my configuration was in place.
I want to thank everyone on this mailer for their continued support and
knowledge sharing. I wish everyone luck!
Thanks,
Jason Lee
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.i
Not sure it makes any difference in this situation, but I never use codec
pass-through on my configuration. I've never had any issues.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
> --MJ
>
> Your problem is a misconfigured location somewhere in CUCM.
>
> Your configuration on the gateways is correc
I had the same impression as Bill. It would be very interesting if that was
the case.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:49 AM, William Bell wrote:
> Pixar,
>
> Are you certain about the Phone NTP reference and CUPC? I have not heard that
> before. I was under the impression that CU
The Phone NTP Reference is used for SIP endpoints. SIP endpoints store a
NTP server address internally and they use the Phone NTP Reference
parameter to obtain that information. This parameter is not required for
SCCP endpoints.
The second is for the CUCM server.
You were pretty much spot on wi
ing the router or copy, delete then reapply ?
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Mar 3, 2013, at 8:43 PM, Jason Lee wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Was wondering if I could get a second set of eyes on my Class Based
> Shaping configuration. I just implemented between SA and SB. Th
The call to the mobile phone from the Mobility feature uses the Redirecting
CSS at the RDP of the user. None of the internal phones would have access
to use that CSS unless ofcourse it is the same CSS assigned to phones, but
that wouldn't be a great way to set up SNR. It's best to have dedicated
d strategy?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jason Lee wrote:
> Sounds good to me. I'm probably in a little late in the game to change my
> strategy now, but if you can make it work for you it sounds like it could
> be very beneficial.
>
> I can't say I've run in
Bill,
I like your method. Haven't been setting time zone up to this point, but
think I will going forward using your method. Thanks for the info!
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2013, at 10:53 AM, William Bell wrote:
First, I believe you do want the users provisioned in CUC to be provisioned
I use this as a strategy for checking my gateway configuration
Ensure that your are meeting requirements on the following
1. display-ie
2. BCHAN order selection (Ascending, Descending)
3. BCHAN number
1. How many BCHANs?
1. If not specified create a full PRI.
2.
; mwi relay
> max-conferences 8 gain -6
> transfer-system full-consult
> transfer-pattern .T
> secondary-dialtone 9
> create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
> ** **
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@o
I'm using unsolicited as well, unless I'm specifically asked or "nudged" by
the exam to use a different method. Best to be prepared for all of
options.
I've never had any issues with unsolicited stability.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Cory Gray wrote:
> I use unsolicited for both. Of cour
I typically use unsolicited on my SRST sites for MWI, but you may be on to
something. Maybe this method would be preferred. All depends what they
are looking for! Thus begins my tangent ;o)
I've seen the same behavior with the + as Bill.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Will
Steve,
I think that if you set up Subscribe Notify for MWI instead of Unsolicited
Notify it might preserve the light. In order to get that to work you would
have had to load the phones into SRST (auto provision all) at least once so
that they populate the running config. You can then configure t
1. I can confirm that I also don't see type added. I don't seem to be
suffering the side effect of the VM button not working though. I assume
it's not required for that functionality in SRST?
2. I don't have Fallback configured currently, but I believe it auto
populates the E164 as the name.
leaves and is no longer in the
> media path. If, on the other hand, it simply says parties on the call
> should hear a tone when the line is barged then there is no problem.
>
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerril
I have associated custom tones for join/leave
> events, I only hear the tone on join. Nada on leave. I haven't figured it
> out yet.
>
>
> -Bill
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
>
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Ja
I'm adding secondary dialtone to my CUCME and SRST configurations as well.
In my mind, we should be trying to preserve as much of the CUCM
configuration as possible. Not sure that it helps with grading, but better
safe than sorry I guess.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Pixar Perfect wrote:
>
All,
I have continually struggled with custom tones for a while now. I'm
working on the 5LB Lab 1 today and have the preserve CBarge configuration
in place. As I have it configured I'm expecting to hear one tone on entry
and 2 when a call exits the call.
What I'm actually hearing is 2 on join a
ll config but have you tried
> making sure it is not a hardware issue? Can you match the failed calls to
> failed pings? Have you some debugs of your sip messages? The study list
> needs more information to try to help with the issue.
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2013, at
I'm running into an issue with my CUE module. I'm getting intermittent
fast-busy when calling into it. At first I though it was a random thing,
but right now it is dropping 50% of all calls. 2 calls will go though, 2
will fail, and so on.
I see this behavior in both CME and CUCM integrations.
Bill,
I'm with you. I try to avoid number expansions to simplify things. I set
up similar scenarios exactly as you have in your first solution. I also
number my translation rules, patterns, and dial-peers in a manner that
allows me to call them all up using the section option on show commands.
I typically do not configure line level CSS to keep it simple. I also only
use set VM profile if I have to integrate both CUC and CUE. If that isn't
a requirement, I just set the profile to Default.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Ben John wrote:
>
> Directory Number Setting it is a good ide
I have never done this. Anyone else?
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Pixar Perfect wrote:
> Is there a need to enable(check) "Setup non-ISDN Progress Indicators IE
> Enable" on the MGCP GW page ?
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry le
I'm going to agree with Cory here. You will be much faster working through
the CLI. Time is of essence in the lab!
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Cory Gray wrote:
> It is permitted during the lab but I do not know of anyone who uses it.
> Some use GUI for CUE but I cannot see how it would sa
For sure. If they don't specify, I usually go with unsolicited.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Bill Lake wrote:
> the kind they tell you to use
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:15 PM, CCIEing wrote:
>
>> So, What type of MWI is better to use ??
>>
>> outcalling , unsolicited , or sub-notify
I think it's best if you know multiple ways to record prompts. There's no
telling what you might run into in the lab. I wouldn't take it for
granted that any one method would be available.
All methods rely on some form of integration. If for whatever reason you
can't get the integration to wor
All,
Having a weird problem. I have CUC integrated with CUCM via SCCP. I'm able
to access the CUC server by dialing the VM pilot or pressing the messages
button on the phone.
When I forward calls to VM under line configuration using the VM checkbox I
get a fast-busy. If I uncheck the box and ma
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: real wor
All,
I'm running into and issue trying to register SIP phones to my CUCME
rotuer. I'm using SIP Digest Authentication. For some reason the
SIP00070EA62AA9.cnf file is not being created in flash and my phone isn't
getting its configuration. I've attached the configs and debug output.
I've tried
I'm following the strategy of everyone else and using CUCM to dictate the
version of SIP running on the phones in my lab. I have 7960s running the
default version of SIP software that is available on CUCM 7.0(1). It shows
up as P0S3-08-8-00 in the device defaults page. I have registered phones
r
Hi All,
I'm running through V2L1 on section 4.3. I'm running into an issue that
didn't seem to get Vikram. When calling from my Br2 SIP phone back to a
CUCM phone I get ring and when I answer it hangs up, but the Br2 SIP phone
keeps ringing. In the 4.2 section we had to uncheck the "Wait for Fa
31 matches
Mail list logo
