Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread David Holmes
On 14/11/2014 5:36 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: An attachment in the email has been found to contain executable code and has been removed. File removed : webrev.zip, zip,html,js Unclear what removed the attachment. :( David ---

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi David, I’ve got a mail that the attachment was too big and was held by the moderator approval. I personally would love to put that on cr.openjdk.java.net but to put it there it seems that I fist has to be contributor and in order to be that I had be submit some

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> 13 nov 2014 kl. 19:33 skrev Christian Thalinger > : > > >> On Nov 13, 2014, at 6:09 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie >> wrote: >> >>> On 2014-11-10 11:32, Volker Simonis wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Erik Joelsson >>> wrote: On 2014-11-10 10:27, Volker Simonis wrote: > On Mo

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
Hi Patrick, I'm sorry for all the trouble you have encountered when trying to help improving OpenJDK. :( Try sending the patch only (not the webrev), as normal inlined text (not an attachment) in a mail to the list. I can create a webrev and put it on cr.openjdk.java.net for you. /Magnus >

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Magnus Unfortunately the patch itself is as big as 2 megabytes and will therefore get removed… Now I’m really stuck. Cheers Patrick > Am 14.11.2014 um 09:45 schrieb Magnus Ihse Bursie > : > > Hi Patrick, > > I'm sorry for all the trouble you have encountered when trying to help > improv

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello Patrick, try reverting common/autoconf/generated-configure before generating the patch. That file does not need to be reviewed as it's just generated anyway. That should reduce the patch size. /Erik On 2014-11-14 09:54, Patrick Reinhart wrote: Hi Magnus Unfortunately the patch itself i

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Erik / Magnus, See attachment… Patrick > Am 14.11.2014 um 10:26 schrieb Erik Joelsson : > > Hello Patrick, try reverting common/autoconf/generated-configure before > generating the patch. That file does not need to be reviewed as it's just > generated anyway. That should reduce the patch

Re: visual-studio-community?

2014-11-14 Thread Wang Weijun
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 21:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie > wrote: > > My guess is that the Visual Studio detection code in common/autoconf needs > updating to locate the tools. Looks like vs2013 is not supported yet. If as Microsoft described the community version is full-featured it should be equiva

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Here is the patch also as inlined text: --- old/common/autoconf/help.m4 2014-11-14 10:32:44.0 +0100 +++ new/common/autoconf/help.m4 2014-11-14 10:32:44.0 +0100 @@ -75,20 +75,18 @@ HELP_MSG="You might be able to fix this by running '$PKGHANDLER_COMMAND'." ;; free

Re: visual-studio-community?

2014-11-14 Thread Ivan Krylov
Are you looking at just the hotspot builds within VS or entire JDK? I am not sure that the VS makes a great java editor, so I've only looked at the hotspot part. Previously hotspot had a VS project generator and even though it would generate VS2010 projects - those would be fine within VS2010. T

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-14 Thread Dean Long
On 11/14/2014 12:39 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: 13 nov 2014 kl. 19:33 skrev Christian Thalinger : On Nov 13, 2014, at 6:09 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-11-10 11:32, Volker Simonis wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: On 2014-11-10 10:27, Volker Simoni

Re: RFR(S) Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix for 8033602 and 8034005

2014-11-14 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
> I presume I don't need to sent out another webrev... I have to change my mind on this because this fix needs to be backported to JDK8u-hs-dev. Here's the updated JDK9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8033602-webrev/1-jdk9-hs-rt/ And here's the JDK8u-hs-dev backport: http://cr.open