Woah.
Okay! I'm convinced! Lets make Rails 4.0!
—
Jenna
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 11:45 PM, Matthias Wächter wrote:
> Am 13.04.2012 17:40, schrieb Jenna Fox:
> > An A4 piece of paper has a little over 9kb of data storage if storing in
> > binary at 300dpi
> >
>
>
> A4 is about 2
Am 13.04.2012 17:40, schrieb Jenna Fox:
An A4 piece of paper has a little over 9kb of data storage if storing in
binary at 300dpi
A4 is about 21*30 cm², i.e. 630 cm² or 97.65 sqin. 300 dpi means 90,000
dpsqin or about 8.788 MdpA4. Without accounting for encoding,
redundancy, synchronization e
rack has a minimal file-server [0]
0.
https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/6496241b25daa20fd9dd736119dc39bdac54869d/lib/rack/file.rb#L70
ive been usin it on my phone to do the basics, it kind of chokes on 128M
podcasts as a mediaplayer
http://repo.or.cz/w/element.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/doc/find.ht
LOL! Good to know, if I ever need to do those things :-)
An A4 piece of paper has a little over 9kb of data storage if
storing in binary at 300dpi
On the other hand, Camping is already far too big to fit entirely in
a QR code. It would take as many as TWO QR codes to store camping in
it
On static files:
Sure, there are ways to have a server do your static files for you, but those
ways are inconsistent and require strong knowledge of servers - further, they
limit Camping's ability to do smart things with cache control. As a framework
which tries to be friendly to beginners, depl
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:54, Jenna Fox wrote:
> bin/camping is great but it's not usually a good way to deploy an app on a
> server - it tends to be more for development.
Yes, and when you're deploying there are better ways to serve static files.
> Putting functionality in to
> bin/camping whi
Yeah of course!
Cheers!
Isak Andersson
Dave Everitt skrev:
For me, this also depends on what Magnus - as the main Camper ninja - thinks -
DaveE
I agree, I'd like to see the way Camping works to grow in to something much
more usable. Perhaps a fork is a good idea because the legacy would re
For me, this also depends on what Magnus - as the main Camper ninja -
thinks - DaveE
I agree, I'd like to see the way Camping works to grow in to
something much more usable. Perhaps a fork is a good idea because
the legacy would remain and all. But then in the fork we could deal
with thin
On the other hand, Camping is already far too big to fit entirely in a QR code.
It would take as many as TWO QR codes to store camping in it's entirety.
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 1:40 AM, Jenna Fox wrote:
> An A4 piece of paper has a little over 9kb of data storage if storing in
I agree, I'd like to see the way Camping works to grow in to something much
more usable. Perhaps a fork is a good idea because the legacy would remain and
all. But then in the fork we could deal with things that might be kind of
annoying at times. And grow it with a steady pace.
If we'd fork ca
An A4 piece of paper has a little over 9kb of data storage if storing in binary
at 300dpi
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 1:09 AM, Dave Everitt wrote:
> There's a crucial point here... if 3k (the old 4k) is a 'proof of concept'
> and a great exercise in programming skill, it isn't som
There's a crucial point here... if 3k (the old 4k) is a 'proof of
concept' and a great exercise in programming skill, it isn't something
that most users will really worry about. If the 3k limit has to be
broken back up to 4 or even 5k to get some added/altered/optional
functionality that wo
Do you mean this kind of issue:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3755898/campings-url-doesnt-give-me-site-root-as-expected
?
DaveE
One more thought - on file serving, I think it'd be nice if the
default was that local files are served out of /files/ url rather
than just being at the app's
bin/camping is great but it's not usually a good way to deploy an app on a
server - it tends to be more for development. Putting functionality in to
bin/camping which belongs in camping core is like wearing a backpack filled
with hydrogen while having your weight checked. 3kb is great and all, b
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 15:59, Jenna Fox wrote:
> The problem is basically this:
>
> Sometimes you want to reference static files, and other components of your
> site. I have a Gallery app mounted at http://creativepony.com/gallery/ and
> it causes me all sorts of trouble. Often times to reference
#x27;s
no clear solution!
—
Jenna
On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 11:35 PM, Dave Everitt wrote:
> In another post, Jenna said: "I have some trouble with Camping's URL
> mapping system - so much so I'm considering sinatra for my next ruby
> web project"
>
> I j
In another post, Jenna said: "I have some trouble with Camping's URL
mapping system - so much so I'm considering sinatra for my next ruby
web project"
I just wanted to know what the trouble was, and if/how it might/could/
can't be addressed, so star
17 matches
Mail list logo
