I suppose observations from the same unmerged hkl (also known as a
"relp") are independent in some ways, but not in others. For example,
partials of the same relp are independent with respect to
photon-counting noise, detector read-out noise, flicker in the source,
and most types of shutter jitter
etin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Shya
Biswas
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:20 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] output individual redundancies
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows what HKL 2000 does? Does it merge all
partials and treat it as one, because oft
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows what HKL 2000 does? Does it merge all
partials and treat it as one, because often times I noticed with increase in
partials the redundancy increases.
Shya
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:24 PM, James Holton wrote:
> At the risk of asking a question to which I shou
Summed partials count as one. SCALA doesn't adjust for <360deg, maybe it should
as they are not independent. What would you call them?
I prefer "multiplicity" since Elspeth Garman commented "if they are redundant
why bother measuring them"
Phil
Sent from my iPhone
On 15 Jul 2011, at 18:24, J
At the risk of asking a question to which I should already know the answer:
do partials "count" as "redundancy"?
That is, in SCALA, is the number of "observations" the number of
recorded spots? Or is it the number of recorded spots after adding
partials? If it is the latter, what happens if
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 09:26 +0100, Phil Evans wrote:
> Ed. You could count them from the unmerged output as you say, or I
> could make you a special version of SCALA or Aimless maybe next week
>
Phil,
that would be fantastic! Hope there is broader interest in such option
(beyond Robbie and myse
seem to be a cif token for that.
Cheers,
Robbie
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:26:39 +0100
> From: p...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] output individual redundancies
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>
> No M/ISYM is different it&
No M/ISYM is different it's the symmetry number plus a full or partial flag.
Ed. You could count them from the unmerged output as you say, or I could make
you a special version of SCALA or Aimless maybe next week
Phil
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Jul 2011, at 23:15, Ethan Merritt wrote:
> On T
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 02:55:26 pm Ed Pozharski wrote:
> I am looking for a way to output redundancy per individual reflection,
> preferably for scala but if that is not possible then maybe for
> scalepack.
If you read the unmerged file from scalepack into ccp4 using
combat, it creates a dat
I am looking for a way to output redundancy per individual reflection,
preferably for scala but if that is not possible then maybe for
scalepack.
>From my (admittedly quick) look at the scala manual it seems that I can
use something like UNMERGED output option to exclude outliers and then
would
10 matches
Mail list logo
