Ben answered this in post #48 on February 2nd. Quick re-cap:
CUCM: 7.0(1)
3750 IOS: 12.2(44)SE
7965 Phones
CUPC/CIPC: 7.0(1)
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Amy Ryan wrote:
>
> Precedence has shown, they could upgrade a minor release for bug fixes,
> however, they would not test on any newly
Voice Candidates,
After working with a few customers I have verified that using
Virtual-Template interfaces seem to solve all problems that have been
discussed lately on the forum with new phone types lack of audio, etc.
Please make sure you are using the latest configuration templates when
con
Precedence has shown, they could upgrade a minor release for bug fixes,
however, they would not test on any newly supported features. If they were
to upgrade to version 8.X, they would have to announce it 6 months in
advance. This will be unlikely in the foreseeable future because they have
not
Hi,
If you are using calling Party Transformation CSS, try uncheck the "Device Pool
Calling Party Transformation CSS" at Remote Destination Profile.
If not, try to create a RP for your Remote Destination number and check "Use
Calling Party's External Phone Number Mask"
HTH, Sergio.
Date: Tue
I would think that the end result would be anything in the 7.X.X train is
testable. I don't forsee them jumping major revisions like that as the
additional content available is to be pretty substantial.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Saeed IDris wrote:
>
>
> Hi :
>
> First of all I would like
Guys I have a question related to UCCX and SQL
when you run a backup on UCCX in regards to SQL (backups / reindex) is that
included in the backup ?
What are the steps that i need to follow to get the versions upgraded to at
least SQL05?
thanks
Cris
_
Hi :
First of all I would like to Thanks community support from IP Expert , can
someone confirm the below line:
- CCIE Voice - Cisco .com:
“ *CCIE* *Software Versions:*
*Any major software release which has been generally*
*available for six months is eligible for testing in the*
*C
Hey Bas,
Thanks for the input. I will look into all of this later today.
Jeff
From: Bas Janssen [mailto:basmj...@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:03 AM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialing problem
Hi Jeff,
Hey Pavan,
You called it correctly.
I walked away for 20 mins after redoing the install and all worked.
Thanks so much for the answer.
-Scott
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Pavan wrote:
> Did you use thin disks?
> I got around this by provisioning thick disks and using 72GB
>
> Sent from m
All -
This is somewhat off-topic for the CCIE Voice lab... Well, it is actually
completely off-topic.
Is anyone here using a SNMP-based tool to monitor in real-time the DS0 usage of
your PRIs? We have been using PRTG enterprise for our data traffic. However,
I'm looking for something to mon
All that is needed is:
Ephone-dn XX
Number XXX (optional no-reg if in GK land)
Park-slot
U doing any CoR that would restrict access to the park slots?
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:35 AM, "Robert McGhee"
wrote:
Hi All,
What’s require
Hi All,
What's required to get call park working in CME? Just the
Park Slots? Anyone ever have the Park softkey show "inactive" and if so
what was the resolution?
Thank you.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CC
Manipulation on the H.323 gw will show up in the H.225 setup messages exchanged
during call setup if these commands isn't put in to the gw.
voice service voip
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update
Brgds,
Roger Källberg
Från: Mark Nigh [mn...@netellige
Hi Jeff,
I run into the same issue today, it was introduced on configuring + dialing.
So, call flow is for example 93942123--->trans. pattern--->
+12123942123>route pattern \+!->Route List --->GW--->called party
transform->3942123 type subscriber
Objective is to use only one route
Hi Guys,
Any clues on the query
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:02 AM, kavi ten wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> When I dial from 2001 to 2003 (SNR enabled for this extn) .
> The call goes to PSTN for mobile connect as configured.
> The calling Party No displayed is 2001 instead of full External NO mas
Jeff,
what do you mean with steady tone, a (delayed) second dial tone? In that case
look for overlapping route patterns with "play dial tone" switched off on some
of the route patterns? If it is in the direction PSTN phone ---> internal
phones, did you configure direct inward dial on the inc
16 matches
Mail list logo
