Hi All,
I need your help to know what all ports needs to be opened on Firewall for
this integration to work properly.
HQ = CCM 7.x Cluster , Unity VoiceMail, Meeting PlaceExpress , PSTN Gateway
Phones = SCCP
BR= CCME 3825 (H323)
Phones = SCCP
Both HQ and BR are connected via MPLS Link
I am trying to call forward all to a remote phone and then call forward
to the remote phones voicemail on no answer. Obviously the default
action is to forward no answer to the forwarding phone's vm box but I
want to change this. Is there a way anyone knows to do this?
Thanks
Phill D
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps2237/products_configura
tion_example09186a008065128f.shtml
Same thing goes for unity connection
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Phillip Day
Sent: Wednesday, 29 July 2009
There is also a global configuration option to perform call routing based on
last forwarding device instead of first forwading device. The doc Aamir posted
has a link to this for unity 5.X. There is also an option for this in CUC 7.X
This is a global property and as far as I know can't be set
hy ppl,
meet-me just has that one config page with partition,meetme number and
description right??...am i missing something?? i never get it to work..
the intercom is very much depended on the phone type right?? i have cipc and
the intercom options(in the admin pages) are shown but no intercom
Yep- ³auto qos voip fr-atm² within the DLCI will configure MLP LFI.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join our free online support and peer group communities:
Hy Joel,
Meet-me conference usage is in the xxx model end-user guide (I looked it up on
the 65 user guide.) Not sure if that's where you are going wrong.
Intercom is in the feature and services guide including what phones are
supported. Note difference between intercom vs auto answer on
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/7_0/CCM_7.0PortList.pdf
Try this. Note adding this level of security ends up being more of an art than
a science.
Note it's not a CCIE Lab related question, so assistance may be limited, but we
can try to help. Cisco netpro
On this same subject, is it possible for the auto qos voip fr-atm to
create a queue that will starve out all other traffic and destroy your
network?
Jonathan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Vik Malhivma...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Yep- “auto qos voip fr-atm” within the DLCI will configure MLP LFI.
Greetings guys,
i have setup CUCM 7cluster top of vmware. and i have activate Cisco IP Voice
Media Streaming App on the new subscriber. then under media resource i have
checked the registration and it says unknown. i tried to restart the media
streaming app. no luck. Then i disable the service
If you have FRTS enabled on the physical interface (WAN) at HQ which is used
for the 2 x PVC's to each of the branch sites then the default CIR is 56kbps
and the default MINCIR is 28kbps. This will have MAJOR repercussions for
your branch sites.
You should ensure a frame-relay map-class is used
Quick update..
i restarted the cluster after the restart media streaming service is not
getting up.
Any idea guys ?
thanks
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Ravindra Lakpriya lakpr...@gmail.comwrote:
Greetings guys,
i have setup CUCM 7cluster top of vmware. and i have activate Cisco
You may verify Run Flag under Service parameters. It should be True by
default but you can give it a try. If this will not work try restarting all
server. There can be strange things under Vmware.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Hi Vik,
I saw the auto qos voip fr-atm in the proctors guide and was wondering
about this.
I'm probably doing something wrong but my solution was to create
Virtual-template then apply multilink PPP + fragment/inter afterwards. -
along with map-class/policy-map/class-map with the defined
Within the virtual-template interface ppp multilink should be enabled and
the command ppp multilink fragment-delay 10 should also be configured when
auto qos voip fr-atm has been run. This will cause fragmentation of any
packets to be transmitted that will cause a serialization delay of greater
Also restart RIS Data Collector under Control Center Network Services.
This is responsible for reporting back the status of SCCP/MGCP/TAPI devices
that are registered to UCM.
--
Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Hi Cristi,
Thanks for the reply. I have tried that. but no luck.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Cristi Radescu
cristian.rade...@crescendo.ro wrote:
You may verify „Run Flag” under Service parameters. It should be True by
default but you can give it a try. If this will not work try
Hi Mick,
Under your Virtual template you will have the following commands:
- ppp multilink - enables MLP;
- ppp multilink interleave - enables real-time packet interleaving;
- ppp multilink fragment-delay 10 - configures a maximum fragment delay of
10 ms;
In this manner Auto QoS configure
Hello Michael,
Thanks for your link and reply I've checked this doc and have passed list of
port needed for this. Let see how it goes if any issue surely will check in
netpro or may opt for GRE tunnel.
Thanks
Arun
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Michael Ciarfello
mciarfe...@iplogic.comwrote:
Sorry that doesn't read right --
The solution for MLP I was looking at was something like this ... I couldn't
see how the auto qos commands would give you the same thing.
Int Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point
frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ppp virtual-template 1
class DLCI_202
Int
Hello Vik,
Thanks for the replay.
Yes i did that as well. I think this is something to do with the Vmware.
:-(.
Looks like have to rebuild the cluster again
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Also restart RIS Data Collector under Control Center Network
When the phones register do you see the status “registered”? Try a single
UCM cluster- take out the SUB from the CM Group.
--
Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join our free online
Yes Vik i can see that. I can register phones with this faulty sub as well.
but when i looks at the media resource it says unknown.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote:
When the phones register do you see the status “registered”? Try a single
UCM cluster-
We used auto qos when we produced the solutions. Your config that you posted
is pretty much the same as what auto qos voip fr-atm does except the
service-policy to invoke LLQ should be applied to the VT. Another important
ingredient within auto qos is FRTS on the physical interface.
--
Vik Malhi
Thanks for that.
Yup sorry it was off the top of my head (my previous post was such a mess).
I'm still a little lost on the auto qos voip fr-atm though. How do you
make it generate the virtual-templates etc ? From the PG it looks like you
can set the b/w and just enter the auto qos command.
I'm
The fr-atm bit in the auto qos command will force the router to use mlp
lfi (VT) as opposed to using FRF.12 so long as the bw = 768kbps
With ATM-FR Service Interworkings FRF.12 is not an option and that is why
auto qos makes this radical decision (to use MLP LFI). We are telling the
router the
Hi Vik,
Excellent -- thanks for that.
Best regards
Mick
E: m...@pobox.net.uk
From: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:55:55 -0700
To: Mick Vaites m...@pobox.net.uk, OSL Group
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos
The fr-atm bit in
Hello,
Has anyone tried using the HWIC-4ESW-POE on a 2801 in their lab? I have
one and it works except for the POE CLI doesn't even show the power
commands.
Chris
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
You need to upgrade the power on the router.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried using the HWIC-4ESW-POE on a 2801 in their lab? I have
one and it works except for the POE CLI doesn't even show the power
commands.
Chris
You will need the upgraded poe power supply for the 2801.
Jarrod
On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried using the HWIC-4ESW-POE on a 2801 in their lab? I
have
one and it works except for the POE CLI doesn't even show the
power
You will need 2 qty PVDM2/16 for each branch router. The lab module on
hardware conference bridging will require it and the single PVDM2/16 will
not allow you to configure any sessions after your VWIC is up.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
Hi all,
I
Actually I found my issue ... It has to be a 2801-AC-IP instead of a
2801 for the inline power to work
Chris Parker wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried using the HWIC-4ESW-POE on a 2801 in their lab? I have
one and it works except for the POE CLI doesn't even show the power
commands.
Good tip, thx!
Sent while mobile
On Jul 29, 2009, at 13:36, Nara Shikamaru
shikam...@kagadis.commailto:shikam...@kagadis.com wrote:
You will need 2 qty PVDM2/16 for each branch router. The lab module on
hardware conference bridging will require it and the single PVDM2/16 will not
allow you
Thanks ... looks like its $200 to change out the PS for the AC-IP
version think I'll pass.
Jarrod Phelps wrote:
You will need the upgraded poe power supply for the 2801.
Jarrod
On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried using the
Just an FYI, I got a AC-IP PS for my 2811 off ebay new in box for 89.00 they
are cheap on there.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us
To: Jarrod Phelps jarrod.phe...@gmail.com
Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:52 PM
Cool I'll keep my eye on it
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Mike O mik...@msn.com wrote:
Just an FYI, I got a AC-IP PS for my 2811 off ebay new in box for
89.00 they are cheap on there.
- Original Message - From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us
To: Jarrod Phelps
Guys,
Can we use 2621XM routers for the home lab. what are the limitation's of
that ?
thanks
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
Good tip, thx!
Sent while mobile
On Jul 29, 2009, at 13:36, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com wrote:
You will need 2
I'm having a problem on Vol 1 Lab 5A, question 5.11 with calling from HQ Phone
2 to 9011916745738932 which ends up with reorder tone. The gatekeeper debug
shows tech-prefix gateway selection failed. From the config, it should go to
10.10.110.3. Any thoughts?
*Jul 30 01:07:46.238:
there is no gateway registered with port 1820.
From: Kevin Damisch kevin.dami...@vitalsite.com
To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:18:26 AM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5A 5.11 gatekeeper issue
I’m having a
BR2 is registered with port 1720 but you have hardcoded gw-type-prefix
with 1820
**
gw-type-prefix 011* hopoff PL gw ipaddr 10.10.110.3 1820
GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
BR2-RTR already has h225 listen-port 1820 configured on it. Where else is it
needed?
Thanks,
Kevin Damisch
Vital Support Systems
From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 8:30 PM
To: Kevin Damisch; OSL Group
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab
depends?
you cannot do cme 7.x with it. Absent that I guess you can
Respectfully Charles George
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:47:29 +0530
From: lakpr...@gmail.com
To: j...@slash128.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home Lab Questions
Guys,
Can we use
Does your 2801 have the power supply that supports power to the ESW?
I ordered a Cisco2801-V/K9PWR-2801-AC and it had the wrong power supply
in it. I had to order the PWR-2801-AC-IP power supply and install it
myself.
The correct power supply should run the length of the back of the
chassis.
Well clearly BR2-RTR is not registered with 1820. On BR2 you may need
to stop start the service under voice service voip and then do no
gateway gateway to re-register the BR2 with GK
From: Kevin Damisch [mailto:kevin.dami...@vitalsite.com]
Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 11:35 AM
To: Aamir
I have a home lab related question - sorry for the thread jack but it seems
related and may help others as well.. Someone had posted a week or so ago
that they don't' recommend gen1 7940/60 phones due to SIP issues.
What is everyone using for phones? I have plenty of 7940/60's at my
disposal
7961's
Respectfully Charles George
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:46:41 -0400
From: j...@cia.net
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home Lab Questions
I have a home lab related question - sorry for the thread jack but it seems
related and may help others as
Thanks Otto and Aamir. Works like a champ!
But, let me extend this thread a bit further into question 5.12. There is
reference to a couple of dial peers on BR2-RTR:
Dial-peer voice 1000 voip
Destination-pattern [15]...
Session target ras
Voice-class codec 1
Tech-prefix 2#
Then, 3 pages
I would say that it is impossible to complete your study prep with 7960/7940
phones.
Not only are there the aforementioned SIP issues (BLF SD, KPML, EM, Presence
for Call Lists, Mobile Connect, etc) this phone model has no support for +
dialing which was covered extensively in the CCIE Voice
48 matches
Mail list logo
