[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-09 Thread Julie
hj --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-09 Thread Julie
Yes, after setting up everything I have finally tested my deploy.rb with local_perforce.rb and it works! Thank you so much, you are a life saver. I think other people who are having similar problems can use this patch easily. Julie --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To unsub

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-09 Thread Richard McMahon
Hi Julie, Did this local_perforce fix give you what you were after? Cheers Richie On 1/8/07, Julie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Wolfmans, > thank you very much for the solution, I will go ahead and use/test it > and let you know how it goes. > > I am not sure if this is what you've meant,

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-08 Thread Julie
Hi Wolfmans, thank you very much for the solution, I will go ahead and use/test it and let you know how it goes. I am not sure if this is what you've meant, but my plan is to have one development server that has access to perforce, have this server update itself from the repository, then have th

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-06 Thread wolfmanjm
Ok I have uploaded a file called local_perforce.rb to this group.. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/capistrano/web/local_perforce.rb this has the same hack applied to it as my new_subversion.rb for checking out locally then copying the result to the servers. If you set the config variable rep

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-05 Thread wolfmanjm
I can help with the latter solution, I have some perforce experience, although i don't currently use it, so someone else would need to test it. I'll take a look at the perforce scm and see what it would take to make my svn solution work. Julie i'm presuming that you now want to deploy from a lo

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-05 Thread Jamis Buck
On Jan 5, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Julie wrote: Question for Jamis, when I was searching through different topics I have read you earlier comment about modifying capistrano to decouple deployment from scm part. Are you planning to make it generic so that it would also work with perforce as well as su

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-05 Thread Julie
Question for Jamis, when I was searching through different topics I have read you earlier comment about modifying capistrano to decouple deployment from scm part. Are you planning to make it generic so that it would also work with perforce as well as subversion? (with remote servers having no acc

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-04 Thread wolfmanjm
julie - sorry it won't work as-is with perforce, it is specifically for subversion, my point was that the framework for perforce would be similar, however someone would need to rewrite it for perforce. On Jan 4, 4:45 pm, "Julie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Wolf, thanks for the feedback. I lo

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-04 Thread Julie
Hi Wolf, thanks for the feedback. I looked over your tar file. it's got 2 files: new_subversion.rb and new_subversion_test.rb I will copy them over my lib/tasks directory but they seem like very "subversion oriented". Are you sure it would work for perforce? I am also using the patch from Ric

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-04 Thread wolfmanjm
jason, one of the facilities I added to my new subversion scm module is the ability to allow different URLs for access from the local and remote machines, which I think addresses your concerns. whether it is less ugly than the hosts option is debatable. julie- the same technique I use in this sc

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-04 Thread Jason Norris
Julie, AFAIK, all servers AND the box you run the deploy commands from(my development box in my case) must be able to access the source server. In my case, the subversion server is on my local network but my web servers are not. Therefore, for the svn server to be accessible at the same addr

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-04 Thread Jamis Buck
The way capistrano works, currently, is that in order to use the default "deploy" recipe, all servers must have access to the repository, regardless of the SCM in use. Others have posted workarounds to this restriction, but (iirc) they are all specific to subversion. I'm working on some c

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-04 Thread Julie
Thanks for the reply. I have asked Richard about this before and he indicated that very likely all the servers must have access to p4 for this to work. He said he was pretty sure but still recommended me to check with other capistrano gurus out there, thus I posted the same question here. My se

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-03 Thread Jamis Buck
On Jan 3, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Julie wrote: Hi Jamis, I am new to Ruby and Capistrano and this is my first experience at this site. Where can I access the Capistrano 1.3.0 code? Capistrano shares Rails' repository. You can check it out (using subversion) with: svn co http://dev.rubyon

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-03 Thread Jamis Buck
I'm afraid I have no experience with perforce, and so am not able to address your questions. Capistrano does ship with a perforce module, but it was contributed by a third party. Richard, I believe you're on this list: would you mind chiming in on this regarding perforce? - Jamis On Ja

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-03 Thread Julie
Hi Jamis, On my earlier post I was asking about how to access Capistrano 1.3.0, does it also have the feature "diff_from_last_deploy"? As I mentioned before I am a new bee in Capistrano and Ruby and I am really stuck with these problems, I hope you can provide some help. I am having difficulty

[Capistrano] Re: Capistrano 1.3.0

2007-01-03 Thread Julie
Hi Jamis, I am new to Ruby and Capistrano and this is my first experience at this site. Where can I access the Capistrano 1.3.0 code? thanks Julie Jamis Buck wrote: Here it is, Capistrano 1.3.0. Mostly it is just bug fixes, but it includes a few minor new features. The new features: * The