Dear All,
I am tring to add HQ as a gatekeeper to CUCM Pub but addition failed as
below message:
Status [image: Error Message] Add failed. One of the required fields on the
page has the same value as an entry that already exists in the database.
Please check the corresponding Find List page to
Dear Team,
I removed the gateway which has the same ip and i could add the
gatekeeper with same ip.
However i tried to add the h323 gateway again using same ip as gatekeeper ,
but it failed and give same error below
Status [image: Error Message] Update failed. One of the required fields on
Hi Omotayo,
Change the H.323 port back to 1720
You current config shows this, as changed in a previous lab.
h323
h225 listen-port 1820
It should be like this for B-ACD to work
h323
h225 listen-port 1720
Also see this post as it covers the same problem,
You can't have a H.323 gw and a GK registered on the same address in UCM.
Roger Källberg
Unified Communication Consultant
Cygate AB
From: Wael Agina [mailto:waelag...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 1 mars 2010 10:18
To: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Gatekeeper to CUCM Failure
Dear
Hi Shingei,
This maybe a long shot, but anyway, have you added the sub as a UCM server on
the pub before you tried to add it as a 2nd node?
Roger Källberg
Unified Communication Consultant
Cygate AB
From: ShinGei Yong [mailto:shingei.y...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 1 mars 2010 03:29
To:
Good point, Roger. CUCM Pub needs something to validate against.
- Sent from my Blackberry
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
To: ShinGei Yong shingei.y...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Easy workaround is to use a different interface or, even better, setup another
loopback.
- Sent from my Blackberry
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
To: Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com; OSL Group
I had a similar issue yesterdat, Randall. When I tried to revert, it wouldn't
go back to the original version. Although, I don't fully understand how PLs
revert command works.
- Sent from my Blackberry
- Original Message -
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Hi Patrick,
Thank you for solving the mystery. I upgraded my CIPC to 7.0.3 and it
works as you have mentioned.
Thanks
Kalyan
From:
Patrick Fischer myciscov...@gmail.com
To:
iy...@nationwide.com
Cc:
CCIE Voice OSL ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date:
02/28/2010 05:29 AM
Subject:
Re: [OSL |
Hello:
Otto, wich ccm traces do suggest me? All Phone Device Trace or trace by device
Thanks
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:31:54 -0430
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DTMF PROBLEM UNITY CON AND SIP PHONE
From: o...@ipexpert.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Enable All Phone Device Trace, MTP Trace and SIP Call Processing Trace,
Thanks,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Angel Perez gorr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello:
Otto, wich ccm traces do suggest me? All Phone Device Trace or trace by
device
Thanks
--
Date:
Otto thanks for your quick response
I'm working from my home lab
Finally the problem has been solved, the issue was the QOS policying (as you
suggested) after removing service-policy from the map class UC is receiving
digits perfectly
This is my qos config from BR1:
class-map
Hi everyone,
I am working on lab 5A. I was running into issues with gatekeeper routing
between CUCM and CME.
After completing the configs, I am successfully able to call from the CUCM
to CME. (i.e 5002 to 3002)
However, when I call from 3002 to 5002 or 1002, I get a message from the
Hello Kashif,
Were you able to sort this out, I am havin gsame issue. Or anyone out there can
guide me on this.
Thanks for your help,
Anil
--- On Sat, 1/2/10, kashif Masnoon kashif...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: kashif Masnoon kashif...@yahoo.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC client
Hello:
Reload the server, sometimes this issue happend, this should resolve the problem
hth
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:09:10 -0800
From: anil...@yahoo.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; kashif...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC client alternates between Desk Phone and
It appears that the 5xxx DNs are NOT available to the BR2 CSS
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:50 PM, iy...@nationwide.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am working on lab 5A. I was running into issues with gatekeeper routing
between CUCM and CME.
After completing the configs, I am successfully able to
Thanks Mathew, I used another interface for GK and lo for GW :)
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Berry, Matthew J.
mjbe...@krollontrack.comwrote:
Easy workaround is to use a different interface or, even better, setup
another loopback.
- Sent from my Blackberry
--
I did run into that and you can only use a particular IP once. So just use a
different interface and it will be ok! I was scratching my head on this one
haha!
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mathew, I used another interface for GK and lo for GW :)
Angel, tried but no luck still
--- On Mon, 3/1/10, Angel Perez gorr...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Angel Perez gorr...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC client alternates between Desk Phone and
Soft Pohne mode.
To: anil...@yahoo.com, osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
If you have the BR2-RTR IP address defined in UCM (as an H323 gateway/Trunk)
then it is this CSS that is used and not the CSS of the trunk.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Live Assistance, Please
Is this the correct configuration (below), applying compression header ip rtp
to the voice class? When I assign it to the class class-default of the
policy-map cbase-shaping compression works and I see it increment, but the SRND
states I need to apply it to the voice class? Thanks for your
Hi Mark,
Your configuration is good, the right place to configure the compress
header ip rtp command is within the child policy (as SRND stated), remember
that rtp header compression is a cpu intensive task and you don't want the
router to compress all rtp traffic going though the wan link, only
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have been
to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West on
Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a u-turn at Champion to get to the
Bldg C driveway where the lab is :-)
Unfortunately, I failed my
Hi,
When using mgcp the isdn outgoing display-ie command is not needed in the
rtr's serial interface as this information will be controlled from the ucm
itself (mgcp controls l3), so only checking or unchecking the Display IE
Delivery check-box will allow or restrict the name presentation to the
dude, I had all kinds of things that i was queueing up to say to you (and
none of them were nice with how flippant you were being about passing the
exam), but that was f$#ing funny!!!
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the
LOL. Thats fantastic man.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have
been to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West
on Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a
LOL Gratz
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have
been to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West
on Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a u-turn at
Great.
Now if I book it in San Jose I know I won't pass it.
Its like you jinxed me.
-jeff
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have
been to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you
Congratulations MAN :)
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have
been to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West
on Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a
Hi Roger, Berry,
Am already did that a few times, adding, removing and re-adding the CUCM-Sub
into the cluster inventory, but still got no chance to get it work.
I think i've out of my mind, can't think of any possibilities.
Anyone else can help?
Thanks
Shingei
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:35 PM,
Hello,
Anyone with a clue?
Regards
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Omotayo adefilabi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
working on Vol 1 lab 4
Calls from hq and Bri to br2 works with all sccp phones
with sip phone( i used xlite) at br2
when the sip phone calls hq/br1
Calls continues to ring
31 matches
Mail list logo
