Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper config - solution for Single trunk, no BW CLI, no location, one call in sub and redundancy over PSTN

2009-04-17 Thread anil batra
Hi Prabahar,   On the call from CME, GK finds that the priority 10 trunk is already max out and tries the priority 9 trunk (pub) to make the call. I found that the call still goes thru H323-ID: CCM2CME_2 , even though there was one active call on H323-ID: CCM2CME_2 , the second call from CME

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Blue for VISTA

2009-04-17 Thread adefila seun
Hello,   Does anyone have the setup file for IPBlue compatible with VISTA.   the VTGO-PC-Lite-VEM-2.10.0 gives error when installing it on VISTA   Thanks

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread Tech Guy
This post was originally from Jeremy, but looking at portion of his config... ! zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 10 GK_Trunk_2 zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 9 GK_Trunk_1 ! gk-trunk_2 is given the highest priority of 10 for prefix 3... but look at his 'show gatekeeper gw' Prefix: 1#*(Defa

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice

2009-04-17 Thread Tech Guy
plus, you can build a whole R&S lab topology on a single good server platform or on your laptop, using dynamips, etc.you literally do not neccesary have to buy a single router or switch. Though, in addition to dynamips, it is advisable to get some online rack time. Tech Guy - Origi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice

2009-04-17 Thread Chris Parker
From an economic standpoint I'd say do R&S first. All other things being equal, the preparation for voice is more expensive no matter how you slice it (unless you happen to have everything on hand). R&S has more resources out there for preparation too. The workbooks are cheaper. The lab rentals

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread sean hurricane
No offense taken, thank you. it's my second attempt and i had my aha moment the first time. i have separated my self from my engineering ego, first time i went in with a chip on my shoulder, i had a good shot as my results were encouraging but the exam humbled me somewhat. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101

2009-04-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
ve some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i have most of the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from those who failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudyli

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
That's a good reminder and I thank you for understanding my NDA point. Also apologies if I offended Sean. There's always new people coming on here and a repeat of information isn't really to bad a thing. I also hoped to give a large enough range to not make it an NDA issue. X to Y would have

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101

2009-04-17 Thread sean hurricane
e wrong if you follow it. I scored perfect on the >>> qos sections and I practiced my calculations based completely from the >>> SRND values. Again, watch the videos on IP expert. >>> >>> >>> Good luck. >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> >>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101

2009-04-17 Thread Tech Guy
ppreciate any advice even from those who failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090417/06046ec9/attachment-0001.htm

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Copy from CCM TFTP to flash problem

2009-04-17 Thread Cyrus
Hi Jeremy, check your files permission. Add "Everyone" to your files permission or Inherit it from its parent. Then you can copy it to flash. Cyrus On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:19 AM, jeremy co wrote: > Well, > > I can copy from CCM tftp to cme flash, but interesting point is for example > I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread Bill Talley
Hi Sean, I don't have much advice to offer, other than don't be discouraged if you don't pass, as I've had my share of failed attempts. I also wanted to say I appreaciate you offering your personal email so list members didn't have to repeat advice to the list that may have previously been off

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101

2009-04-17 Thread sean hurricane
om: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of sean >> hurricane >> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:26 PM >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >> >&g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101

2009-04-17 Thread sean hurricane
e] LAB in five days > > > > My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have > passed. i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i > have most of the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from > those who failed, at least i wo

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to Force CCM Primary Call Processing Engine to be the Least preferred Gateway on Gatekeeper.

2009-04-17 Thread Tech Guy
BlankThe primary call processing engine in CCM is 192.168.15.52; but I want the PUB (192.168.15.51) to be the preferred gateway in gatekeeper; but is does not seem to be working. -start config- gatekeeper zone local CCM ipexpert.com 172.1.100.1 z

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread jeremy co
I have a prefix for it so why it didn't show up? gatekeeper zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 zone local CCM cisco.com no zone subnet CME default enable zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable no zone subnet CCM default enable zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable zone subnet CCM 150.1.6

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread sean hurricane
I don't believe i said anything about NDA, regarding IPCC, integration is not my problem and i can do most of the scripting, i am not just at a confident level where i can say scripting is a non-issue. if the script are as lengthy and difficult as ipexpert lab then i may struggle and just roll the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread Craig Hill (crahill)
I have taken it 2 times and I was very close to making it the last round. I would advise you to do the following: 1. Have a plan on how your going to attack the exam and stick to it. My first attempt I went in with no plan and it cost me time. 2. Practice speed drills after you formulate your pl

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
I have no nda stuff to share (either should anyone else) so no need for private e-mail. Taken from my experience: If it's your first time you will meet the following: Unfamiliar with environment. Unfamiliar with the PC, can't beat the nervousness, the anxiety, the frustrations you will encoun

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread sean hurricane
my e-mail address is shurric...@gmail.com if anyone wants to contact me privately. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM, sean hurricane wrote: > > My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have passed. > i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i have most of

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days

2009-04-17 Thread sean hurricane
My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have passed. i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i have most of the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from those who failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice

2009-04-17 Thread Michael Ciarfello
Obtaining a CCIE doesn't guarantee you a better job. Companies have become sophisticated enough to actually interview the people to validate the certs they have claim they reflect the person who has them. The company I work for has gotten rid of two CCIE's in our 7 year lifespan for various re

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice

2009-04-17 Thread Cliff McGlamry
There are far fewer voice CCIE's than there are R&S. That said, it's going to come back to supply and demand in your area. - Original Message - From: nikki h To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:18 AM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice

2009-04-17 Thread nikki h
I need some help on making a decision on when exam to study for.   I have both data/voice exp.   I want to take the ccie, I am not sure which one will be the best one to take. Which exam will give me more opt at getting a better job/higher position? Please help.   ccie voice or ccie routing an

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread Cliff McGlamry
They can overlap. It's okay for it to be that way as long as you have zone prefixes defined. Or give it a different prefixbut you need one in there for it to show up under that command. - Original Message - From: jeremy co To: marwa Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread jeremy co
1# is a default prefix for call manager, I added it already in CCM config Jeremy On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, marwa wrote: > > hi, > to see it add the tech prefix under the interface in cme > > - Original Message - > > *From:* jeremy co > *To:* Cliff McGlamry ; Sergio > Polizer

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread marwa
hi, to see it add the tech prefix under the interface in cme - Original Message - From: jeremy co To: Cliff McGlamry ; Sergio Polizer Cc: Marwa Ahmed ; Arshad Dhunna ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 4:24 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gateke

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread jeremy co
Hi, interface Loopback0 ip address 150.1.66.254 255.255.255.0 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CME ipaddr 150.1.64.114 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id RS2 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 150.1.66.254 CME is registered. C2600#sh gatekeeper end GATEKEEPER EN

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Copy from CCM TFTP to flash problem

2009-04-17 Thread jeremy co
Well, I can copy from CCM tftp to cme flash, but interesting point is for example I can copy a file from MOH folder on TFTP to flash , but if I copy a file that I created in that folder, it cannot access it, RS2#copy tftp:/MOH/ flash: Address or name of remote host [150.1.64.11]? Source filename

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread Cliff McGlamry
Just because the dots show up doesn't mean they will workbut heck, give it a try. We all might learn something. If CME won't register, what does the output of the show gateway command on CME show? And please post the configuration of the interface where you engaged the h323-gateway comman

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread Sergio Polizer
Check if you have the following commands at sitec: h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id HQ-RTR ipaddr h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1# h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr use, show gateway. Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:51:10 +1000 From: jeremy.coo...@gmai

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread Sergio Polizer
Check if you have the following commands at sitec: h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id HQ-RTR ipaddr h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1# h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr use, show gateway. Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:51:10 +1000 From: jeremy.coo...@gmai

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem

2009-04-17 Thread jeremy co
complete configuration is here: SUB is not started though. gatekeeper zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 zone local CCM cisco.com no zone subnet CME default enable zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable no zone subnet CCM default enable zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable zone subnet C

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Calls

2009-04-17 Thread adefila seun
thanks --- On Fri, 17/4/09, Otto Sanchez wrote: From: Otto Sanchez Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Calls To: adefilabi...@yahoo.co.uk, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Friday, 17 April, 2009, 1:16 PM Check your RP towards the CME (PT+ PATTERN) and calling phone CSS, this should

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Calls

2009-04-17 Thread Otto Sanchez
Check your RP towards the CME (PT+ PATTERN) and calling phone CSS, this should be the reason for the message, Later you can go to gatekeeper, perform some debugs (debug gatek main 10 + debug ras) and show commands (show gatek end + show gatek gw), and finally get to CME and troubleshoot there (

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Calls

2009-04-17 Thread Arshad Dhunna
Yes , Bec yr dial-peer is not matching. If the call is comming from Hq to CME what have u put incoming-called number in yr incoming dial-peer and what is the tech-prefix. If it does not match it gives u this message. If u want u can give me team viewer i can check and resolve in 2 mins. thks

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Calls

2009-04-17 Thread adefila seun
Hello All,   i have all the gatekeepers and trunks configured from the HQ to the Branch 2 with CME   When calls are placed from the HQ phones to the CME, it give number cant be dialled pls contact your directory and try again later   Any one with similar expeience   Am i missing something out tha