Anyone know how to verify the voice gateway send the dtmf through the PRI
port? Any debug command or ccm trace we can get?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and lo
Good To know you fix it , and its always my pleasure to help
Ash
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:52 PM, wrote:
> Hi Ash,
>
> I stand corrected, I had uploaded the license file.
> I was at the point right after the initial setup completes and prompts
> you to close your browser.
>
> At that point, it p
I need some help clarifying where I need transcoding for a UCCX where the
trigger DN is located across the WAN (Site B)
I have the MGCP GW in Site B in a Device Pool (SiteB)
UCCX CTI-RP is in Device Pool (SiteB)
and CTI-Ports are all in Device Pool (HQ)
Per my region configuration, g.729 is requ
Hi Ash,
I stand corrected, I had uploaded the license file.
I was at the point right after the initial setup completes and prompts
you to close your browser.
At that point, it presented the jtapi error.
I got it working though.
I ran setup /x from the UCCX media image and uninstalled UCCX.
I the
What do you mean ? Where are you at exactly in the CCX installation ?
Screenshot?
Ash
On Thursday, December 8, 2011, ccielabrat wrote:
> I can't get to the point to upload the license.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Ashraf Ayyash
wrote:
>>
>> do you have the License uploaded to the CCX , t
I can't get to the point to upload the license.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Ashraf Ayyash wrote:
> do you have the License uploaded to the CCX , this can happen when you
> have no license
>
> Ash
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 PM, ccielabrat wrote:
> > I just wanted to do some testing on
That is a great Idea.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 8, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Ashraf Ayyash wrote:
> You can get it from the UCCX server in the prompt file ,
>
> Ash
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, William Affeldt
> wrote:
>> Does anyone have a silent Moh file already created that I can
You can get it from the UCCX server in the prompt file ,
Ash
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, William Affeldt
wrote:
> Does anyone have a silent Moh file already created that I can use?
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE L
Does anyone have a silent Moh file already created that I can use?___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Try to use error disable feature. I am not sure if it has a condition to match
phones.
I will try to lab it to night and will let u know.
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 8, 2011, at 7:50 PM, Chris Martin wrote:
> So I am working on the new 5-lab pack from IPX, in lab 4
do you have the License uploaded to the CCX , this can happen when you
have no license
Ash
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 PM, ccielabrat wrote:
> I just wanted to do some testing on UCCX so I booted a vmware image of UCCX
> that I've used before.
> It's a fresh install with no integration.
>
> Whe
I just wanted to do some testing on UCCX so I booted a vmware image of UCCX
that I've used before.
It's a fresh install with no integration.
When I log in, it says the JTAPI is out of sync.
I've fixed the JTAPI problem related to moving C:\windows\java files to
c:\winnt\java
It wants me to rerun
Yes it does. Both CALLING and CALLED funtion the same way.
Think of a call.. Phone 5001 calls 9777.
RP -> 9.[2-9]XX with calling xform of ENM + called xform predot. CUCM
caches the changes ANI= +12027775001, DNIS = 777. The DNIS is then
updated on phone display and RL is selected.
*The calling party transformation patterns need to be matched on the
pre-RP/RL digits. *
**
*Does it goes for CALLED Party as well?*
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Chris Martin wrote:
> Anytime. I have done the same thing before!
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, ccielabrat
So I am working on the new 5-lab pack from IPX, in lab 4 step 1.2 you are
asked to cause a port on the 3750 to go into error disable status if a non
cisco phone is connected. Unfortunately the DSG is not available yet for
this lab. Here is what I have thought but the problem with this solution is
Anytime. I have done the same thing before!
Chris
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, ccielabrat wrote:
> Hey Chris,
>
> Great catch.
> You were spot on with your advice.
>
> Thanks for correcting my thinking.
>
> I guess it doesn't make sense as I think about it now, but I thought by
> the time t
Hey Chris,
Great catch.
You were spot on with your advice.
Thanks for correcting my thinking.
I guess it doesn't make sense as I think about it now, but I thought by the
time the gateway got the call had "left" CUCM and any reference to external
# mask, etc. wouldn't be relevant.
So I was trying
Thanks Chris,
I'll look into that now.
So , with this in mind, should I be able to "check" the use external # mask
within the calling party transformation and then apply a "XX" mask?
or do I have to match against the 4 digit DN and then prefix the DN in the
mask?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at
What pattern do you have setup for Calling Party Transformations? You
mention you are seeing + Globalized numbers in your isdn q931 debug, this
leads me to believe you have a RP/RL with External Number Mask applied. My
guess is you are trying to match on the Globalized Calling numbers in your
cal
Hello,
I have a problem with UCCX Locations.
I have defined two CUCM locations - HQ and BR1
Both Location are configured with 24kbps, so that only 1 G729 call will be
allowed between those locations.
BR IP Phones are assigned the BR1 Location, and HQ IP Phones along with
UCCX CTI Router Point a
If you use multicast MOH don't worry about MOH location. Whatever
configured is ignored.
For other media resources , it may inherit from device pool location.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:52 PM, datucha123 datucha123
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Unfortunately, I cannot get the idea of Location assignement fo
In practice, the PS-ALI database contains everything the PSAP needs (in
theory), hence no need for calling name to go with the call.
In the lab, do only what is asked, nothing more, nothing less. If there is
no explicit requirement to ensure calling party name is displayed, don't
worry about it.
Hello,
Unfortunately, I cannot get the idea of Location assignement for Media
resources like MTP, Conf_Bridge and etc.
I guess, that Ann, Conf_Bridge and MoH needs the locations, so that it can
be controlled, how many calls they can receive.
But why the MTP and Transcoders do not have a Location
Hello Ken,
I can only answer the last question. I am not familiar with PSAP. But I do
remember something real cool when I was in the United States. If you call
911, even if the call didn't ring, they still manage to know that a call
was placed to emergency services and they returned the call immed
Hello,
I have a question about the RSVP reservation, but for mixed codecs.
For instance, if i want to reserve 2 g729 and 1 G711 call using RSVP, I
have to made the following calculation:
(24 * 2) + 80 +16 = 144
I want to say that if we are using mixed codecs, we have to plus 16 only
once, becu
Hello everyone.
As I know the Gatekeeper CAC does not care for the cRTP, and it only cares
for Payload Size (Sampling Size).
So for G729 calls, the GK will reserve 16 kbps, whether there is cRTP or
Not.
But if the Sampling size is changed for instance to 30ms, then the GK will
reserve 15.9 kbps
I agree with you .. Better to put it in the exam even if no difference.
Let's make it the ideal way.
Regards,
Mohd Baqari
From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 2:31 PM
To: Mohammed Al Baqari
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subjec
As I guess, it is better to use the old variant (take into account 75%) at
least for the Exam. Am I right?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Mohammed Al Baqari wrote:
> You are right … I just checked my notes and found this ..
>
> ** **
>
> *It’s important to note that **max-reserved-bandwidt
You are right . I just checked my notes and found this ..
It's important to note that max-reserved-bandwidth command won't function in
case of CBWFQ for IOS 12.4(15)T and later
Many thanks for the document and the memory refreshment . J
Note: Still the concept of min-max approach ment
Here is what I have done and test:
policy-map test1
class test1
bandwidth percent 80
class test2
bandwidth percent 19
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
service-policy output test1
As you can see, the interface is left
But still if you keep max-reserve to 75%, under your classes you can't
configure more than 75% of total bandwidth. The command will throw an error of
not enough bandwidth if u try to do so. So if all classes are congusted
(including default class), u won't get more that 75% on non-default classe
You are right.
I think that we are just think in different ways, but the results are the
same :).
And what about the GK CAC? As I know it takes 2 x Payload. For
instance G729 will take 16kbps, and G711 - 96kbps. But that is for 20ms
sampling rate. And if I change the Sampling rate, the GK will ch
I believe you have not applied the *allow-connection h323 to h323* command
under *voice service voip *on your h323 gateway.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Ray wrote:
> also make sure the mobile voice access is setup under media resources and
> also make sure the 4 digit ext on the RDP has a
I am not saying its wrong :) its correct ...
But my point is that this is because of switch trust/untrust concept. Now you
can call it as you want (e.g. Policy map reset dscp to 0)
But if u try to enable trust on policy as well as applying the command set dscp
to 0, u will find that trust take
Confirmed ... You can see this as well as cucm traces
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 8, 2011, at 12:44 PM, datucha123 datucha123 wrote:
> Please confirm that CUCM standard location does not care the L3 and Sampling
> Rate - It will always reserve 24kbps for g729 and 80
You can refer to QoS admin guide for 3750 or 3560 where it is said that by
default each class-map in policy map has "set dscp 0" command. (I do not
remember the page exactly, but it's there.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Mohammed Al Baqari <
baqari.voic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It’s not the pol
Please confirm that CUCM standard location does not care the L3 and
Sampling Rate - It will always reserve 24kbps for g729 and 80kbps for G711.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:42 PM, datucha123 datucha123 wrote:
> Well, I do not have any docs about the cRTP and RSVP.
> I have just heard from ADV Tech
Well, I do not have any docs about the cRTP and RSVP.
I have just heard from ADV Tech Class Videos that RSVP takes cRTP as well.
But I agree with Mohammed that RSVP cares for payload only.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Mohammed Al Baqari wrote:
> Please share any of these docs and let’s test
Yes, I have tested it on T - 12.4(22)T version.
I have made the following tests:
When configuring the CBWFQ Classes, the sum of bandwidth percent commands
must not exceed 75%. But on my IOS version I could get it to 99% (1% is
reserved for class default), so the document is true for my IOS.
On T
39 matches
Mail list logo
