Ryan.
I got really disappointed for lack of what i call friendly approach about
this part of QOS so I left it alone for a while and today i came back to
give it another shot and then WOOOW Ryan you are a life saver .
nice explanation pal.
That was exactly where i got lost in QOS and now I am
Hi ,
So, What I'm understanding is u say calls is routed to BR2 in G729 and BR2
changes codec to G711 to send it to IPphones.
some point that I cannot understand if this is the case.
-How can BR2 (gateway) do transcoding? since I didn't set up any transcoding
on that so it should not use
I know I asked this bfore, but still didn't get warm and fuzzy feeling about
this.
The question: We need to preserve 4-digits dialing between HQ and Br1 during
SRST.
On the SRST side it's easy - create POTS dial-peer with destination-pattern
2... with prefix. However it's still not clear how
The call is routed as such:
UCM HQ Phone(VoIP G729)--HQ/GK
(VoIP G729)---PSTN-(NO LONGER VOIP - NOW PCM
THROUGH E1-R2 CAS) ---BR2(VoIP G711)IPPhone.
Bottom line is that once the PSTN has it - it enters BR2 *not* as
Percent in a Policy map is a derivative of Mincir but only IF IF there
is a traffic shaper present on the interface.
If there is no traffic shaper present - then Percent is a derivative
of the bandwidth command.
HTH,
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Senior Technical Instructor
Mark.
it is either me as a dummy or it,s the subject getting way too complicated
. but in either way i appreciate if you can explain it with an example .
Here i got one :
There a link between HQ and BR1 , bandwidth is 512 and we want to reserve
10% for voice and 5% for SIG . I have to achieve
If there were no traffic shaper present in the task requirements (as
you state here) - then yes bandwidth command must be used on the
Serial interface to 512 and the bandwidth command in the policy map
would be set to 51.2 or 51 or 52 since 51.2 wouldn't be accepted by
IOS (ask the proctor
Hi Mark,
Please correct me if I'm wrong
POTS to POTS calls use G711 PCM codec.on all channels. Also we can verify
it on pstn router by sh active call voice
Telephony call-legs: 2
SIP call-legs: 0
H323 call-legs: 0
Call agent controlled call-legs: 0
SCCP call-legs: 0
Multicast call-legs: 0
Hi Mark, pls correct me if i'm wrong...
I for sure agree the path b2n PSTN router and BR2 is not VoIP, no doubt
about it... but it is G711 aka g711 (ulaw or alaw).
The function of the DSPs is to take the information from the digital channel
decode it and set it ready for the processor to
Hi all,
I have configured the phone ports on BR1 as follows, they get an IP from the
DHCP scope on CUCM server which I can see also with CDP on the router.
However they are not contactable via IP, if I clear the CDP table the addresses
disapear.
I can ping the default gateway, it is correct in
Thank you Mike .
You not only answered my question but also answered the other questions
that i,m sure i was going to face later on . specially about the Frame
relay shaping command on physical interface
cheers .:)
//Mo
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Mark Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have lost connectivity with proctor labs, my VPN client is connected but I
cannot access via the web.
I logged onto work to try a different ISP and that is the same.
Looks like that is the end of my lab for today ...
Trevor
I have had many replies and verification of my configuration, thank you all for
that.
Yes the VLANs were ceated and verified I could also ping the VLAN interfaces.
So the scenario is this the interfaces and vlans are configured correctly as is
the DHCP scope.
The phones pick up an address from
I just logged into pod 26 for my afternoon session. I will let you know if i
have problems.
Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions
7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD 20770 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 |
Proctor lab folks. POD26 subscriber is not accessible. I tried to open
a ticket for after hours support but both links sends you to the support
forum. I have posted the issue there as well.
Scott.
Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions
7601 Ora Glen
Hi,
For Cisco IOS Software Release 12.3(7)T or later the Pots dial-peer
configuration for MGCP gateway should like below or even service mgcpapp is
not needed ? Could you please correct me if I am wrong ?
dial-peer voice 10 pots
service mgcpapp
incoming called-number .
direct-inward-dial
16 matches
Mail list logo
