Hi,
I set up a barge simply by enabling built-in-bridge and set privacy to ON
for all phones. Also assigned "private button" to all phones that have the
shared line.
When privacy button is on ,( lamp is turned on) , I call from shared line to
the another phone. But that phone see calling numbe
Hey guys,
I am new to the proctor labs, I just signed up. Now I am in the process of
gathering everything I need. Quick poll, what type of router do you guys
have for the ezvpn thing? What is your recommendation?
I am going to have internet off of a cable modem so one ethernet port on my
router wi
Thanks so much Bill. I will try now. :)
Cheers,
Vincent
2010/8/4 Bill Lake
> To run multiple soft phone VTGO lite
>
> First download the program from the site
>
> http://www.ipblue.com/download.asp?product=vtgo
>
> If your PC has multiple NIC just assign one IP blue phone per NIC, but
> if you
To run multiple soft phone VTGO lite
First download the program from the site
http://www.ipblue.com/download.asp?product=vtgo
If your PC has multiple NIC just assign one IP blue phone per NIC, but
if you do not, then create MS loopback adapters by:
1) For XP go to control panel>add hardware>in
Hi Bill,
Thanks for that. Just quick one, is there a way to let the softphone "IP
blue" to get the different IP address, because I need to deploy them into
different sites. I have done a lot research, but did not find anything.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Vincent
2010/8/4 Bill Lake
> For me
Hi Wafik,
Thanks for your great comments, just a little confuse for the two command"
priority-queue output" and " srr-queue bandwidth shape"
My question is if "regarding that enabling the priority (expedite) queue
will exclude queue 1 from the SRR shaping and sharing." why there is a
example in t
For me, I think that having a lab at home is important. It allows me
to do short sessions of lab work without renting a full 8 hours of
rack space. This way I can practice things anytime I want. I have a
Intel i7 quad core PC with two HDD set up using VMWare ESXi to house
CUCM (Pub&Sub), CUPS and
Thanks.
From: bkvalent...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:19 PM
To: CCIE Voice GMAIL; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping
I believe the qos srnd is provided on the computer's desktop in off format
w
I believe the qos srnd is provided on the computer's desktop in off format
when you take the lab exam. No need to find it through the web interface.
- Reply message -
From: "CCIE Voice GMAIL"
Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2010 6:02 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping
To:
Has any
I did uncheck "Wait for H245". This now appears to be working. I just went
home for the night and came back to find it working. I love it when that
happens.
From: amr thabt [mailto:amrth...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 1:31 AM
To: cisco voip
Cc: CCIE Voice GMAIL; OSL Group; Mi
Has anyone figured out how to access this through the documentation site?
Ive been using the search function and looking through all of the menus
without any luck.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Berlinski
Se
Hello there
Check this path in the SRND
WAN Aggregator QoS Design - WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design - Frame Relay
- Slow-Speed (£ 768 kbps) Frame Relay Links, then turn the page and you will
find it.
HTH
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Stutz, Bernhard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In Proctorlabs th
Thanks very much for this. I will read more carefully about this topic
looking carefully for the words in the documentation I could not find to
come with some conclusion as yours. Your answer makes sense and it is very
objective and I appreaciate that because this topic has beend discussed many
ti
I'm curious to hear the opinions of those here in regards to how
you've gone about studying. What's worked? What hasn't? What would you
do differently? etc., etc.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipe
Hi all,
In Proctorlabs there is always mentioned that the QOS SRND provides a adequate
example for class-based shaping but i can't find them.
Also i heard rumors that the QOS SRND document provided at the labs is not at
Cisco Website available anymore. However i can find a version here:
htt
Giving it a second thought I have to agree with you. I might have
misinterpreted what Vik said (sorry Vik). So it seems it's impossible to
have both priority-queue out and some form of shaping for this traffic?
regards
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Wafik Maher wrote:
> ut the priority traffic
I am thinking using the bandwidth limit command would limit ALL queues to that
rate not just the priority queue. Also see below response from "ask the
experts" stating buffers and thresholds have no effect on bandwidth. I am
thinking now maybe to adjust the INGRESS priority queue bandwidth sett
Ah damn. You mean I suffered through the crappy old exam for nothing? Oh
well :)
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Jeff Garvas wrote:
> *
> Just got this today... as I'm sure many of you will/have:
>
> Now Available: Updated CCIE Voice Written Exam Topics*
> Cisco has updated the written exam p
*
Just got this today... as I'm sure many of you will/have:
Now Available: Updated CCIE Voice Written Exam Topics*
Cisco has updated the written exam portion of its popular CCIE Voice
certification. The written exam topics for the CCIE Voice written exam are
now available on the Cisco Learning N
Hi Daniel,
I absolutely agree with you on the first part, regarding that enabling the
priority (expedite) queue will exclude queue 1 from the SRR shaping and
sharing.
However, I don’t think that it is possible to control the bandwidth
percentages using the buffer size allocation “mls qos queue-
--
Muzzamil Abdulghani Ahmed Agha
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
--
Muzzamil Abdulghani Ahmed Agha
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Hi All,
I have an idea on combining ingress and egress queuing feature of 370
switch, but I'm not sure I'm going down the right path.
What it should do is provide LLQ service for COS5 and without starving other
queues. My theory is ,I can provide LLQ service for COS 5 on ingress queue
and then
Did you try transcoder register to telephony-service and mtp register to UCM
and enable faststart inbound and outbound ,chech mtp and uncheck waiting for
h245 media capability in the trunk configuration
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:57 AM, cisco voip wrote:
> As per srnd.. there are some three comm
24 matches
Mail list logo