Hi Dave,
common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh stills contains an IBM copyright
notice. Was it regenerated?
Thanks,
David
On 26/11/2013 12:46 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
Hi David ,
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:34 +, Dave Pointon wrote:
Hi David ,
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 01:45 +1000, David
Hi David ,
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 01:45 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
snip
Please do. I moved the JI issue to JDK:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028794
Not sure what your plans was for getting this pushed but we are in a
phase were an approval process has to be followed to make
Hi again, Magnus ,
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 00:35 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
On 21/11/2013 11:05 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-19 13:47, Dave Pointon wrote:
The updated webrev can be found at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngmr/JI-9008287/webrev.02/
The actual code looks better,
On 21/11/2013 11:05 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-19 13:47, Dave Pointon wrote:
The updated webrev can be found at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngmr/JI-9008287/webrev.02/
The actual code looks better, but I'm not so sure about the copyright
header. The actual change was indeed very
On 22/11/2013 1:02 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
Hi again, Magnus ,
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 00:35 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
On 21/11/2013 11:05 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-19 13:47, Dave Pointon wrote:
The updated webrev can be found at
Hi David ,
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 06:28 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 19/11/2013 1:34 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
snip
Minor style nit but note that the pattern used everywhere is x$FOO = x.
So changing to use j or r is undesirable.
OK, TFT. It was merely an obviously misguided
On 2013-11-18 21:28, David Holmes wrote:
MOre generally this seems solvable simply by changing the existing
error message to an executable binary file for could not be
found - and the user could see if it was missing or just not marked
executable. :)
I agree with David.
The solution
Hi Magnus ,
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:15 +0100, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
snip
I have a hard time believing it is a common problem that a JDK
installation exists, where the executable permission is missing. So it's
reasonable to have this as a last time check, and not as part of the
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:03 +, Dave Pointon wrote:
Hi Magnus ,
snip
I don't disagree - with the benefit of hindsight + invaluable insight
provided by the group, I think that I am reading far too much into the
problem I encountered whilst building, or attempting to build, the IBM
Hi again all ,
Having encountered the above defect and implemented a/the solution, I
would appreciate your feedback /or comment.
Thanks to Neil Richards, the exploded webrev can be found at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngmr/JI-9008287/webrev.01/
Note that, if it isn't already obvious, the defect
Hi Dave,
On 19/11/2013 1:34 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
Hi again all ,
Having encountered the above defect and implemented a/the solution, I
would appreciate your feedback /or comment.
Thanks to Neil Richards, the exploded webrev can be found at
11 matches
Mail list logo
