On May 8, 11:03 am, "Sliv (Tim MacAleese)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An example further to Chris' point is a recent discussion I had with
> Nate - I ran into an issue where I passed an IP address through built-
> in IP validation then used ip2long to convert it so I could store it
> in a MySQL
An example further to Chris' point is a recent discussion I had with
Nate - I ran into an issue where I passed an IP address through built-
in IP validation then used ip2long to convert it so I could store it
in a MySQL signed INT. I noticed that an IP written like
255.255.255.011 would pass vali
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:01 AM, b logica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if you got that backward, but I'd think it'd always be
> easier if you know the other person has a better idea than yourself.
>
*Knowing* and *accepting* are two different things. Computer
programmers tend to b
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have a winner!
>
> For many people it is a difficult thing to swallow your pride, tell
> your ego to shut the fuck up and help build out someone else's vision
> even when you know deep down inside that their visio
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Sliv (Tim MacAleese)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I still don't understand, is all the people that make these huge
> plans that involve massive amounts of work, yet I don't see these
> people doing arguably way less work to write test cases and patches
>
What I still don't understand, is all the people that make these huge
plans that involve massive amounts of work, yet I don't see these
people doing arguably way less work to write test cases and patches
for bugs/enhancements. Is it because these people only want to
develop if they're in total co
Keymaster, you make some very good points. Picking and choosing the
right extension for the job follows the philosophy of Cake to begin
with: Have a lean, mean core and extend as needed.
Being careful of what is added is just being smart.
Having the Bakery as a one-stop shopping place for such a
I can't imagine myself using a huge "bundled" set of extra stuff,
unless it was part of a cakephp initiative that was officially, and
reliably, supported into the future with successive cake releases.
Anything less, I would probably regard as too fly-by-nght to base my
systems on.
The extra stuff
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Dardo Sordi Bogado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Like I always say: You are always one of two people in this world:
> > Someone who is part of the problem, or someone who is part of the
> > solution. Decide who you are.
>
> There are 10 kind of people in the
> Like I always say: You are always one of two people in this world:
> Someone who is part of the problem, or someone who is part of the
> solution. Decide who you are.
There are 10 kind of people in the world: those who can read binary
and those who can't.
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~--
Like I always say: You are always one of two people in this world:
Someone who is part of the problem, or someone who is part of the
solution. Decide who you are.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cak
> Communism failed! and open source is definitely as much about the
> *individual* as the community.
Well indeed, unlike democracy which is so successful and righteous!
As far as I'm concerned, you can take the Cake release, pack it up
with a bunch of behaviors, components, etc, and make a b
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Mariano Iglesias
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just because. Or what, am I supposed to conf you in everytime I make a call
> to gwoo?
You know i can't be there for you Mariano every time you need a hug ;)
> Who says that everything that Larry, Nate, Garret, and
CTED] En nombre
de Marcin Domanski
Enviado el: Martes, 06 de Mayo de 2008 01:54 p.m.
Para: cake-php@googlegroups.com
Asunto: Re: Something on the top of CakePHP
> We do less talking about what is going on in CakePHP in the dev
> channel than you would imagine. All the talking really h
> Because we're friends who happen to have the common goal of
> contributing to the development of CakePHP. If you want to actively
> work on something related to the project, you can join, too.
Ok nate now im worried.. whats up with those polite responses ?;)
--
Marcin Domanski
http://kab
On May 6, 12:54 pm, "Marcin Domanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Gwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > It is not related to CakePHP support which is the mission of the group.
>
> > We do less talking about what is going on in CakePHP in the dev
> > channe
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Gwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > For me censorship is not the solution. Good thing its a mailing list
> > and people don't have to look at it on the GGroup interface.
>
> I do not believe in censorship either, which is why i left the thread
> open. I w
On May 6, 8:57 am, "Dr. Tarique Sani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someday we will meet and talk about semantics and winning debater's points
> :)
CakeFest Argentina, Dec 2-5.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Gwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I point you to a definition..."Communism is a socioeconomic
> structure that promotes the establishment of a classless, stateless
> society based on common ownership of the means of production.[1]".
> Now, if you had said "Altruism
>
> For me censorship is not the solution. Good thing its a mailing list
> and people don't have to look at it on the GGroup interface.
I do not believe in censorship either, which is why i left the thread
open. I was looking for some reaction and if people consider it
helpful then I will leave i
>
> FWIW - I differ here - a prime motivator for writing open source is
> "scratching your own itch"
I have no problem with scratching your own itch if it also has
application to the greater community. For instance, I have been
working on an Actionscript project that I wanted to get up on Ohloh.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Gwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me, it is time to remove this thread.
For me censorship is not the solution. Good thing its a mailing list
and people don't have to look at it on the GGroup interface.
> It is not related to CakePHP support which is the missio
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Gwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those of you who want to be part of CakePHP, please feel free to
> contact me. As Sliv stated, we are always looking for people who are
> willing to write tests, patches, docs, etc. We are not looking for
> people who want to c
Sliv, thank you for being a voice of reason and contributing to
CakePHP in a great way. I am sure Felix would have the same message,
if he were paying attention.
For me, it is time to remove this thread. It is not related to CakePHP
support which is the mission of the group. Also, please do not r
24 matches
Mail list logo
