Re: 1.2 Documentation has made amazing progress

2008-05-09 Thread jonathan.snook
On May 9, 3:06 pm, Ma'moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The online manual is great and a very big thank you for everyone who put an effort on it! but i have a small note if i am allowed to say so, the font of the content is relatively small and i think making it a lil bit bigger would feel much

Re: Email Component 1.2 -- Problems with HTML and SMTP

2008-04-24 Thread jonathan.snook
On Apr 22, 9:56 pm, Schuchert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could this be the reason that my html messages only come in as text? To be honest, I'm not sure. I'd probably have to pick apart the code to understand for sure. Try the MIME-Version header and see what happens. I'm leaning towards an issue

Re: Email Component 1.2 -- Problems with HTML and SMTP

2008-04-21 Thread jonathan.snook
Grab the latest version from the nightlies, if you can, as many issues have been resolved with the exception of the newline problem which I've already submitted a bug for and have talked to Felix about it. I use SMTP and use HTML templates. $this-Email-to = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';

Re: #sql_968_0

2007-05-19 Thread jonathan.snook
On May 19, 8:13 am, cake_cooker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My query joins columns from mainly 2 tables and adds some more tables 'booked' , 'available', etc... computing the previous columns. So in my View i get the results like grouped according on the table the come from (ex 'products',

Re: Ever heard of tags.ini.php ?

2007-05-12 Thread jonathan.snook
the tags.ini.php file was a 1.1 thing that you had to copy over from the /cake/ folder. For 1.2, check out: http://www.thinkingphp.org/2007/02/21/use-html-401-in-cakephp-12/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Database Views

2007-04-10 Thread jonathan.snook
On Apr 9, 4:14 pm, sumanpaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well it should work. if there seems to be problem try baking the model. It should show the view. If not then there might be some problem with view itself. it works for me. may be cake guys need more info to figure out why u r having

Re: Adding/Calling a new class in my application... how please ?

2007-04-10 Thread jonathan.snook
you should never have to touch anything in the cake folder. To include a custom class, you'll need to drop it into the vendors folder -- either the one in the root or the one in the app folder if you only want to use it for this project. From there, you can include it in an action with

Re: Scary associations with recursive calls

2007-04-09 Thread jonathan.snook
On Apr 9, 12:01 am, Mariano Iglesias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This sounds like a scream for help, and expects() is up to the challenge ;) http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/185 I've used expects() and in my opinion, should become a core feature of CakePHP. It feels a lot more natural

Re: WithCake.com ideas (Was Re: WithCake.com relaunched)

2007-04-06 Thread jonathan.snook
Kind of developer and company rankings would be cool. Especially cake is lacking some good documentations; so probably add some field stating how many articles were published by that developer (this is also good to Cake itself) or so... something like: That's not a bad idea. The biggest

Re: WithCake.com relaunched

2007-04-05 Thread jonathan.snook
On Mar 24, 4:52 pm, jonathan.snook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's still two main features that I need to add: 1) RSS feeds for the job listing 2) a way for people to contact you through the site Both of these are now in. At this point, the site is essentially feature complete although

Re: Link / URL Best Practices

2007-03-30 Thread jonathan.snook
That said, I've never had it not work because the default php.ini setting is on. But if you don't have control over your server, or the code is for wide distribution, it's not the best idea. I hear this argument repeatedly, about using the short form, but why would it not be enabled? What

WithCake.com relaunched

2007-03-24 Thread jonathan.snook
So, awhile back I launched WithCake.com as a blog about the stuff I ran into doing CakePHP development. I decided to scrap that idea and move the content back into my site, Snook.ca. I ended up with a domain that needed something... After seeing a job wiki for CodeIgniter, I thought it might be

Re: model::query different output with different version of php - a bug or?

2007-03-20 Thread jonathan.snook
Yes, it's an unfortunate side effect of using custom queries, especially when joins or nested queries are involved. For a project, I modified the core to use 0 as the alias if the table name returned didn't match a list of model names. In the database.php file, I declared a list of all available

Re: CakePHP versus Symfony ?

2007-03-03 Thread jonathan.snook
On Mar 3, 4:52 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Symfony currently has a better datalayer t2hen cake . It uses propel, a ORM solution. with cake we still work with (unconvenient) data- arrays iirc the cake 2.0 release will contain an object-based datalayer (written by the cake

custom queries and mysql_fetch_field

2006-11-18 Thread jonathan.snook
So, I've been trying to track down a solution to this problem and I haven't found it yet. (I should probably open a trac ticket but figured I'd shoot out the question here first). Okay, I have a custom query doing some fun stuff, but anytime I'm using mysql functions (like COUNT or SUBSTRING or

Re: custom queries and mysql_fetch_field

2006-11-18 Thread jonathan.snook
On Nov 18, 5:51 pm, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had this happen once. I believe it has something to do with how your database encoding is set up. Upon further inspection, I believe it occurs when MySQL has to create a temporary table during the SELECT process. This is more likely to occur