Hi Ed,
While I don't think French and Wilson argue explicitly for the h>-4.0
requirement in their main manuscript, if you look at the source code
included in the supplementary material for this paper, they include this in
their implementation, which is what I worked from.
Charles, do you happen t
that shell as a whole has mostly weak data (in
> this case 89% with I/sigI<2 and 73% with I/sigI<1).
>
> What is counterintuitive is why do I have to discard reflections that are
> just plain weak, and not really outliers?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ed.
>
>
>
>
> On
Hi Ed,
I'm not directly familiar with the ctruncate implementation of French and
Wilson, but from the implementation that I put into Phenix (based on the
original F&W paper) I can tell you that any reflection where (I/sigI) -
(sigI/mean_intensity) is less than a defined cutoff (in our case -4.0),
Hi Yuri,
I don't know of a cheat-sheet, but I find the "Introduction to Protein
Structure" book by Branden and Tooze to useful for illustrations of
common folds.
Jeff
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Yuri Pompeu wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> Does anyone know of a quick (yet somewhat reliable) sor
ere:
http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/software/probe.php
If you need any help running MolProbity or Probe, please let me know
and I'd be happy to help.
Thanks,
Jeff Headd
Richardson Lab
Duke University
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Vellieux Frederic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> D
