Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Krishna
all, yesterday i took my second attempt in rtp, and i am 200 % sure that i pass the exam. I got 1 hour left even after testing it thrice, but looking at the score report i was shocked, and i completely disagree with my score report. F... CCIE lab script evaluation.. i am completely pissed off t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Cory Gray
Krishna, I am sorry to hear that. I suffered something similar during my last attempt but after much thinking I think I know what happened and maybe the same happened to you. Even though IPexpert recommends using switchport mode trunk on ESW interfaces I still had been using switch mode ac

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Mohamed Hassan
you remind me of my last attempt, i was coming our from exam and confident that i will pass, but i found the score full of zeros :((( but maybe one question like gatekeeper or QoS causes to fail in all questions. One more attempt friend and let's do it. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Krishna w

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Craig Hill (crahill)
Don't give up. I failed on my Oct attempt, and I am going back again in Nov. Give yourself some time to cool off, and then try to think back about the sections you failed. Sometimes you can have everything working correctly, but miss some of the fine details of what the exam was asking to see. T

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Krishna
Cory, Technically speaking, the grading has to be evaluated by taking the seating position where we took the exam rather doing it remotely for their convenience. i used switchport mode trunk, switchport trunk native vlan data on sb and sc.  " Can anyone expect fail in the exam after evaluating

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Cory Gray
Krishna, I had some funny things going on with my rack but cannot get into it because of NDA. I am extremely frustrated. I would tell you this. I am already a CCIE in R&S and work for Cisco. I am not sure if you have CCIE yet. I know it is frustrating, expensive, and time consuming but as

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Krishna
Hassan, regarding gatekeeper also i tested everything line by line, and i am pretty sure everything is working as expected and also regarding domain name for gatekeeper i approached proctor and he says use whatever you want for gatekeeper call routing between hq,sb and sc. I shutdown the gateke

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Krishna
Cory, i really appreciated your motivation skills, but looking at the score report i am unable to understand where i did wrong and so how can i comprehend myself by looking at the lab result, and taking exam one more time. i would say that cisco should give us a statement feedback for what had

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Leslie Meade
Plus, I still think that they will stop marking as soon as they know you won't pass. Sp parts you know you nailed, you will see a zero Sent from my iPad On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:35 AM, "Krishna" mailto:vinayak_...@yahoo.com>> wrote: Cory, Technically speaking, the grading has to be evaluated by

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Cory Gray
Krishna, I understand, I have had 100% on call routing in previous labs at the same time not having 100% on the gateway section. That does not make sense. Cisco does not tell how they grade each section but the proctor will tell you it is part automatic and part manual for voice. We are a

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

2012-10-31 Thread Craig Hill (crahill)
Hey, I was hoping to get some input on my QoS calculations for header compression. I have been using the Cisco 360 program, and in their exercise workbooks it takes into account the 4 byte checksum for UDP, but I ran Wireshark in my lab to confirm the values. From what I see, the UDP Checksum i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

2012-10-31 Thread Cory Gray
Use 2 bytes for cRTP. 1 FRF.12 G729 call should be as follows: G729 Sample in bytes – 20 IP/UDP/RTP in bytes – 2 (cRTP) Layer 2 overhead in bytes – 8 (FRF.12) Packeterization Rate – 50 Convert bytes to bit (20 + 2 + 8) * 8 = 240 Multiply bits by packet rate 240 * 50 = 12,000 bits = 12k

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Dan Quinlan (daquinla)
Krishna, All, I had a similar experience in my attempts. My attempt in May scored much better than my attempt in June, but in June I was certain that I had done much better than in May. Without breaking NDA, I can say this: there are certainly things which can destroy you score on multiple se

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Mark Holloway
If memory serves me correctly, if they reach a point in the lab grading where you've already reached the failing mark, they don't proceed to grade the rest of the exam and you just get Fail for remaining sections. I cannot verify that though and it has been two years since I passed. I took my f

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Cory Gray
You are correct in that the proctor will tell you all equipment is back in San Jose. I have experienced the slowness you speak about in RTP but live 12 minutes from there so I will not be switching locations :) -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unified FX Problems.

2012-10-31 Thread Michael.Sears
Greetings, For help with Phone View contact: http://www.unifiedfx.com/ in the lower right hand corner of page click on Questions. Talk to Stephen Welsh if you can he's the expert and has keep me going through the ups and downs of Phone View which works perfect for me. You can also email the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Marko Milivojevic
Krishna, You can always open a case with the certification support and state your reasons. While there is no regrade for the voice lab, Cisco has in the past issued retake vouchers for people who have been wronged by the grading... if it was indeed the grading issue. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Marko Milivojevic
This can also be true. While I personally think it's an unfair practice on their behalf, I believe that for manually graded labs this is exactly what happens. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Leslie Meade wrote: > Plus

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] PhoneView licensing...with vrack session?

2012-10-31 Thread Brian Calverley
Hello all, i'm just getting started using ProctorLabs and phoneview. I downloaded the s/w and can pull my phones from CUCM but cant seem to do anything further...like make a call. I had to run it as Administrator on my WIn pc and ran "Ativate Free Mode" Do i need a license for PhoneView? I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Krishna
Marko, i opened case with support, and i hope i will get some good feedback . I appreciate your help. thank you krishna. From: Marko Milivojevic To: Krishna Cc: Cory Gray ; Online Study Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_V

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Leslie Meade
I seem to remember that someone has been down this path and it did not end well. They touted the we do not do remarks blah blah... But I hope you get a better response Sent from Samsung Mobile Krishna wrote: Marko, i opened case with support, and i hope i will get some good feedback . I a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PhoneView licensing...with vrack session?

2012-10-31 Thread Marko Milivojevic
Brian, I think this question is best answered by our tech support - supp...@proctorlabs.com (in CC). I suppose this is a common issue and they are very experienced dealing with those. :-) -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:37

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Krishna
All, I have a very strong evidence that supports my statement, and in case if i don't get good feedback or positive response, I will approach lawyer and take it to the court for justice so that no others would get affect in future. thank you krishna. From: Le

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off

2012-10-31 Thread Marko Milivojevic
It's very hard to have any evidence to speak of when you're not allowed to take anything out of the lab. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Krishna wrote: > All, > > I have a very strong evidence that supports my statem

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW and switch config

2012-10-31 Thread virajith
hi Guys, I am just wondering if one can practice the labs without a ESW module . I have a setup in with I am using a switch (3750) for the vlan config. Is an ESW module necessary for the lab practice? How is the above config on 3750 different from using an ESW module? -Vir __

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW and switch config

2012-10-31 Thread Cory Gray
You should be fine without one just know that the recommended ESW config is Switchport mode trunk Switch trunk native vlan X (X equals data vlan) Switch voice vlan Y (y equals voice vlan) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf