Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-23 Thread Aamir Panjwani
; Nizar JAFRI; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD Agreed. And I'm not positive, but I don't believe you'll see the set-dscp-transmit option on a 3750 unless it is a Metro E class switch. On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Aamir P

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-23 Thread Kevin Damisch
] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:03 PM To: Aamir Panjwani Cc: Kevin Damisch; Nizar JAFRI; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD Agreed. And I'm not positive, but I don't believe you'll see the set-dscp-transmit option on a 3750

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-23 Thread Brett
; To: Nizar JAFRI; 'Jonathan Charles' > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD > > What is the difference between these 2 scenarios: > > mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8 > police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-trans

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-23 Thread Aamir Panjwani
: Nizar JAFRI; 'Jonathan Charles' Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD What is the difference between these 2 scenarios: mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8 police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit police 32000 8000 exceed-

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-23 Thread Kevin Damisch
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 5:27 PM To: 'Jonathan Charles' Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD Thanks jonathan, I have an example: Limit the SCCP traffic to 32k per endpoint, overloads should be marked down to AF11 The answer is

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-05 Thread Nizar JAFRI
Thanks. -Message d'origine- De : Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : samedi 5 septembre 2009 22:55 À : Nizar JAFRI Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD The burst size is really a function of your Tc... we divi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-05 Thread Jonathan Charles
t; De : Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] > Envoyé : samedi 5 septembre 2009 18:42 > À : Nizar JAFRI > Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-05 Thread Nizar JAFRI
auto qos for switching use the same value. Best regards. -Message d'origine- De : Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : samedi 5 septembre 2009 18:42 À : Nizar JAFRI Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-05 Thread Jonathan Charles
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a3a25.shtml It helps to understand how frame-relay works same basic principle... Jonathan On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote: > You can use whatever commands you want in the lab... if you think

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-05 Thread Jonathan Charles
You can use whatever commands you want in the lab... if you think they will help... The first number is the max-rate... the second is the burst size... go check out the token bucket process and you will see how it all works... Jonathan On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Nizar JAFRI wrote: > Hi, >

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

2009-09-05 Thread Nizar JAFRI
Hi, On the QOS SRND, Catalyst configuration. I found some commands like this: police 128000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit. Can someone explain, why the second parameter don't change, even though the rate changes?? Please let me know if we can use auto qos on the real LAB??