:-)
I have just done that and was about to let you know. I was referencing the
loop0 and not eth0. When changed to eth0 it worked which led me to apply the
h323-g voip interface and h323-g voip bind src configuration.
Thanks guys
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Justin Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED
on hq rtr, make sure you bind h323 to interface for the IP address that you
are using in ccmadmin to identify the interface. otherwise, ccmadmin
doesn't recognize the gateway properly and by default won't connect the
call.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
Since applying the direct-inward-dial i am getting
Result=Success(0); Outgoing Dial-peer=2 Is Matched
Apr 9 03:16:05.126: //-1/1FC1C4848023/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_DEST
Apr 9 03:16:05.126: //-1/1FC1C4848023/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:
Result=SUCCESS(0)
List o
Still get the same results with that command on the dial-peer
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Justin Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On HQ RTR
>
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>
> is missing
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HQ router is h323
BR1 router is mgcp
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In MGCP, the direct-inward-dial is ignored... as the Q931 is being
> backhauled to CCM... and all H.323 commands on the router are
> disregarded.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Ap
In MGCP, the direct-inward-dial is ignored... as the Q931 is being
backhauled to CCM... and all H.323 commands on the router are
disregarded.
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Justin Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On HQ RTR
>
>
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>
> is missing
>
> dire
Its bizzare. When I dial from BR1 to HQ i get connected on the Br1 phone.
I see the following debug on HQ-RTR.
debug isdn q931
debug voice dial-peer all
I can see the digits coming in as 2001 but its not hitting the dial-peer.
Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-qsig
ISDN Serial0/2/0:15 interfac
On HQ RTR
dial-peer voice 1 pots
is missing
direct-inward-dial
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was told in revious email that service mgcp is not required on PRI .
>
> Am i mistaken ?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Charles
I was told in revious email that service mgcp is not required on PRI .
Am i mistaken ?
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the MGCP router add this
>
> dial-peer voice 3000 pots
> port 0/1/0:15
> service mgcpapp
>
> That is the only obvious thing
For MGCP with PRI backhaul to CallManager,
service mgcpapp is not required.
HTH
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the MGCP router add this
>
> dial-peer voice 3000 pots
> port 0/1/0:15
> service mgcpapp
>
> That is the only obvious thing missing
Hi Abdul,
I have done the following:
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip http path flash:
and since it is Dynamips, I have updated all my GUI files in Image folder,
Could Please let me know what I am missing.
Note - In Dynamips B-ACD script will work ?
Thanks,
B
On the MGCP router add this
dial-peer voice 3000 pots
port 0/1/0:15
service mgcpapp
That is the only obvious thing missing...
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI Guys
>
> Got a teaser that bugging me now. I have in my lab HQ and Br1 connec
HI Guys
Got a teaser that bugging me now. I have in my lab HQ and Br1 connected with
E1 crossover to simulate PSTN as best I can. I have Br1 connected to CCM
with MGCP and HQ configured as H323 gateway in CCM. I have respective route
paterns for the remote sites configured to point to the relevent
Except there are a fairly number of CCIE's who are or were Cisco Employees.
Cisco employees get at least three attempts to take the lab at no cost expect
for travel expenses if needed.
David
- Original Message -
From: Devildoc
To: Scott Monasmith ; John
Cc: ccie_voice@onlines
I figured I would chime in on this as I have sat for
my fair share of labs and walked out on far too many
thinking or knowing I had passed only to find out I
hadn't a few hours later. I agree what you see in the
lab isn't always, or actually would almost never be
what you would see in the real wor
I second Scott on his opinion. Just think... on the average, it takes 4
attempts to pass and each attempt cost about $1400. And how many CCIE there
are in the world right now? Roughtly more than 16000. That equates roughly to
more than $89 million dollars.
Just my 1 cent
JD
Date:
What I do is during the CCM Basic Setup, I create in advance the partitions and
CSS that most probably I will need during the rest of the tasks, It worth
remember tham. It is quick and it avoids you to be coming back to create each
in every task. Then you tweak them if neccesary. These is the l
Can you check if
p http serverno ip http secure-serverip http path flash:!
is configured [ of course u are making sure that GUI files are located in the
Flash memory ]
thanks
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:49:42 +0100From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] With Dynamips, CCM
I started with the "by section" approach. It became a problem when I got
several sections into and needed to create Partitions and Calling Search
Spaces.
Start with the Basics and work up:
Switch/vlan configuration
DHCP servers
CM basic partition and CSS
CM phone configuration
Gateway/Gat
There are also other possiblities to make a router dedicated for PSTN with 3
PRIs one connected to HQ router back to back and one connected to Remote site
Router back to back and one connected to BR2 router backto back . This PSTN
router is running CME and have an IP phone [ prefer 7960/or 7970
I have to agree with John; part of being an expert level engineer is
being able to go onsite to a customer's network and decode what they've
done (reading between the lines, not getting the whole truth, etc) and
then put it back together according to their parms. They expect you to
read their mind
Exactly, take care with that because if you are practicing with the Proctorlabs
equipment, they only have PVDM2(NM-HDV2)in their equipmente.
Try to get some PVDM (NM-HDV) by other way and get some practice before the
lab, I thinks PDVM configuration is easier but you have to be prepared for both
I completely agree that it should be more like a two day thing where you get
to interact with the proctor on what you did and why. I talked to several
people who took the R&S lab on both the two day and single day setup and
even though they passed on the single day said they preferred the two day
Correct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:21 AM
To: Christian Narvaez
Cc: CCIE Maillist; Edward French
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3725
So, since they are using 3700s in the lab, we have
I do agree with you that subtle questions shouldn't be the basis, but at the
same time it is a test. If you take any test, it doesn't matter if it's the
CCIE, the CPA or an 8th grade math word problem test, if you don't read the
question for the intent there is a good chance that you won't answer
John,
I respect your response to this post, but I can't help but feel like I am
being tested more on semantics then I am on technically ability. When is a
customer ever going to try and "trip" me up on a configuration? I know most
of the content on the exam pretty well and I have yet to pass this
This is my opinion, but typically anything like you are stating below where
something would grade the "major behavior" you could also replace that
statement with "basic requirements". If you can't get a gateway configured,
if you can't get DHCP configured, if you can't bring CallManager services
u
I don't think us voip guys are really that in trouble... I can make a
kick-ass living on just upgrades...
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:26 AM, anthony giovinazzi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Sad news is that
>
> With the recession will come a massive trimming of IT Staff. No
> qualifi
So, since they are using 3700s in the lab, we have to use the old,
non-PVDM2 way of creating transcoders/CFBs, etc...?
Just to confirm my paranoia...
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Christian Narvaez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> As I know the 3725 in the real lab has PVDM and
As I know the 3725 in the real lab has PVDM and the ISR routers have PVDM2.
So you must be familiar with both ways of configuring Media Resources on
routers.
CONFIGURATION EXAMPLE WITH PVDM
---
voice-card 0
dspfarm
dsp services dspfarm
!
sccp
sccp local vlan210
scc
AAR has no effect in a WAN outage; AAR ONLY works when locations-based
bandwidth has been exceeded.
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:23 AM, ccievoice1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the WAN link is down, then shouldn't affect the AAR call as AAR is
> utilizing the PSTN... and the phones shoul
Never save the config while in SRST mode... it is bad, very very bad.
Also, we always create separate dial-peers with the service mgcpapp
and regular h.323 dial-peers so they do not conflict with one another.
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sco
When I was back with Cisco I asked Fred Baker one of the co-authors of
rfc2597
About this behavior because rfc2597 was so vaguely written.
What I was seeing in the lab with most of the catalyst switches at the time.
Was the opposite behavior, and never got a clear explanation from ASICs
design pe
Like you said.. GK registers to each other via zone remote command.
JD> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:18:44 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech prefix> > Ah..
Ah... that makes a lot more sense now...
Now, I know this isn't on the lab, but how do GKs identify each other
as such? Is it just by the zone remote BORP etc...? Or do they
actually register with each other?
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wel
If the WAN link is down, then shouldn't affect the AAR call as AAR is
utilizing the PSTN... and the phones should able to preserve the call
HTH
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:17 PM, FrogOnDSCP46EF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was just wondering how this tracking business will be done in SRST.
> Ass
I was just wondering how this tracking business will be done in SRST. Assume
AAR connection is up between siteB & HQ and suddenly the serial link goes
down.
Frog
---
I think somehow
Scott,
It happens to me to. If you shut down the serial interface or if you are
already in the SRST mode and you save the config and restart, the PRI will not
come up. If you do a show isdn status, the TEI status is present, and that's
why the PRI is not up. I think somehow the status of t
Thanks, JD.
I'm painfully figuring this out. Do you happen to know why it doesn't work
when the interface is shut down?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> First of all, it is not recommended that you use service mgcp under a pots
> dial-peer with a PR
Greg, you are correct. I mis-read the original question.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Pulos, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The SRND states that allowing a TRUST from a server opens up the
> possibilities that a compromised server now has priority access, among other
> issues, as taken from
Well, zone prefix is for routing calls based on the selected trunk or gateway
to a remote device. The remote device can be either a CME, CCM or another GK.
JD> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:25:48 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper tech
I thought the zone prefix [zone] [prefix] gw-priority [priority] [gk]
Was for connecting to remote gatekeepers?
Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's correct. The zone prefix is highly recommended when you have
> multiple trunks or gateway re
Unless it redirects you to a .PDF file, it will not be accessible in the
lab.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Whats the deal with the IPCC doco on univercd. It redirects you to another
> part of cco. Is this going to be allowed in the exam.
You're welcome.
Test it out and verify the steps. It has been awhile since I have done this.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Awsome Scott. I was going to do some research on this problem but you
> beat me to it. Thanks for the solution.
>
> JD
>
> -
Awsome Scott. I was going to do some research on this problem but you beat me
to it. Thanks for the solution.JD
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:28:33 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
CallManager Annunci
That's correct. The zone prefix is highly recommended when you have multiple
trunks or gateway registered to a GK in the same zone. By default, each trunk
or gateway is assigned a priority of 5. If you have multiple trunks or
gateways for a given zone, then GK will do a round-robin in select
Paul,
First of all, it is not recommended that you use service mgcp under a pots
dial-peer with a PRI connection. If you did, the ports won't get released
properly when falling back to MGCP. You only need to configure service mgcp
under a pots dial-peer for CAS or FXO/FXS connections.
Sec
Thanks for the info. That makes total sense to me.
JD
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:40:21 +0200From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
The thing is, that the testscripts they run (as far as i`ve heard and
experienced) only test some bas
The SRND states that allowing a TRUST from a server opens up the possibilities
that a compromised server now has priority access, among other issues, as taken
from the SRND below:
Servers-Certain servers, within the data center or otherwise, might be capable
of correctly marking their traffic o
Am I right with the following explanation:
Assuming a COS marked packet (dot1q) enters and leaves QoS enabled
3550 switchports.
Steps
1. Incoming dot1q traffic to 3550 ingress port is mapped into
"internal DSCP" using COS-TO-DSCP map
if under the interface:
[ingress port]
mls qo
50 matches
Mail list logo
