On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:11 PM Alan Perry wrote:
>
>
> On 3/6/19 5:15 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:36 PM Alan Perry via cctech <
> cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> There was a lot of related discussion to this, but my question was never
>> answered. Now I seem to have
On 3/6/19 5:15 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:36 PM Alan Perry via cctech
mailto:cct...@classiccmp.org>> wrote:
There was a lot of related discussion to this, but my question was
never
answered. Now I seem to have found the answer myself.
According to a p
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:36 PM Alan Perry via cctech
wrote:
> There was a lot of related discussion to this, but my question was never
> answered. Now I seem to have found the answer myself.
>
> According to a post on VCF Forums, here is the list:
>
> 2x 3200uF @ 16V
> 1x 2200uF @ 35V
> 2x 820uF
There was a lot of related discussion to this, but my question was never
answered. Now I seem to have found the answer myself.
According to a post on VCF Forums, here is the list:
2x 3200uF @ 16V
1x 2200uF @ 35V
2x 820uF @ 250V
1x 560uF @ 20V
1x 330uF @ 20V
3x 47uF @ 16V
1x 10uF @ 35V
1x 2uF @
Yes, I can see now that they are different. If I can't find a license
tape I'll probably put on 5.5 which I have as well. In fact I have V1.0
on up. I'm running two Simh instances on each Raspberry Pi all clustered
and running DECnet and TCP/IP. I was hoping for a large mix of machines
and VMS
Prior to v5.0, VAX/VMS didn’t use LMF, so as Antonio pointed out, you need a
license tape. While I saw these online a few years ago, I didn’t download them
at the time, and they don’t seem to be online anywhere.
Years ago, I got a MicroVAX 3 system running VAX/VMS 4.6 from an RD53. It
booted
Ok, I got a chance to login and try installing DECnet so I could
reproduce the error. This is the result of
trying to install without a license. VMS by itself does not complain.
If you have not already installed the DECnet-VAX license, then do so now.
After the license has been installed, you
Brian,
I wonder why you think the Hobbyist licences won't work. I have a number of
virtual and physical vaxen and virtiual and have no problems networking them.
I believe that most of HECNET runs on Hobbyist Licences. After all it’s a
Hobbyist DECNET.
http://www.update.uu.se/~bqt/hecnet.html
On 06/03/2019 23:22, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
On 03/06/2019 04:07 PM, Brian Roth via cctalk wrote:
Hello,I have a current hobbyists license for OpenVMS 7.3 and a
handful of simulated VAXen. I wanted to add my simulated 11/780 and
11/782 to my DECnet and wondered if there was a (legal of c
On 03/06/2019 04:07 PM, Brian Roth via cctalk wrote:
Hello,I have a current hobbyists license for OpenVMS 7.3 and a handful
of simulated VAXen. I wanted to add my simulated 11/780 and 11/782 to my
DECnet and wondered if there was a (legal of course) license workaround
to install networking on a
Hello,I have a current hobbyists license for OpenVMS 7.3 and a handful of
simulated VAXen. I wanted to add my simulated 11/780 and 11/782 to my DECnet
and wondered if there was a (legal of course) license workaround to install
networking on an older version such as 4.4. The current PAKS will not
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 3:50 PM Al Kossow via cctalk
wrote:
> I guess there aren't enough Unix greybeards around here any more.
> The UBC tape, like Usenix tapes, Yale E editor, and the RAND editor tapes
> were just things you knew about.
I got into UNIX in 1984/85 on VAXen and I know all about th
Al Kossow via cctalk writes:
> On 3/6/19 10:14 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg via cctalk wrote:
> sigh.. before this goes farther into the weeds, the tape
> came from the University of British Columbia's Biosciences Data Center
>
> there is a short bio of Bill Webb at
> http://archive.michigan-terminal-syst
On 3/6/19 10:14 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg via cctalk wrote:
> Brent Hilpert writes:
>
>> On 2019-Mar-05, at 10:07 PM, Richard Loken wrote:
>
>>> TRIUMF was using /11s for cyclotron control I believe
sigh.. before this goes farther into the weeds, the tape
came from the University of British Columb
Brent Hilpert writes:
> On 2019-Mar-05, at 10:07 PM, Richard Loken wrote:
>> TRIUMF was using /11s for cyclotron control I believe, that's not
>> where you anticipate UNIX showing up.
>> But was it Unix or something else like RT-11? Or was it a VAX?
> Well, I don't know for certain, I was just
On 3/6/19 1:07 AM, Richard Loken via cctalk wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
>
>> TRIUMF was using /11s for cyclotron control I believe, that's not
>> where you anticipate UNIX showing up.
>
> But was it Unix or something else like RT-11? Or was it a VAX?
>
> Betwee
On 2019-Mar-05, at 10:07 PM, Richard Loken wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
>
>> TRIUMF was using /11s for cyclotron control I believe, that's not where you
>> anticipate UNIX showing up.
>
> But was it Unix or something else like RT-11? Or was it a VAX?
>
> Between
17 matches
Mail list logo
