Hi all. We are going to attempt to update the standard romfs file system
to support some additional stuff, like ssh and ???. Can someone give me a
hint where to start?
Or is there a better way?
John
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote:
> Hi all. We are going to attempt to update the standard romfs file system
> to support some additional stuff, like ssh and ???. Can someone give me a
> hint where to start?
Well, the current romfs is mainly busybox (unmodified) and the katcp
too
Does anybody have tested the sync line (pps) on the iadc of the new toolflow?
Cheers,
Andrea
2013/3/27 Andrea Mattana :
> Hi all,
>
> I have tested the PPS over the sync0-1-2-3 output port of the iADC on
> the new libraries with a very simple design and it seems that the
> simulated PPS in input
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote:
>> Hi all. We are going to attempt to update the standard romfs file
>> system
>> to support some additional stuff, like ssh and ???. Can someone give me
>> a
>> hint where to start?
>
> Well, the current romfs is mainly busybox (unmodified) and
Hi, Andrea,
Are you seeing problems in simulation or on actual hardware? I just made a
quick test model and the sync input was propagated fine in simulation. Can you
please explain your symptoms in more detail? Which version of mlib_devel are
you using? What hardware platform are you target
Hi CASPER team,
I am working with the iBOB FPGA at 250 MHz and two iADCs at 1000 GHz in a
correlator project.
In the compilation I have a timing error
ERROR: 1 constraint not met.
PAR could not meet all timing constrain
Hi, Isaac,
On Apr 3, 2013, at 3:45 PM, isaac...@caltech.edu wrote:
> ERROR: 1 constraint not met.
>
> PAR could not meet all timing constraints. A bitstream will not be generated.
>
> I have read lot of documents and everybody said that is better solve the
> problem adding delays and no disabl
Hi Isaac
An alternative route might be to compile at 200 MHz, and then open the
design with PlanAhead. In Planahead you can then bump it up to 250 MHz,
and try to compile from there, with much more fine-grain control.
As a bonus, you'll also be able to see where it's failing timing. I
believe
Hi All,
I've been playing around in my spare time trying to get Debian squeeze as
the OS for a ROACH board (possibly a bad/pointless idea but hey). The
issue I'm facing is that I need a kernel with UDEV support in and so
launched into cross-compiling one. The problem is finding a BORPH patch
tha
9 matches
Mail list logo