Krishna, I added the "mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map" commands so that the
cos-map and dscp-map match with equivalent values. This is not a requirement
as your question is stated.
In addition for the link to the router you need:
mls qos trust dscp
On the server ports:
mls qos trust dscp
On
michael,
thanks for your input on this query.. i am using 3750 switch provided by
proctor labs.. I am well aware lan qos queuing and thresholds , but not sure
where should i have to keep those values unless if they are explicitly stated.
adding to that question, i assume i need to put "mls qos
On a Cisco 3750 --> I used the Enterprise_QoS_SRND [1] pages 105 through 112 to
put together the following QoS configuration to meet your stated requirements.
I would recommend you follow the SRND when writing your QoS configuration it's
pretty much cut and paste.
Requirements:
assign cos 5 t
of 25
>> percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if
>> needs it.
>>
>> Isn't it queue 1 takes whatever the value defined in the threshold i.e.
>> for example mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 1 138 138 92 138, this
>> takes queue 1 to 1
that's what thresholds have to do with it.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: Krishna
>
> Sent: 09/02/12 12:00 AM
>
> To: murr...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\)
>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Q
<mailto:murr...@usa.com>, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan
\(daquinla\)
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
jason,
reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent
then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it.
Isn't it que
nt: 09/02/12 12:00 AM
To: murr...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\)
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
jason,
reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent
then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it.
Isn
From: "murr...@usa.com"
To: murr...@usa.com; Randall Crumm ; Dan Quinlan (daquinla)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question
> Priority goes in this order
>
> Priority queue out
> Sha
> Priority goes in this order
>
> Priority queue out
> Shape
> Share
>
> If lets say for example you want cos 5 to be in the priority queue but it
> also states that cos 5 should have no more than 25 percent of the bandwidth.
> Of course in the mappings you need to put cos 5 in que 1. Then y
voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
Nowork_onlyfun
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 5:05 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question
Hi Guys
I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solut
The weights are relative to each other. Assuming priority queue is enabled
on queue 1 and having Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4 would mean:
Queue 2 = 2/10 or 20%
Queue 3 = 4/10 or 40%
Queue 4 = 4/10 or 40%
Both ways get the same results. There is no reason for the shape 3 0 0 0
unless require
Hi Guys
I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solution.
The requirement is that on interface queue 2 queue 3 queue 4 should share
bandwidth as 20 40 40 percentage.
Now what's the best answer.
Interface f1/0/1
Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4
Or
Interface f1/0/1
Srr-qu
12 matches
Mail list logo