Krishna, I added the mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map commands so that the
cos-map and dscp-map match with equivalent values. This is not a requirement
as your question is stated.
In addition for the link to the router you need:
mls qos trust dscp
On the server ports:
mls qos trust dscp
On
\)
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
jason,
reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25
percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if
needs it.
Isn't it queue 1 takes whatever the value defined in the threshold i.e.
for example
thresholds have to do with it.
Jason
- Original Message -
From: Krishna
Sent: 09/02/12 12:00 AM
To: murr...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\)
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
jason,
reg: If you leave priority que out configured along
...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\)
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
jason,
reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent
then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it.
Isn't it queue 1 takes whatever the value
\(daquinla\)
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
jason,
reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent
then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it.
Isn't it queue 1 takes whatever the value defined in the threshold i.e
Priority goes in this order
Priority queue out
Shape
Share
If lets say for example you want cos 5 to be in the priority queue but it
also states that cos 5 should have no more than 25 percent of the bandwidth.
Of course in the mappings you need to put cos 5 in que 1. Then you need
: murr...@usa.com murr...@usa.com
To: murr...@usa.com; Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com; Dan Quinlan (daquinla)
daqui...@cisco.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
Priority goes in this order
Priority
Hi Guys
I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solution.
The requirement is that on interface queue 2 queue 3 queue 4 should share
bandwidth as 20 40 40 percentage.
Now what's the best answer.
Interface f1/0/1
Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4
Or
Interface f1/0/1
The weights are relative to each other. Assuming priority queue is enabled
on queue 1 and having Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4 would mean:
Queue 2 = 2/10 or 20%
Queue 3 = 4/10 or 40%
Queue 4 = 4/10 or 40%
Both ways get the same results. There is no reason for the shape 3 0 0 0
unless
...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
Nowork_onlyfun
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 5:05 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question
Hi Guys
I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solution
10 matches
Mail list logo
