I absolutely *love* our Formulator. Bless its little white socks.
Artem
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Stephen McMahon wrote:
> Hi again,
> Just for clarification.
> The robot we are looking for will only dispense solutions for creating
> optimisation screens.
> No protein dispensing.
> Thanks
Dear all,
Recently I collected a data for my 20Kda protein in C2 space group, and
ran SFcheck in ccp4 suite. It is giving an indication for
pseudo-translation as 'Pseudo-translation is detected: 17.6%
Pseudo-translation vector: 0.000 0.000 0.078.
Is it a significant amount? Any commen
I have instlled coot under 64 bits system,
the problem is when I try to add some compound such as EG or PEG into map, the
coot always noticed me it can not find the library of CCP4. But the ccp4 works
very well in this machine. who can show me how to solve this problem.
Thank you.
We also recently obtained a Liquidator 96 from Rainin. Working well so far
and way below the price of any of the competitors.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Engin Özkan wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
>
> I did start a similar thread about a year ago. If you want to see the
> posts, check this out and
Hi again,
Just for clarification.
The robot we are looking for will only dispense solutions for creating
optimisation screens.
No protein dispensing.
Thanks,
Stephen
Dear Stephen,
I did start a similar thread about a year ago. If you want to see the
posts, check this out and the responses to it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk/msg14758.html
In my case, the winner was the Liquidator 96 from Rainin. It has proven
to be very useful and too
Bingo! I might suggest adding this library to the list of packages to
install in the platform specific portion of the problems page documentation.
Thanks again.
Katherine
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Ben Eisenbraun wrote:
> Hi Katherine,
>
> > terminal and there are no issues there. Howeve
Hi Katherine,
> terminal and there are no issues there. However when I try to execute a
> command (in this case "ccp4i") I get the error...
>
> exec: 4: /usr/local/ccp4/tcltk++/bin/bltwish: not found
This happens to be the error you get when you run a 32-bit binary on a
64-bit Ubuntu machine _wi
Hi -
We are in the market for a new liquid handling robot specifically for
dispensing custom 96 well crystallisation screens.
What are people using these days? Likes / dislikes?
Many thanks,
Stephen
Hi all,
I recently upgraded (if you can call it that) to Ubuntu 10.10 and I'm having
some issues with CCP4 and file recognition. I suspect this is an Ubuntu
issue rather than a CCP4 issue but I'm hoping someone will have an idea. I
downloaded the CCP4-Lin-generic.tar and ran the install.sh. It unp
Hi Bill - Thanks for the fix. I'll make the changes on the affected computers.
Alternatively, I may just have them download the newest package, which appears
to work fine on my machine.
Thanks again for the help, and for providing these builds to the community!
Jared
--
Jared Sampson
Xiangpen
Dear Hailiang
There are several protein-sugar and sugar-sugar link defined in the standard
refmac library.
You may try running refmac with the default options with the input pdb file in
which
- sugar residues included,
- no LINK record are specified.
If all required links are in the refmac's l
To all Diamond MX BAG Principal Investigators & Group Leaders,
Diamond Light Source will be holding a training day for MX BAG Users on
Wednesday 18th May 2011. The aim of the day is to provide BAG users with
sufficient training to be able to operate any of the Diamond MX beamlines
efficiently a
Dear Roberto,
I believe there are many "badly modeled" ligands with distorted geometry
deposited in the PDB.
Basically, because they haven't been checked properly beforehand, so I think
running a geometry check of you desired ligand against the PDB.
I think running your modeled geometry against
14 matches
Mail list logo
