ha, rightthanks :-)
using
namespace App\Model\Behavior;
solved the problem!
Am Dienstag, 29. Juli 2014 04:33:38 UTC+2 schrieb euromark:
Why are you using
namespace Cake\Model\Behavior;
in your behavior?
The namespace should cleary be App\...
mark
Am Montag, 28. Juli 2014
Too sad to hear cache helper is removed. This ESI based replacement is it
going to be in stable 3.0 version?
On Monday, July 28, 2014 10:13:14 AM UTC+3, José Lorenzo wrote:
CacheHelper has been removed from CakePHP. The core team feels that the
functionality this helper provided is best
That does the trick for me, thx a lot!
BUT, I found out that when you use it in a behavior: it won't work at all.
The array is shown as when you don't use the virtual fields:
array(
(int) 0 = array(
'CmsPage' = array(
'id' = '2',
'name' = 'Pagina's',
'lft' = '2',
Sorry, my bad! I forgot to change the virtual field declaration to
$model-virtualFields['depth'] = 0;
Thanks anyway ;)
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
HK why would you miss it? There will be no replacement for the cache
helper. We recommend using Varnish, which provides the ESI tags. They are
similar to the cache tags but they involve internally doing another
request. We think this is a more robust and scalable solution than doing it
in PHP.
For small sites that I develop is very helpful. The need to
use/configure/monitor extra software like varnish is pain in the ass,
especially if you don't have big sites to host.
On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:28:17 AM UTC+3, José Lorenzo wrote:
HK why would you miss it? There will be no
For those small sites, is having full page cache actually needed? I would
guess that performance wouldn't be a big concern in those cases
On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:47:16 AM UTC+2, HK wrote:
For small sites that I develop is very helpful. The need to
use/configure/monitor extra software
Why isn't needed? Why do I have to bother the server with more proccessing?
I have for example a (medium size) VPS with 40+ domains. Some of them use
cakePHP, and hopefully more in the future.
While each site is rather small (some with many pageviews though) all of
them are hosted on the same
If you use good caching of expensive database requests, and offload static
files to a CDN there is no need to bother with full page caching for most sites.
Our CMS with warm caches can display a somewhat complicated page in about
100-200 ms ...
/thomas
On 29 Jul 2014, at 12:22, HK
Yeah, that's basically my point. We have no full page cache in our site and
actually very limited use of caching in general, we can serve pages under
50ms and most of them under 100.
On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 12:54:09 PM UTC+2, Thomas von Hassel wrote:
If you use good caching of expensive
10 matches
Mail list logo
