[ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-14 Thread rohit kumar
Dear all, During MR using PHASER with a 1.8 A data, I found that the PAK=0 but all the other values are looking fine. When I run REFMAC5 the R/Rfree values are 25/30 (without water) and 21/26 (after adding water). Just want to know whether my solution is correct or not. if not please let me know

Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-15 Thread Eleanor Dodson
PAK=0 is GOOD - i.e. there are no clashes between symmetry equivalent molecules. So I think you have solved your structure. Eleanor On 15 September 2017 at 07:20, rohit kumar wrote: > Dear all, > > During MR using PHASER with a 1.8 A data, I found that the PAK=0 but all > the other values are lo

Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-15 Thread rohit kumar
Thanks to all for replying. If my solution is correct, why R/Rfree not going down from 21/25? I have tried most of the options like Tls, ncs refinement in refmac5 but these options are not helping me, might be I am not expert with using these options. Could someone guide me how to use these opti

Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-15 Thread Robbie Joosten
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem > > Thanks to all for replying. > > > If my solution is correct, why R/Rfree not going down from 21/25? > I have tried most of the options like Tls, ncs refinement in refmac5 but > these > options are not

Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-15 Thread James Holton
You know, I've been pondering that question for most of my adult life.  Why can't we push macromolecular R factors down to the level of experimental error like our "small molecule" colleagues do routinely?  I have a few ideas, and others do too.  In fact, there will be session on this topic at

Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-15 Thread Eleanor Dodson
James is absolutely right = the wonder of crystallography is that the difference map can theoretically pinpoint errors and suggest what is missing in your model.. But also check your data - modern synchrotrons often measure some reflections to a high resolution limit, but the noise can get greater

Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-22 Thread Tim Gruene
Hi James, small molecule structures usually model every or nearly every atom in the asymmetric unit - do you think that simple answer is too naive? Best, Tim On Friday, September 15, 2017 9:25:25 AM CEST James Holton wrote: > You know, I've been pondering that question for most of my adult life

Re: [ccp4bb] PAK=0 problem

2017-09-22 Thread Rachael Skyner
r PDRA (XChem) Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond House, Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE Tel: +44(0)1235 56 7537 From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Tim Gruene [tim.gru...@psi.ch] Sent: 22