You need to create a map-class and set your cir, mincir, be, etc and apply it
to the affected frame-relay interface. What your seeing is expected behavior
once auto qos applies frame-relay traffic shaping to the main interface.
Sent from my iPad
KP
On Aug 5, 2011, at 7:58 PM, donny f wrote
CUCM by default does slow start and cube does fast start, that is
called an interworking issue. You can try the following:
Make CUCM fast start by adding a valid resource with the right codec
on CUCM and on the MTP or you can add the "call start interwork"
command under voice service voip on the CU
Hi all.
I am using cisco 2801 with 2 fxo cards. Running CME
version 7. I am using 7940 phone. Now is there anyway that when the user
of 7940 press line 1, he gets FXO line 1, and when he press 2 he gets
FXO line 2.
Is this possible or do i need to define outside access code for both these
li
I believe if you apply the bandwidth command before applying auto qos you
will not see this effect. So for HQ-SC add statement bandwidth > 768
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:58 PM, donny f wrote:
> hi all,
>
> when I run "auto qos voip trust " on HQ-- SB with BW 384. My HQ-SC
> become 56k CI
thx. it works for me .
-- Original --
From: "khaled Saholy";
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 11:00 PM
To: "bruno.juniper"; "gwenzit";
"ccie_voice";
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to make
UCSInstall_UCOS_8.5.1.1-26bootable
Hi.
I am stuck on the same place today as well on the same POD 34.
any guidance will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
On 06-Aug-2011, at 12:11 AM, Ilham Jabir wrote:
> DHCP settings are correct. Cross checked again. Phone has got the correct IP
> as well.
> Default rtr settings also correct.
>
> Can
configure 2 different line to use the 2 fxo line separately... i mean each
fxo line will be under separate partition and css...
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Cisco Voip wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am using cisco 2801 with 2 fxo cards. Running CME version 7. I am using
> 7940 phone. Now is there an
CME doesn't have css/partitions... instead, use COR.
Now, how exactly is this a ccie lab exam study question? There are no FXO
ports on the lab exam.
- Reply message -
From: "Shabeeb Mohammed"
Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2011 9:40 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXO lines !
To: "Cisco Voip"
Cc:
Hello,
I have an issue with BLF Call list, I am not able to see the DN status from the
directory. The only way it works if the DN is in null partition.
I did the following:
Phone 1 : 1000 PT_1
Phone 2: Subscribe CSS: CSS that contains only PT_1
both of the phones are in the same default Presence
I believe that there are no FXO line configs in the lab.. im not sure thou..
and yes, for CME you will have to use COR..
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 6:42 PM, bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote:
> CME doesn't have css/partitions... instead, use COR.
>
> Now, how exactly is this a ccie lab exam study question
My 3750 is having problems. First it had problems booting and now I'm getting
an error ** %ILPOWER-5-ILPOWER_POWER_DENY: Interface Gi2/0/8: inline power
denied **.
I looked this up in the output interpreter and this was the output I received:
** %ILPOWER-5-ILPOWER_POWER_DENY (x1):Interface
Hi all,
I am having the most difficult time getting an image on my cme 7961 phone. I
know my files are correct because the List.xml and the photos work fine if I
register the same phone to CCM.
the directories are in flash and I have also added the tftp-server flash:
commands pointing to thos
Does anyone now the command to tell the switch its NOT a member of a
switchstack and how to turn off switch stack election?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE an
You probably want to verify using the online power calc but the ps you have
really isn't designed for poe. Generally id put a minimum 750w ps in a poe
switch
On Aug 6, 2011 4:24 PM, wrote:
> My 3750 is having problems. First it had problems booting and now I'm
getting an error ** %ILPOWER-5-ILPOW
Michael,
I guess I'm not using the switch I thought I was in my home lab. I have 2
phones plugged in and using 24w (as expected). The code version I'm running is
12.2(46)SE. Can you shoot over the full output of "show power inline"
As for your question about switch master status check out th
This is not a power supply issue, if he did not have a PoE capable power
supply he would not even get a listing of the PoE power. Here is a sample
from a 3560 that is a 48 port model and is PoE
It has 370 watts to disperse to the ports. That is less than 10 per port in
my case but since say a 79
So this is interestingI can duplicate Michael's scenario.
I have two phones plugged into my 3750. Here is the show power inline output:
Module Available Used Remaining
(Watts) (Watts)(Watts)
-- - -
1 370.0 30.8
Interesting, perhaps Michael had that or because the switch seemed to be a
part of a stack, 2/0/8 then it might be that. I know switches that were part
of a stack act in an unreliable manner out of the stack
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Bryan Byrne wrote:
> So this is interestingI can dup
Hi Mike,
It appears as if the PSU on the switch is faulty. Have you tried connecting
a non-PoE device to see if that works fine? Or perhaps give power to the
phone via a power brick and see if it registers as expected.
If you don't have any device connected to the switch, then there should
defini
Hello -
The call flow I am working on looks like this
hq-phone(sccp)->gk->cube->cme-phone(sccp). I am working on Vol 2, Lab 1,
Sections 4.2 and 5.1. The requirement in 4.2 is to "ensure supplementary
services are working on UCM and UCME" while routing calls through the
GK/CUBE. My gatekeeper con
On CME just put on the dial-peer something like destination-pattern 999T and
then on the ephone-dn for that ext just enter the command "trunk 999" and
assign that ephone-dn to button 2 on the ephone, when the user presses button 2
for example and makes a call, it will prepend the 999 on the call
Switch finally would not boot. It stayed at the switch: prompt. The image was
corrupt. Had to XMODEM new image onto the switch. The switch finally booted
up with the new code, but had all kinds of trace backs. Turns out the front
end controller in the switch was flaky and POE was dead.
Had
22 matches
Mail list logo
