On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:24:09 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> This is an attempt to fix the issue reported in JDK-8291444.
>
> The check for secrets.JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER should only be applied to the push
> event but not on e.g. workflow_dispatch.
> Currently setting JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER would lead to
> This is an attempt to fix the issue reported in JDK-8291444.
>
> The check for secrets.JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER should only be applied to the push
> event but not on e.g. workflow_dispatch.
> Currently setting JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER would lead to setting every platform to
> 'false', even when manually tri
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 22:20:00 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> For some reason, we never turned on `-Werror` for javadoc. It is high time to
> do so.
>
> This PR also fixes a recent issue with the javadoc in JFR that caused a
> warning, and enables building of javadoc on GHA. (It takes about 3 m
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 20:50:04 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> In JDK-8297041, the javacserver was moved out of the JDK itself, and lifted
> out as a separate buildtool. Due to this, internal classes in jdk.compiler
> were no longer available. Therefore, the closest way to calling javac as
> be
> In JDK-8297041, the javacserver was moved out of the JDK itself, and lifted
> out as a separate buildtool. Due to this, internal classes in jdk.compiler
> were no longer available. Therefore, the closest way to calling javac as
> before were to use `com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile()`. This me
> In JDK-8297041, the javacserver was moved out of the JDK itself, and lifted
> out as a separate buildtool. Due to this, internal classes in jdk.compiler
> were no longer available. Therefore, the closest way to calling javac as
> before were to use `com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile()`. This me
> In JDK-8297041, the javacserver was moved out of the JDK itself, and lifted
> out as a separate buildtool. Due to this, internal classes in jdk.compiler
> were no longer available. Therefore, the closest way to calling javac as
> before were to use `com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile()`. This me
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:54:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Now that the javacserver no longer has any ambitions outside being a
> buildtool customized for the JDK build process, a lot of abstractions and
> generalizations can be removed.
>
> This will allow the actual behavior to be more cl
> Now that the javacserver no longer has any ambitions outside being a
> buildtool customized for the JDK build process, a lot of abstractions and
> generalizations can be removed.
>
> This will allow the actual behavior to be more clearly visible, and will help
> debugging the issues we are st
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 20:50:04 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> In JDK-8297041, the javacserver was moved out of the JDK itself, and lifted
> out as a separate buildtool. Due to this, internal classes in jdk.compiler
> were no longer available. Therefore, the closest way to calling javac as
> be
For some reason, we never turned on `-Werror` for javadoc. It is high time to
do so.
This PR also fixes a recent issue with the javadoc in JFR that caused a
warning, and enables building of javadoc on GHA. (It takes about 3 minutes, as
a separate build job.)
-
Commit messages:
-
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:36:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Now that the javacserver no longer has any ambitions outside being a
>> buildtool customized for the JDK build process, a lot of abstractions and
>> generalizations can be removed.
>>
>> This will allow the actual behavior to be mo
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 18:53:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Usual start-of-release updates. Symbol updates in initial version reflect
>> JDK 20 build 21.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated change
> Usual start-of-release updates. Symbol updates in initial version reflect JDK
> 20 build 21.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by
the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:44:12 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg `7.1`.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the requiredVersi
The UTIL macros have several problematic flaws that may not seem apparent
initially, the worst of which include parsing commas as actual argument
separators to the underlying m4 macros, and completely, but very subtly
wrecking shell constructs. I've done my best here to fix some of these issues
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:24:09 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> This is an attempt to fix the issue reported in JDK-8291444.
>
> The check for secrets.JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER should only be applied to the push
> event but not on e.g. workflow_dispatch.
> Currently setting JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER would lead to
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:24:09 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> This is an attempt to fix the issue reported in JDK-8291444.
>
> The check for secrets.JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER should only be applied to the push
> event but not on e.g. workflow_dispatch.
> Currently setting JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER would lead to
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:24:09 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> This is an attempt to fix the issue reported in JDK-8291444.
>
> The check for secrets.JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER should only be applied to the push
> event but not on e.g. workflow_dispatch.
> Currently setting JDK_SUBMIT_FILTER would lead to
19 matches
Mail list logo
