Hi Daniel,
I absolutely agree with you on the first part, regarding that enabling the
priority (expedite) queue will exclude queue 1 from the SRR shaping and
sharing.
However, I don’t think that it is possible to control the bandwidth
percentages using the buffer size allocation “mls qos
Giving it a second thought I have to agree with you. I might have
misinterpreted what Vik said (sorry Vik). So it seems it's impossible to
have both priority-queue out and some form of shaping for this traffic?
regards
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Wafik Maher wafikma...@gmail.com wrote:
ut
Thanks very much for this. I will read more carefully about this topic
looking carefully for the words in the documentation I could not find to
come with some conclusion as yours. Your answer makes sense and it is very
objective and I appreaciate that because this topic has beend discussed many
Hi Wafik,
Thanks for your great comments, just a little confuse for the two command
priority-queue output and srr-queue bandwidth shape
My question is if regarding that enabling the priority (expedite) queue
will exclude queue 1 from the SRR shaping and sharing. why there is a
example in the
2010 11:49:23 +1200
From: Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com
To: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS Priority and buffer size
Message-ID:
aanlkti=7gkgg=n=ptaa-8kbhvmjx3zkp3grre1r4q...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hello
Hello
Can someone confirm my understanding. The below question implies the use of
priority-queue out inteface command.
For adjusting how much bandwidth is given to the egress priority queue of a
3750/3560/2960 switch the interface command:
srr-queue bandwidth shape *means nothing*
The srr
Hi Daniel,
I had to review again my notes and the documentation to tell for sure (wish
I knew it out of my head as earlier I was studying a lot of the lan qos
theory).
You are correct, the srr-queue bandwidth shape means nothing when you
configure the priority queue out. As it says on the doc:
Thanks sir for your reply.
This is my understanding for quite a while and i hope i am not wrong for all
this time. So i'm happy that you agree. This goes inline to the document
3750 QoS configuration examples - The document does not state this
objectively and I'm finding weird the fact of seeing
