I find you insistence that in no normal circumstances could massl have
a point (which is how I understand your replies to this thread) - a
bit weird.
Firstly, I certainly did not intend to say massl could not have a
point under any circumstance. So apologies if I came across as
dismissive in
On May 7, 3:46 pm, WebbedIT p...@webbedit.co.uk wrote:
I guess you've never heard of black hat seo techniques.
Yip, certainly have
Report them for what - most of the time we're talking about typos
A typo wouldn't lead to this issue, a typo would lead to your domain
or main parameters
@AD7six: I'm not sure why that was necessary as I implied in my reply
that the only way Google would find incorrect links to index was if
someone maliciously posted erroneous links, but that would have to be
a very rare situation to be in and you could easily find out which
site they had come from
On May 7, 10:32 am, WebbedIT p...@webbedit.co.uk wrote:
@AD7six: I'm not sure why that was necessary as I implied in my reply
that the only way Google would find incorrect links to index was if
someone maliciously posted erroneous links, but that would have to be
a very rare situation to be
I guess you've never heard of black hat seo techniques.
Yip, certainly have
Report them for what - most of the time we're talking about typos
A typo wouldn't lead to this issue, a typo would lead to your domain
or main parameters being wrong which would result in CakePHP kicking
out some sort
I also don't want to discuss about whether it's an issue or not
@massl: Only just caught the above line in your 2nd post, so sorry to
take the topic in that direction, but I think it is a useful thread
for others to read as any site could fall foul of such malicious
attacks, although in my
I do no see how this is a problem as neither you or a search engine
would add extra unneeded parameters to a link, and if the hard coded
links do not exist in your pages then Google cannot index them
Also anyone linking to your pages is just going to copy/paste an URL,
they're not going to add in
On May 6, 8:47 am, WebbedIT p...@webbedit.co.uk wrote:
I do no see how this is a problem as neither you or a search engine
would add extra unneeded parameters to a link, and if the hard coded
links do not exist in your pages then Google cannot index them
Also anyone linking to your pages is
On May 5, 2:19 pm, massl vermas...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 Mai, 14:01, John Andersen j.andersen...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wonder, when the search engine goes through your site, then
your site does not make the duplicate URLs (I assume), so the issue
should not arise!
If I am wrong,
Hi,
I currently have a SEO problem with CakePHP.
For example you have an users-controller with an action register
that is called by example.com/users/register. You can now add more
arguments to the URL e.g. example.com/users/register/my/duplicate/
content.
That's very bad for SEO because you
I just wonder, when the search engine goes through your site, then
your site does not make the duplicate URLs (I assume), so the issue
should not arise!
If I am wrong, please clarify :)
Enjoy,
John
On May 5, 2:33 pm, massl vermas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I currently have a SEO problem with
On 5 Mai, 14:01, John Andersen j.andersen...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wonder, when the search engine goes through your site, then
your site does not make the duplicate URLs (I assume), so the issue
should not arise!
If I am wrong, please clarify :)
Yes sure, it's not a ultimative huge
What about insert a canonical meta tag inside pages that are prone to
have duplicated urls?
The canonical meta tells the search engine that the right url for a
page is that url you put as canonical
This way, even if each duplicated page has the same url, you will not
have indexing problems
But how are they duplicates?
/users/profile/1/
/users/profile/2/
/blog/read/some-slug/123/
/blog/read/slug/12356/
/image/view/15
None of those are duplicates.
Why would you pass arguments that ultimately don't decide how the
action renders?
On May 5, 8:17 am, Lucca Mordente
14 matches
Mail list logo
