Your brackets aren't balanced. One of the earlier replies had the
correct syntax though.
Try:
$count = $this->Project->Message->find('count', array
('Message.project_id' => $MyProjectId));
On Dec 29, 6:09 am, piyushsharmajec wrote:
> Hai,
> Thanks for your help however i find error as
> unex
This is in there because Cake's forms can support the additional
methods such as PUT and DELETE that are needed for RESTful
applications, but that aren't supported by browsers as yet. Originally
the input field was not inside a fieldset, however that (according to
the W3C validator, amongst others
I can't be the only one thinking this while reading this thread - but
it sounds like the server operator is excessively paranoid, keeping
the system locked down far beyond what it needs to be. I'd suggest
finding an alternate place to host your sites, it just sounds like
this is going to cause nig
I think the thinking is that, by not including external solutions
wherever possible, it keeps the licensing clean, making it easier for
bigger companies to adopt for their own projects. The trouble with
including most external libraries is that they're GPLed, which tends
to mean that the entire so
Or you could do what I've done in the past on several occasions and
create a plugin called 'admin', which will allow you to have URLs such
as /admin/users/add.
Works fairly well, and you can define a separate layout just by
including in your plugin a /views/layouts/default.ctp file.
On Jun 5, 6
I used "RewriteBase /" after RewriteEngine on, and the Cake apps I've
deployed to our 1&1 hosting seem to work fine. You'll need to insert
the RewriteBase directive in each of the 3 .htaccess files.
On Jun 2, 9:08 pm, robbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have a problem, my local A
I'm only guessing here, but perhaps the layout being used to render
the shadowbox doesn't including the JS libraries in the header? I
can't be sure, I no longer use the Ajax helper as I prefer jQuery to
Prototype :)
On Jun 2, 8:09 pm, Kyle Decot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using an ajax lin
My suggestion would be to go with your initial idea. It's workable,
it'd take some fiddling with the code to make it work correctly
however. But you could achieve most of what you'd need with a bit of
code in the afterFind method of your model.
On May 31, 4:26 pm, spamec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
If you're trying to bring an old website into Cake, now is the time to
use 1.2 instead of the old 1.1. It'll be stable very soon now (I have
faith in the dev team), so you're best off sticking with the newest
and best.
To get the information out that you're looking for, try using (in
1.2):
$i =
Basically, it looks like the Auth data is not refreshed on each page
load. I can understand why you wouldn't want to do this - performance
notwithstanding - but I've run into a few issues with it myself
(primarily dealing with having an online store where the customer
could change their email addr
I believe I used this method:
'last_login' => '!-NOW()'
Which makes Cake stop trying to quote it. But I'm pretty sure the
latest SVN revision recognises NOW() and doesn't quote it anyway.
Maybe I'm confused.
Steve
On May 22, 2:12 am, Alex Ciobanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zifnab wrote:
> >
uirement that search results
> can be bookmarked so the easy way to do this is using GET.
>
> Hope this info helps :-)
>
> On 17 mei, 00:56, Stephen Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm having trouble understanding why you'd want to use GET for
> >
I'm having trouble understanding why you'd want to use GET for
something... what's the specific situation you're attempting?
Steve
On May 16, 7:48 pm, the_woodsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But it just doesn't make any sense to me that input names
> > are stripped to the column names of a t
I think it depends which Cake version you're using, but I'm pretty
sure now the preferred method of saving is:
$this->Model->create($this->data);
$this->Model->save();
I'm not sure if this changed between 1.1 and 1.2, but I'm using 1.2
and this technique works perfectly. I usually wrap it in a c
The answer seems to be because some people believe that a wiki is the
solution to all of mankind's problems. I'd rather see people
contributing to the main docs personally, since it was launched the
Book has really helped me get answers faster (there's still some
things I need to refer to the API
> findAll(array('Table.categoryt' <> "A" )
This definitely won't work.
The array('Table.categoryt' => 'A') part follows PHP syntax, where =>
denotes a relationship between the key of the array and the value.
To have a condition where you want rows that DON'T match, use
array('Table.categoryt' =>
gt; run in MySQL properly. Shouldn't cake be producing rather similar SQL
> from 1.1 to 1.2? It's a simple query after all.
>
> Or are there strict version compatibilities between Cake versions and
> MySQL versions? Is that documented?
>
> I
>
> On Apr
Of course, there's no reason you couldn't achieve those preferred URLs
by using custom routes.
Stephen
On Apr 15, 4:00 pm, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 10, 1:18 am, majna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My suggestion is controller/action/slug solution. Sometimes
oding something up, I could be wrong.
Stephen
On Apr 15, 3:47 pm, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Orr wrote:
> > I can't answer all your points, but in theory, you could probably
> > achieve what you're aiming for in (2) by
What it sounds like is that he's trying to use the updated $this-
>Model->find('all'.) syntax from Cake 1.2 in the older version.
Best bet is to either upgrade, or use the old $this->Model-
>findAll($conditions) syntax.
Steve
On Apr 15, 8:44 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Without knowing exactly what files you have there, I can't really
solve the problem.
But, to make a plugin work, this is what you need:
A folder in plugins called whatever your plugin should be called
(hereafter referred to as $plugin).
Within that folder, 2 files - $plugin_app_controller.php a
MySQL specifically disallows an ID of 0. I've tested this manually by
inserting a test row with an ID of 0 into an auto_incremented column.
It ignores it, and gives it an ID of 1 instead.
So, not a CakePHP bug at all.
Steve
On Apr 14, 9:37 pm, Defranco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nobody?
>
> /
I can't answer all your points, but in theory, you could probably
achieve what you're aiming for in (2) by making SearchEngine a factory
class which instantiates the other classes on demand. But you'd
probably do better with a different architecture.
My suggestion would be to use a call such as $
The CSS is there because of a ticket I posted - in XHTML it's invalid
to have any input elements within a form element that aren't also
enclosed by a block-level element (so, a fieldset, a paragraph, a
div). The inline CSS is purely there to allow you to have valid XHTML
and not break your layout
I second the recommendation of Wampserver.
Only problem I've found is that it doesn't include a mail server by
default - which means, if you're running under Vista, you can't send
emails from your localhost.
Steve
On Apr 3, 7:04 pm, dw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i use wampserver and like it.h
I agree - there's no need for a helper - it seems pointless to add
extra load to PHP processing when you can just add the extra scripting
to your views and layouts directly.
jQuery is concise enough that you don't need to code a helper for
it :)
On Apr 3, 1:08 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PRO
MAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am hosting with StoneRocket.net
>
> On 30 mar, 06:20, Stephen Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which, so long as your RewriteBase directive takes the form of:
>
> > RewriteBase /directory
>
> > Will be exactly right. If th
For the database side all I use is a constructor DATABASE_CONFIG(),
which checks whether or not the site is running on localhost. If it
is, I use the settings I've previously defined in the file (following
the same convention as the default setup).
I'm working on expanding my overall concept at t
Probably.
Suggestion - ask your HOST what the correct settings should be.
On Apr 1, 11:23 pm, Raistlin Majere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I replaced the line:
>
> 'host' => 'localhost',
>
> with:
>
> 'host' => 'www.toreadandtowrite.com',
>
> Is it wrong?
>
> On 31 mar, 01:59, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you could share that code, I'll happily look at creating a patch to
> tart it up a bit.
>
> simonhttp://www.simonellistonball.com/
>
> On Apr 1, 3:09 pm, Stephen Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd love to see
I'd love to see this sort of functionality in there - I've just built
a component to handle that side of things, it's not perfect but it
does work.
On Apr 1, 12:13 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See! That's the beauty of cake. It can look awfully restrictive with
> all this
Trouble is, as he says in the original post, this is for an external
application.
So he can't use Cake methods. That doesn't mean there's not an easier
way to do it, however I can't think of one :)
On Mar 31, 6:06 am, jonknee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for your repleys. I got it work
Which, so long as your RewriteBase directive takes the form of:
RewriteBase /directory
Will be exactly right. If this isn't working for you, I suggest
contacting your hosting company for further support. Cake has worked
successfully for me every time, deploying onto many different servers
and ho
I'm sure I won't be the first person to have seen this... or the last
to respond to it:
http://www.akbkhome.com/blog.php/View/161/CakePHP_taking_it_apart_and_the_better_written_world_of_sinners.html
Seems like this guy just doesn't like frameworks. Ours in particular.
--~--~-~--~~---
I know this might seem illogical to you - but ALL the information you
need to get Cake working is in the docs. Hell, in most cases all you
have to do is upload the files as downloaded either from the site or
from SVN. This is all I've ever had to do.
Rename app/config/database.default.php to data
Perhaps I came down a little hard on them. I had a bad experience with
their support the other day, which has resulted in me moving a client
site to Webfusion instead. Stupidity really.
On Mar 27, 2:31 pm, SumanRS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had the same experience as Miki. You need to be g
Avoid 1and1 for Cake like the plague. It's a bloody nightmare. I had
to change the .htaccess files, the databases were slow as hell... and
their helpdesk support is pathetic. We're migrating all our sites away
from them now.
Steve
On Mar 26, 5:59 pm, Rob Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any
Is Zend Framework a big enough open-source project for you? They
follow this convention.
Steve
On Mar 8, 8:31 pm, Guy Rutenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi rtconner,
>
> On Mar 8, 1:52 am, rtconner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FYI, It might be a good practive not to use the '?>' to close
Well, it could also be that EasyPHP just isn't very good.
So far, my recommended WAMP setups are either XAMPP or Wampserver.
I've had problems with several others, including Bitnami WampStack and
EasyPHP.
Steve
On Mar 5, 9:15 pm, "Juan Luis Baptiste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5,
39 matches
Mail list logo
