[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-13 Thread dwight via cctalk
. Just my guess. Dwight From: Cameron Kaiser via cctalk Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 8:51 AM To: Jon Elson via cctalk Cc: Cameron Kaiser Subject: [cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f > If the failure affects the EPROM monitor,then any results you get f

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-12 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> If the failure affects the EPROM monitor,then any results you get from the > monitor are suspect. No, what I mean is, the appearance of the upper six bits being dead was because of how the monitor shifts in data from the keypad. Since bit 2 was always zero, it would look like everything above it

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-12 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 5/11/23 21:41, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: I thought about this, but the KIM is a pretty simple system. The only memory mapped device in that range (really, on the entire unit) are the RIOTs, and their RAM at $1780 is fine and does not echo. The KIM only does address decoding for 8K and

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-12 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
Thanks for the suggestions, everyone. This board has NEC D2102AL-4 SRAMs on it, so I ordered a couple MM2102AN-4s which look equivalent. I'll swap one in when it arrives and see if that's the problem. -- personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kai

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-12 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 11, 2023, at 10:41 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk > wrote: > >> I thought about this, but the KIM is a pretty simple system. The only memory >> mapped device in that range (really, on the entire unit) are the RIOTs, and >> their RAM at $1780 is fine and does not echo. >> >> The KIM o

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Brent Hilpert via cctalk
On 2023-May-11, at 7:41 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: > it's actually an artifact of the monitor that the upper 6 were clear. > Actually, > the stuck bit is entirely bit 2 (i.e., it goes > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f > 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 8 9 a b 8 9 a b > > and the high nybble is OK).

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> I thought about this, but the KIM is a pretty simple system. The only memory > mapped device in that range (really, on the entire unit) are the RIOTs, and > their RAM at $1780 is fine and does not echo. > > The KIM only does address decoding for 8K and echoes the rest, so the same > fault is map

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
>> Odd fault on my Rev D KIM-1 popped up while writing code this afternoon >> (initially I thought I had a bug in my paper tape transmitter) - between >> $0280 >> and $029f, the upper 5 bits are stuck at zero. The rest of the address range >> seems fine. In particular, $0080-$009f, $0180-$019f and

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 5/11/23 00:53, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: Odd fault on my Rev D KIM-1 popped up while writing code this afternoon (initially I thought I had a bug in my paper tape transmitter) - between $0280 and $029f, the upper 5 bits are stuck at zero. The rest of the address range seems fine. In par