Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE

2010-05-07 Thread Bo Gao
7;s weird. > > Matthew Berry > > Digital Footprint: > Twitter: ciscovoiceguru > Skype: ciscovoiceguru > 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010 > > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Beh

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE

2010-05-07 Thread Berry, Matthew J.
iscovoiceguru 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bo Gao [bga...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 7:22 AM To: Matthew Berry Cc: OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Tra

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE

2010-05-07 Thread Bo Gao
I think the number 90 was not b/c 45 (dspfarm) + 45 (sdspfarm), you had a value of 90 because each transcoder session consists of two transcoding streams between callers using transcode. Bo On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Matthew Berry wrote: > Earlier this week, I began Vol 2 Lab 1. In

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE

2010-05-07 Thread Matthew Berry
Earlier this week, I began Vol 2 Lab 1.  In this lab, I configured transcoding resources on the CUBE.  These resources were registered to the gateway itself, under telephony-service. I was messing around on a router this morning and found something confusing.  If I define "maximum sessions" un