 12:53, Alan Bateman wrote:
I just checked and it looks like that are only 3 or 4 changes in
jdk8/build that are not in jdk8/tl. Are these going into jdk8/jdk8
this week?
I assume that.
As regards timing then jdk8/tl currently has ~50 changes backed up for
jdk8-b117. Lana usually
Hi Magnus,
thanks for your understanding:) I think it's not really the changes
which are good changes by themselves. I think it's the development
model and the fact that the integration takes so much time and that we
ran into the jdk8 closing time frame.
We will have one more round of integration
On 11/11/2013 11:29, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I agree. Pushing through TL will expose the patch to more testing and
will make it easier to patch it. I think you are right that this is
what we should do with this patch.
However, I'm still worried that there will be a need to manually
resolv
On 2013-11-08 19:51, Joe Darcy wrote:
On 11/08/2013 06:27 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-08 14:46, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 08/11/2013 13:33, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
So if we take this one in through tl, I assume we have to do one
the following:
* Accept that there will be potentia
On 2013-11-08 18:37, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
this is a webrev which fixes the build on AIX again after the latest
jdk8/mainline version (including 8025715) was integrated into the
ppc-aix-port/stage repository:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8028066
It actually redoes the change
On 2013-11-08 16:54, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 11/08/2013 12:22 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
If we can achieve both the goal of moving the webrev script away from
being tied to a specific jdk repo, and still let everyone keep their
scripts/command lines/etc intact, I can't see the harm in tha
On 2013-11-08 15:57, Alexander Zuev wrote:
Hello,
please review my fix for the issue JDK-8027900: pack200 option is
broken due to the incorrect makefile definition for its driver
The problem is that in the definition of the pack200 native launcher
we added explicit option "--pack"
This
23 matches
Mail list logo
