On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
9) TLS: this is needed by CSG. For MB its obviously important, but if we
can't fix it by 1.0 then we will go ahead anyway and fix in a 1.01 or
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
9) TLS: this is needed by CSG. For MB its obviously important, but
+1!
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
9) TLS: this is needed by CSG. For MB its obviously important, but if we
can't fix it by 1.0 then we will go ahead anyway and fix in a 1.01 or 1.1
shortly after. Action: Rajika to look at it.
I fixed some UI issues
9) TLS: this is needed by CSG. For MB its obviously important, but if we
can't fix it by 1.0 then we will go ahead anyway and fix in a 1.01 or 1.1
shortly after. Action: Rajika to look at it.
I fixed some UI issues in CSG in last couple of days.I'll look into this
now.
Rajika
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
1. Discussed the need to support three scenarios:
a) MB co-located inside ESB using p2 to install the component. There seems
to be an issue with
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
1. Discussed the need to support three scenarios:
a) MB co-located inside ESB using p2 to install the component. There seems
to be an issue with the client libs getting in the right place. Danushka is
following up with
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
1. Discussed the need to support three scenarios:
a) MB co-located inside ESB using p2 to install the component. There seems
to be an issue with the client libs getting in the right place. Danushka is
following up with
I've just built the ESB too and I'll have a look.
Right now I've got the ESB 3.0.1 and MB working separately and that looks
fine. I'm seeing MB stabilize at about 700Mb of memory. I'm not getting very
exciting throughput. I've got curl sending requests to the ESB which is
dumping messages into
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
I've just built the ESB too and I'll have a look.
Right now I've got the ESB 3.0.1 and MB working separately and that looks
fine. I'm seeing MB stabilize at about 700Mb of memory. I'm not getting very
exciting throughput.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
I've just built the ESB too and I'll have a look.
Right now I've got the ESB 3.0.1 and MB working separately and that looks
fine. I'm seeing MB
Amila, there is no Reg access for auth/authz.
Danushka
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
I've just built
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
I've just built the ESB too and I'll have a look.
Right now I've got
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
1. Discussed the need to support three scenarios:
a) MB co-located inside ESB using p2 to install the component. There seems
to be an issue with the client libs getting in the right place. Danushka is
following up with
yesterday I have a chat with Senaka, and as he told carbon internally uses
its own jndi context to support multi tenancy.
will have a look more into this and send an update.
thanks,
Amila.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
1. Discussed the need to support
17 matches
Mail list logo
