On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Joe Darcy joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
A broader question this issue raises is why are components like corba
built using the book JDK rather than the JDK they are a part of?
As Alan said, for historical reasons only. If you wanted to actually
compile
As I recall, corba builds do some code generation with idlj, which is in corba
I think, so a boot jdk version of idlj
would need to be built and run with the boot jdk, then you could build
everything with the new jdk.
Or so I recall..
-kto
On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:54 PM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
You are right Kelly, the old build system did use the idlj from the boot
jdk.
The new build, does build a bootstrap idlj, as can be seen here:
he
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/corba/file/14e7fbdd1dcb/make/GensrcCorba.gmk
And uses this bootstrap idlj to compile the idl files, so at least
Good to hear.
-kto
On Apr 4, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
You are right Kelly, the old build system did use the idlj from the boot jdk.
The new build, does build a bootstrap idlj, as can be seen here:
he
We had problems in jdk9/dev in the last day or so where there were
changes pushed to the corba repo that use APIs that are new in JDK 8.
This caused problems when building jdk9/dev with a 7uX build as the boot
JDK and made it obvious that there are a mix of boot JDKs in use (some
people use
I don't see any reason not to make the switch. I filed this bug back in
December:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030794
/Erik
On 2014-04-03 10:43, Alan Bateman wrote:
We had problems in jdk9/dev in the last day or so where there were
changes pushed to the corba repo that use APIs
On 03/04/2014 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't see any reason not to make the switch. I filed this bug back
in December:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030794
Thanks, I can't think of any reason either.
So how do we make this happen? Would a mail to jdk9-dev be sufficient to
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
On 3 Apr 2014, at 11:04, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't see any reason not to make the switch. I filed this
On 03/04/2014 11:12, Chris Hegarty wrote:
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
I know but I also replied suggesting that he hold off pending a
conclusion on the boot JDK issue. If this is pushed then it's the
Don't we also need to modify jprt properties?
David
On 3/04/2014 8:12 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
On 3 Apr 2014, at 11:04, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On
On 3 Apr 2014, at 11:16, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:12, Chris Hegarty wrote:
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
I know but I also replied suggesting that he hold off
On 2014-04-03 12:24, Seán Coffey wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:17, David Holmes wrote:
Don't we also need to modify jprt properties?
Which properties need changing David ? We should list them.
The strange thing here is that JPRT is already using JDK 8 (b132) as
bootstrap. That's how the CORBA
As Chris pointed out, we have a patch that's already been reviewed, so
making the change is trivial. I do think a bit of a heads up to jdk9-dev
is a good idea though.
/Erik
On 2014-04-03 12:04, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/04/2014 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't see any reason not to make
The general plan had been to wait until Java 8 was final before switching from
JDK 7 to JDK 8. We planned switch internal Oracle build systems to JDK 8 after
the April 15th CPU release. However, since there seems to already be a mix of
JDK 7 and JDK 8 in use it is probably appropriate to switch
A broader question this issue raises is why are components like corba
built using the book JDK rather than the JDK they are a part of?
-Joe
On 04/03/2014 01:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
We had problems in jdk9/dev in the last day or so where there were
changes pushed to the corba repo that
On 03/04/2014 16:53, Joe Darcy wrote:
A broader question this issue raises is why are components like corba
built using the book JDK rather than the JDK they are a part of?
As I understand it, the new build compiles the repositories in this
order so that it matches the old build. In previous
On 04/03/2014 09:33 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Joe Darcy joe.da...@oracle.com
mailto:joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
A broader question this issue raises is why are components like
corba built using the book JDK rather than the JDK they are a part of?
17 matches
Mail list logo
