Murray wrote:
>
>
> OK on the non-glare framing glass not making useful ground glass - I think
> it's useless for framing too :O)
So my local framer tells me !
>
> Or a battery-operated fan in-line in a hose...h, I'll have to
> try that.
>
You should be able to get a small battery oprated
I have inserted some comments below at the ""
Bob
At 14:31 17.08.02 -0400, you wrote:
>OK on the non-glare framing glass not making useful ground glass - I think
>it's useless for framing too :O)
>
>I understand the concept of the spacing of the emulsion relative to the film
>h
OK on the non-glare framing glass not making useful ground glass - I think
it's useless for framing too :O)
I understand the concept of the spacing of the emulsion relative to the film
holder 'pressure plate', but if someone know's a spec or tolerance, that
would be nice.
I could always start wi
Murry,
Try metering through one with a spot meter to compare exposure values,
this is what I did for mine. Remember to meter through the center
metalized portion for accuracy. I use a 6in and a 12in on my 8X10 field
camera.
Take a look at my pageyou may find it of some interest.
http://w
My interest is in 'elephant cameras' :O)
...using large aerial military surplus lenses.
Anyone here have an idea what similarity there would be between the aerial
filters and 'modern' Wratten filters, for purposes of estimating 'filter
factor' for exposure correction?
Also, on the Metrogon typ
