Hi,
is there anybody who is planning to take the new lab?
I've scheduled my first try for November.
Regards.
Bjoern
AFAIK, the simplest way would be to configure static mapping on gatekeeper:
!
gatekeeper
gw-type-prefix 1212221 gw ipaddr nonexisting GW IP@
!
Then for a DNIS == 1212221 the GK will return nonexisting i...@. Remember,
there is no fixed separator between tech-prefix and E.164 number, so
I have 11/16. RTP.
For now, unless I see another June date.
Kirchhof Björn wrote:
Hi,
is there anybody who is planning to take the new lab?
I've scheduled my first try for November.
Regards.
Bjoern
Hi
I would like to take CCIE Voice certifcation(before written and then Lab). I do
not know where e ehich tool I have to use in order to take the written exam.
Could you helpo me? I have already CCVP, and also UCCXD, and I have 2 years of
experience about UC area, working with a Cisco gold
Hi Alex,
But that seems like its for only for one DN, Do you think this will
work for say 121?
I guess, prefix will be 1212,
I am trying to make similar concept work,
I was trying Hop-off prefix . I guess this is same thing.
Did this work for you??
And I guess, this will work
Has anyone run into the problem where the CME dn's are registering even
though you have no-reg configured?I've tried a couple of different IOS
versions and I see the problem show up randomly.
- Scott
You can contact any VUE or Sylvin testing centers for written just like
your CCVP exams.
Once you passed the written, yon go to this site below to schedule a lab.
https://tools.cisco.com/CCIE/Schedule_Lab/
/Jin Jung...
Santi Cuni wrote:
Hi
I would like to take CCIE Voice
Reboot the router,
This happens to me almost every time.
/Jin Jung...
Scott ODonnell wrote:
Has anyone run into the problem where the CME dn's are registering
even though you have no-reg configured?
I've tried a couple of different IOS versions and I see the problem
show up randomly.
-
AFAIK, tech-prefix cannot contain wildcards.
So to use static mapping you have to either:
1/ map every unwanted full DN on GK to a nonexistent IP@
2/ figure out whether your unwanted DN start with common digit string and
configure shorter tech-prefix(es). Example:
Unwanted DNs are 1212221,
no-reg both _BEFORE_ gateway always does the trick for me on remote PL
racks.
Cheers
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Scott ODonnell
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 1:15 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME GK Registration
Has anyone run into
Thanks..
I will lab it up and try it.
/Jin Jung...
Alex wrote:
AFAIK, tech-prefix cannot contain wildcards.
So to use static mapping you have to either:
1/ map every unwanted full DN on GK to a nonexistent IP@
2/ figure out whether your unwanted DN start with common digit string
and
Also if you create an new ephone-dn and forget your no-reg command and
add it after the fact.. the only way to clear is by reloading the
router. If you do a show gateway you will notice the E.164 numbers
listed even after you executed the no-reg command. The only way that
I'm able to fix this is,
I have mine scheduled for august 12th
On Mar 27, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Kirchhof Björn bkirch...@bvg-
systems.com wrote:
Hi,
is there anybody who is planning to take the new lab?
I’ve scheduled my first try for November.
Regards.
Bjoern
Hi,
I have configured LLQ and FRF.12 LFI on my router, How to do shaping along with
FRF.12?
Gughan
Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at
http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/
There are two different ways. You can do it with class based shaping
(preferred) or non class based shaping depending on your needs.
Take a look at the QOS SRND. You should be very familiar with this as it will
be available to you in the lab. It will show examples of how to do this.
On the same token,
Does anyone one have right way to test FRF.12 LFI, MLP ... ?
I tried wireshark to capture packets, but it only captures from
Ethernet. and its not showing up correctly on ethennet side.
The only other way sis to use T-bird or smart-bit which I do not have.
Dobugs really
I am scheduled for November 13, 2009 here in RTP.
Quoting Kirchhof Björn bkirch...@bvg-systems.com:
Hi,
is there anybody who is planning to take the new lab?
I've scheduled my first try for November.
Regards.
Bjoern
All,
When you setup IPMA for mgr HQ ph1 x3001, and assistant SiteB ph1 x5001, in
your IPMA-RP x3001, what did you have for?
Forward Busy Internal
Forward Busy External
Forward No Answer Internal
Forward No Answer External
Forward No Coverage Internal
Forward No Coverage External
Forward On
/20090327/27e89e47/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:25:29 +0100
From: Kirchhof Bj?rn bkirch...@bvg-systems.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New LAB Scheduling
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID
Every test it out for all scenarios?
Put mgr DN with IPMA_mgr_CSS will satisfy this senario: if CTI RP
malfunction or cannot response, then call will go to mgr DN directly.
However, for these two scenarios:
During normal situation, call will be direct to proxy line, then proxy
line not
Probably a very elementary question but it's never been clear to me.
Regarding how prompt files are referenced within an IPCC script:
How do it related to WHERE the prompt files are expected to be?
Example
QueuePrompt = SP[ICD\ICDQUEUE.wav]
vs
QueuePrompt = P[myprompt.wav]
Truly understand where u were coming from. Was hit awhile ago on this and it
plagued me almost the whole day trying to understand IPMA when it comes to
AAR.
To summarize the whole thing, there isnt a trap to this. To answer your
question, I would set the EPNM on the proxy line - for eg, instead
Question for the group...
I have an issue where I call into BR1 at 2000. BR1 converts to 3004 and
sends to CCM via SIP. From there it should go to BR2 via the GK. I am
getting an unallocated/unassigned number in the BR1 debug q931. In the
HQ-RTR, debug gatekeeper, I am not getting any ARQ's. If
Found my own answer... The SIP trunk was in a G711 DP. I moved it to the HQ
DP and all is happy...
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:44 PM, scott wofford woffordsc...@gmail.comwrote:
Question for the group...
I have an issue where I call into BR1 at 2000. BR1 converts to 3004 and
sends to CCM via
fatai_adeku...@yahoo.com
Differences Between the AIM-CUE and the NM-CUE and NME-CUE Modules
Cisco Unity Express is supported on the advanced integration module
(AIM-CUE), the network module and extended capacity network module (NM-CUE
and NM-CUE-EC), and the enhanced network module (NME-CUE). Cisco Unity
Express
Thanks...
Mark Holloway wrote:
Differences Between the AIM-CUE and the NM-CUE and NME-CUE Modules
Cisco Unity Express is supported on the advanced integration module
(AIM-CUE), the network module and extended capacity network module (NM-CUE
and NM-CUE-EC), and the enhanced network module
Interesting. I did a lab with this same problem today.
In my case the gateway at BR1 was an H323 gateway. As such, a voip dial peer
with destination pattern 2000 was required. A translation profile was applied
to this dial peer converting the called number from 2000 to 3004. The dial
Forward No Answer Internal
Forward No Answer External
to 3001 with css-mgr-internal
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Jiahong - tobeccie Fang mo...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Jiahong - tobeccie Fang mo...@hotmail.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA question
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Friday,
30 matches
Mail list logo
