Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS QUESTION

2012-10-14 Thread Michael.Sears
Krishna, I added the "mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map" commands so that the cos-map and dscp-map match with equivalent values. This is not a requirement as your question is stated. In addition for the link to the router you need: mls qos trust dscp On the server ports: mls qos trust dscp On

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS QUESTION

2012-10-14 Thread Krishna
michael, thanks for your input on this query.. i am using 3750 switch provided by proctor labs.. I am well aware lan qos queuing and thresholds , but not sure where should i have to keep those values unless if they are explicitly stated.  adding to that question, i assume i need to put "mls qos

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS QUESTION

2012-10-14 Thread Michael.Sears
On a Cisco 3750 --> I used the Enterprise_QoS_SRND [1] pages 105 through 112 to put together the following QoS configuration to meet your stated requirements. I would recommend you follow the SRND when writing your QoS configuration it's pretty much cut and paste. Requirements: assign cos 5 t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

2012-09-04 Thread Bill Lake
of 25 >> percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if >> needs it. >> >> Isn't it queue 1 takes whatever the value defined in the threshold i.e. >> for example mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 1 138 138 92 138, this >> takes queue 1 to 1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

2012-09-04 Thread Bill Lake
that's what thresholds have to do with it. > > Jason > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Krishna > > Sent: 09/02/12 12:00 AM > > To: murr...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\) > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Q

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

2012-09-03 Thread Dan Quinlan (daquinla)
<mailto:murr...@usa.com>, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\) Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question jason, reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it. Isn't it que

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

2012-09-03 Thread Jason Murray
nt: 09/02/12 12:00 AM To: murr...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\) Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question jason, reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it. Isn&#

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

2012-09-01 Thread Krishna
From: "murr...@usa.com" To: murr...@usa.com; Randall Crumm ; Dan Quinlan (daquinla) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question > Priority goes in this order > > Priority queue out > Sha

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

2012-09-01 Thread murrayj
> Priority goes in this order > > Priority queue out > Shape > Share > > If lets say for example you want cos 5 to be in the priority queue but it > also states that cos 5 should have no more than 25 percent of the bandwidth. > Of course in the mappings you need to put cos 5 in que 1. Then y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question

2011-10-01 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nowork_onlyfun Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 5:05 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question Hi Guys I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solut

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question

2011-10-01 Thread Chris Martin
The weights are relative to each other. Assuming priority queue is enabled on queue 1 and having Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4 would mean: Queue 2 = 2/10 or 20% Queue 3 = 4/10 or 40% Queue 4 = 4/10 or 40% Both ways get the same results. There is no reason for the shape 3 0 0 0 unless require

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question

2011-10-01 Thread Nowork_onlyfun
Hi Guys I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solution. The requirement is that on interface queue 2 queue 3 queue 4 should share bandwidth as 20 40 40 percentage. Now what's the best answer. Interface f1/0/1 Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4 Or Interface f1/0/1 Srr-qu