[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-22 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
Original Message- From: Fred Cisin [mailto:ci...@xenosoft.com] Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 11:32 PM To: t.gard...@computer.org Cc: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' Subject: RE: [cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpag

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-22 Thread Tom Gardner via cctalk
@xenosoft.com] Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 11:32 PM To: t.gard...@computer.org Cc: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' Subject: RE: [cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet] On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, Tom Gardner

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-22 Thread Warner Losh via cctalk
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 7:13 AM Paul Koning via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > > On Aug 21, 2022, at 8:35 PM, W2HX via cctalk > wrote: > > > > I always thought it was interesting how 5 1/4 is 3U (rack units). I > thought there might have been some relationship to that. But could

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-22 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On Aug 22, 2022, at 11:17 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 7:13 AM Paul Koning via cctalk > wrote: > > > > On Aug 21, 2022, at 8:35 PM, W2HX via cctalk wrote: > > > > I always thought it was interesting how 5 1/4 is 3U (rack units). I thought > > there might

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-22 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On Aug 21, 2022, at 8:35 PM, W2HX via cctalk wrote: > > I always thought it was interesting how 5 1/4 is 3U (rack units). I thought > there might have been some relationship to that. But could have been just > coincidence. For floppies, likely yes. That fact did get used later on, in

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-22 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, Tom Gardner wrote: Fred: Please quote the current version of the oral history, It says: Porter: Jimmy said that you guys got together with the guys at Wang in a dark bar one night and, after a discussion, you decided on the size of what the smaller diskette should be and

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-22 Thread Tom Gardner via cctalk
e: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet] BTW, I first heard the story in the late 1980s? My recollection was that it was in a sidebar in a magazine article. I can't currently find that. Massaro's denial of it <http://arc

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread W2HX via cctalk
Gardner via cctalk Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 7:40 PM To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' ; ci...@xenosoft.com Cc: Tom Gardner Subject: [cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet] >-Ori

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Tom Gardner via cctalk
al Message- From: Fred Cisin [mailto:ci...@xenosoft.com] Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 5:40 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Cc: t.gard...@computer.org; Tom Gardner Subject: RE: [cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Chris Elmquist via cctalk
https://www.foryourparty.com/cocktail-napkins -- Chris Elmquist > On Aug 21, 2022, at 4:45 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk > wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, Ali wrote: >> You should just do it and add a teeny tiny disclaimer at the bottom >> regarding the veracity of the story. It would make for

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022, W2HX wrote: I always thought it was interesting how 5 1/4 is 3U (rack units). I thought there might have been some relationship to that. But could have been just coincidence. I think that it is related. I think that the drive (not the diskette) was apparently intended to

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Tom Gardner via cctalk
>-Original Message- >From: Fred Cisin [mailto:ci...@xenosoft.com] >Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 12:31 PM >To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts >Subject: [cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
BTW, I first heard the story in the late 1980s? My recollection was that it was in a sidebar in a magazine article. I can't currently find that. Massaro's denial of it

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, Ali wrote: You should just do it and add a teeny tiny disclaimer at the bottom regarding the veracity of the story. It would make for a great gag gift! Or if you want to get real fancy have a QR code that can be scanned on each napkin for a site with more detailed

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Ali via cctalk
RESENT FOR LEGIBILITY >I seriously considered getting some custom >napkins printed up (bars >sometimes have personalized napkins; 5.25" is >available, although these >days, bars usually use smaller, just to keep from >making rings on the >tables), with just the outline of a 5.25" disk

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Ali via cctalk
>I seriously considered getting some custom >napkins printed up (bars >>sometimes have personalized napkins; 5.25" is >available, although these >>days, bars usually use smaller, just to keep from >making rings on the >>tables), with just the outline of a 5.25" disk jacket >printed on them

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, Tom Gardner via cctalk wrote: The only person who ever promulgated the "Dr. Wang bar napkin" story was Jim Porter who was not in any way involved with the decision as to the size of the 5½ drive or media size and only began telling his tale many years after the decision.

[cctalk] Re: Wang bar napkin story [WAS:RE: Re: "Revival" of a dedicated Micropolis webpage on internet]

2022-08-21 Thread Tom Gardner via cctalk
The only person who ever promulgated the "Dr. Wang bar napkin" story was Jim Porter who was not in any way involved with the decision as to the size of the 5½ drive or media size and only began telling his tale many years after the decision. Both Massaro and Adkisson deny there was ever such a