I think this is a case of using a fancy new construction when a
simpler construction would do just as well.
For some reasons some people, even beginners, are absolutely fond of
first-class modules, and insist on using them in situation where
they're really not needed. I not eager to see what they w
**
Second CALL FOR PAPER
Sixth Workshop on Intersection Types and Related Systems (ITRS 2012)
June 29th, Dubrovnik (Croatia).
http://itrs2012.di.unito.it/
Workshop held in conju
> Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 22:27, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
>
>> It does it the right way ;-)
>
>
> The "I'm going to vomit files across your whole file system so that you
> need another bureaucratic tool/database too keep track of what I did
> whenever you want to remove me" way. Sure if you're
On 8 Mar 2012, at 22:26, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>
> 2012/3/8 Adrien :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08/03/2012, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2012/3/8 Daniel Bünzli :
Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 ŕ 09:31, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
> setup.ml will be enough for me ;-) But I am biased.
Fo
> A Makefile works just fine (and making the autogenerated code less complex
> rather than more would be better).
>
> This is the template Makefile I use:
> https://github.com/avsm/ocaml-github/blob/master/Makefile
>
Plus you can generate this file from _oasis, via. DevFiles plugin e.g.
Plugins:
Taking one step back, what you actually want is a data structure that:
-is a container for elements of some type 'a
-some elements are tagged with a "state" tag 'b
-the elements have an ordering
-you can add elements
-you can tag elements with a "state" tag
-you can remove the current element
-you
OCAML USERS AND DEVELOPERS WORKSHOP 2012
OUD 2012
http://oud.ocaml.org
CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS
Copenhagen, Denmark
Fri, Sep 14th
Co-located wi
Le vendredi, 9 mars 2012 à 12:56, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
> You can call it KISS, but I would call it short-sighted. This has nothing
> to do with bureaucracy. Imagine a package has also some utilities to
> install (and feeled every second package has). You just don't want to have
> to include ton
Hi,
On 03/08/2012 03:12 PM, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2012, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastien Ferre:
Hi,
I am considering developping an OCaml
application using Lablgtk2 for the GUI,
and using ocaml-java/Nickel for calling
a Java library (namely, OWL-API). I am
working on Linu
Le mercredi, 7 mars 2012 à 16:58, Edgar Friendly a écrit :
> > IMHO a package should be identified by a name and version.
>
> I've been thinking about this for a long time, and the full consequences
> of this involve not only deep changes to odb internals, but also expose
> the code to a t
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Gabriel Scherer
wrote:
> I think this is a case of using a fancy new construction when a
> simpler construction would do just as well.
> For some reasons some people, even beginners, are absolutely fond of
> first-class modules, and insist on using them in situation
It still works for java 1.6 (windows)
Sincerely
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Ferre [mailto:sebastien.fe...@irisa.fr]
Sent: Friday,March 09,2012 3:09 PM
To: caml-list
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-java + lablgtk2
Hi,
On 03/08/2012 03:12 PM, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag,
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Sebastien Ferre wrote:
> This looks promising, and adequate to my needs.
> However, the last version dates back to 2004, and
> is for java-1.4. Is there any chance it stills
> works ? Has anybody used it recently ?
The version on SVN has more recent change
On 03/09/2012 09:26 AM, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Without going into the dependency resolving thing, I still think it's
an issue. Basically with odb you don't really know what you are
downloading.
http://oasis.ocamlcore.org/dev/odb/
This page shows the stable, testing and unstable versions of each
Le vendredi, 9 mars 2012 à 17:26, Edgar Friendly a écrit :
> http://oasis.ocamlcore.org/dev/odb/
Ah missed that. Maybe you should mention the link in the README.md (searching
for "odb ocaml" on the web brings me directly to github).
> While I agree it'd be nice to just parse oasis files,
*To be removed from our mailing list, please respond to this message with
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject*
*
2012 INTERNATIONAL SPRING SCHOOL IN NATURAL COMPUTING
SSNC 2012
Tarragona, Spain
May 28 June 1st, 2012
Dear camlers,
I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
(notably because writing interfaces boils down to writing types) and
efficient this approach is. Would a similar thing work for the JVM, that is
a compiler from ocaml bytecode to java bytecode? I guess it wouldn't
p
Le 09/03/2012 18:12, Philippe Veber a écrit :
Dear camlers,
I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
(notably because writing interfaces boils down to writing types) and
efficient this approach is. Would a similar thing work for the JVM, that
is a compiler from ocaml
Le 8 mars 2012 à 15:12, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2012, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastien Ferre:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am considering developping an OCaml
>> application using Lablgtk2 for the GUI,
>> and using ocaml-java/Nickel for calling
>> a Java library (namely, OWL-API). I a
Le 9 mars 2012 à 18:45, Johan Grande a écrit :
> Le 09/03/2012 18:12, Philippe Veber a écrit :
>> Dear camlers,
>> I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
>> (notably because writing interfaces boils down to writing types) and
>> efficient this approach is. Would a s
Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 22:27, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
> Let say that if you just use $htmldir, it will help whatever packaging
> system that cooperate with oasis to enforce it in the future.
In fact it is possible to not say anything at all, just don't mention
InstallDir, oasis doesn't co
Hi,
2012/3/9 Daniel Bünzli :
>
>
> Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 22:27, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
>
>> Let say that if you just use $htmldir, it will help whatever packaging
>> system that cooperate with oasis to enforce it in the future.
>
> In fact it is possible to not say anything at all, just don't
Le vendredi, 9 mars 2012 à 20:11, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
> >
> > Document "reference"
> > Title: "Xmlm's documentation and module reference"
> > Format: html
> > Index: Xmlm.html
> > Install: true
> > DataFiles: doc/*.html, doc/*.css
> >
> > Document "distribution"
> > Title: "Xmlm's dist
> E.g setting "Type:
> ocamlbuild" + a couple of field to tell that your doc will be
> extracted from some libraries/module and build using ocamldoc +
> ocamlbuild:
>
> Document "api-ounit"
> Title: API reference for OUnit
> Type: ocamlbuild (0.2)
> BuildTools+: ocamldoc
> XOCamlbuildLibraries: oU
Hi,
2012/3/9 Daniel Bünzli :
>> E.g setting "Type:
>> ocamlbuild" + a couple of field to tell that your doc will be
>> extracted from some libraries/module and build using ocamldoc +
>> ocamlbuild:
>>
>> Document "api-ounit"
>> Title: API reference for OUnit
>> Type: ocamlbuild (0.2)
>> BuildTools
On 03/09/2012 05:06 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Sebastien Ferre wrote:
This looks promising, and adequate to my needs.
However, the last version dates back to 2004, and
is for java-1.4. Is there any chance it stills
works ? Has anybody used it recent
[My sincere apologies for multiple or unsolicited posting]
**
SAS2012
Second Call for Papers
and
> > > DEADLI
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:34:12AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 06:10:15PM -0700, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> > On 02/06/2012 06:05 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> > > So going through various things looks like Ocaml is vulnerable and has
> > > not had a CVE # assigned for this
28 matches
Mail list logo
