> On May 5, 2022, at 4:53 PM, Toby Thain via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 2022-05-05 1:43 p.m., John Robertson via cctalk wrote:
>> On 2022/05/05 10:26 a.m., Toby Thain via cctalk wrote:
>>> On 2022-05-05 1:03 p.m., John Herron via cctalk wrote:
Someone at work pointed this out and I've never
On 2022-05-05 1:43 p.m., John Robertson via cctalk wrote:
On 2022/05/05 10:26 a.m., Toby Thain via cctalk wrote:
On 2022-05-05 1:03 p.m., John Herron via cctalk wrote:
Someone at work pointed this out and I've never really thought about
it. Is
anyone here aware of the decision or reason to use
On 2022/05/05 10:26 a.m., Toby Thain via cctalk wrote:
On 2022-05-05 1:03 p.m., John Herron via cctalk wrote:
Someone at work pointed this out and I've never really thought about
it. Is
anyone here aware of the decision or reason to use a different 1
character
for the last 1 vs the first 1?
On 2022-05-05 1:03 p.m., John Herron via cctalk wrote:
Someone at work pointed this out and I've never really thought about it. Is
anyone here aware of the decision or reason to use a different 1 character
for the last 1 vs the first 1?
Got a picture?
Someone at work pointed this out and I've never really thought about it. Is
anyone here aware of the decision or reason to use a different 1 character
for the last 1 vs the first 1?
