Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 91, Issue 41

2013-10-20 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Hi MJ, I have this question too. Were you able to decide on this? Do I need to change my incoming calling number (coming from pstn) from 525tel:525 to 9525tel:9525 because the busy trigger on 3001 (phone) is set to 1 and therefore any other calling coming to this number will

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 89, Issue 100

2013-07-28 Thread Kapuria, Aman
I think there is a bug with that. Change it to huntstop ch 2 and test. If it works change ios. On 29/07/2013, at 10:51 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Query

2013-07-01 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Hey Guys, Do we have access to the Help page within the CUCM in lab? Do they block it? Can you click on service parameters to get the description? Aman Kapuria ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Live Reply and Notification

2013-07-01 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Hi Guys, I have few queries related to CUE. Appreciate if someone can comment from their experience with CUE. 1. I can't seem to get live reply working in CUE integrated with CME (Ref# IPExpert 5 Labs lab 4). I get This message cannot get a reply or something along those lines. Has

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-30 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Thanks, there is note from Mark Snow in one of these links that clears it up. Moreover, Cisco360 labs are using 10 bytes for frf.12 (including crc). Aman Kapuria From: Somphol Boonjing [mailto:somp...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013 3:57 PM To: Kapuria, Aman Cc: ccie_voice

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-28 Thread Kapuria, Aman
- 10% bandwidth over-provisioning is okay. So, you can use a bandwidth equal to 48k, for four concurrent calls, for example. HTH On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Kapuria, Aman aman.kapu...@team.telstra.commailto:aman.kapu...@team.telstra.com wrote: Anyone? Aman From: Kapuria, Aman Sent

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-27 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Anyone? Aman From: Kapuria, Aman Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013 3:31 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: L2 overhead for QoS Hi All, What L2 overhead do you use for frf.12 and MLP when you calculate number of calls over a link? Different providers have different approach around

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 88, Issue 132

2013-06-26 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Change pstn config from US to GK Aman -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013 2:22 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject:

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-26 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Hi All, What L2 overhead do you use for frf.12 and MLP when you calculate number of calls over a link? Different providers have different approach around this. QoS SRND says Frame Relay adds 4 bytes of Layer 2 overhead; Frame Relay with FRF.12 adds 8 bytes. With frf.12 voice packets don't get